>>107742359
60fps was the minimum standard in the crt days, but these days with sample and hold lcds/oleds it looks like shit
fuck man if you were serious it's been a bare minimum for a long time, i played games like ut'99, cs, and c&c at higher framerates literally 20 years ago. 1080p60 is office pc monitor tier and has been for 15 years

>>107741852
>AI is in the exact same boat
It's not even close. AI is completely useless when compared to Internet.
>It doesn't take a whole lot of imagination and common sense to see how completely this is going to remodel the systems we live in
You sound severely Indian.

>>107723404
You don't need a big GPU to play old games, anything made post 2004, with a handful of exceptions, sucks ass anyways

>>107723427
Intel would have to support Linux first.

>>107723190
I'll just play 20+ year old games if GPU's get overpriced. Outside of Death Stranding 2 Steam, there is NOTHING on the horizon for modern titles that I'm wanting.

File: file.png (343 KB, 1381x1809)

343 KB PNG

>>107741595
What's the issue?

>>107742443
that's the fun of it, but I respect that

File: deJA_zi_00025_.png (2.33 MB, 1920x1280)

2.33 MB PNG

>>107742426
very zen
in that case, I hope its a perfectly cozy year for you

>>107742982
start with a super basic intro, then rp a while and other intros will come to mind

>>107742982
tell the model to write several intros for you and use that for inspiration for writing your own

>>107742971
Why do you lie, got me. For some reason they didn't add any GLMs even though the license seems to be fully permissive.

>>107743029
It's there, just not listed on their website
https://integrate.api.nvidia.com/v1/models

>>107743039
>https://integrate.api.nvidia.com/v1/models
Cool, it's also much faster than the official API

>>107740066
oy. thats why we need you to use your fingerprints, and soon your iris scan.

checkmate, """""privooocy advocates"""...

Is any site offering unlimited Nano Banana Pro at the moment? I was using it on Hailuo but the free promo ended.

File: c331469b-8d2c-410d-8ce5-6(...).jpg (692 KB, 1024x1024)

692 KB JPG

>>107742470
Flowith kind of counts. But they may end it one day. They went from unlimited to 30, to 15, 10, and now it's five per 30 minutes or sometimes a day. Not to mention sometimes it says you did more than five when you didn't.

File: hq720.jpg (40 KB, 686x386)

40 KB JPG

>>107741967
>What's the mystery?
I asked /g/ about this because I wanted to mess around.
/g/ did have a collective meltdown over this question for unknown reasons.

>What's the mystery?
Lets go.
>Connect a fax machine to your computer
>Connect a fax machine
>a fax machine
See this is the problem.
I was more interested in generating the fax signals on the computer not using the computer as a glorified
> Instead of using its own scanner

I wanted to mess around with fax without buying a fax machine.

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>107742517
>I'm not chatgpt and don't use it.
You are a bot!
> also worked as an aircraft mechanic for 7 years, and a carpenter for 2. I started working at the age of 13 my mother forged a copy of my birth certificate and there was no way to verify them back then.

Because of this

Lets see
13+2+7+24 = 46 years of work.
>my mother forged a copy of my birth certificate
Hmm so how old are you exactly?

>all you have to do idiot is google those acronyms. I'm done spoon feeding
You lost the debate right here!
>Noo simply read whatever bullshit jurnalist say

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>107742927
>You know like try to send fax between 2 computers over the cellular network
bad news anon. this only works with old analog cellular. I worked for company and we had a customer who needed to do this for remote job sites. it won't work as the analog fax signal lose information when converted to digital and back again. We spent weeks trying to find a solution now this was back around 2000, but no one has wanted to do that since and fax machines as in demand as they used to be. if someone wants to send a doc now they scan it to pdf and email it.

>>107742994
>13+2+7+24 = 46 years of work.
anon your retardation is beyond the pale. I did not say I have worked every day since I was 13. I said I started working at 13. I had several jobs that were 2 or 3 week summer jobs.
my actual total amount of work experience is more like:
24+7+2+a whole lot of little short jobs.

OMG I just finished reading the rest of your post. we are done here. you argue like an angry 5th grader who's panties have sand in them. you can't read. you can't think. you ignore facts. you won't do your own research. you are just arguing to argue.

File: US-Robotics-3CP2977-OEM-5(...).jpg (148 KB, 1280x960)

148 KB JPG

>>107742927
>I wanted to mess around with fax without buying a fax machine.
Alright, then get yourself one of those fax/modem cards, and plug your phone line straight into your computer.

You're on your own beyond that.

File: 1739555542586484.gif (479 KB, 420x315)

479 KB GIF

>>107742949
>two cunts fighting with each other

>>107742949
>le cun

>>107742180
stop

jewish op to censor chatbots through legislature

>>107742199
They're the main financial beneficiaries of this whole ordeal. So is it a ploy to later cry wolf (antisemitism) because they're once again persecuted and kvetch about anudda shoah?

>>107740728
>put her printer in a faraday bag and note her reaction
well? how did she react?

>>107742928
>well? how did she react?
well, how would you react when someone stole your printer and buried it in tinfoil? Given that he stabbed her to death few weeks later, I guess we can assume the stasi printer's Final Solution remained otherwise unresolved.

>>107733421
nigger

Statcounter told obvious lies like Armenia using Windows XP and Singapore using Windows 7.

>>107735327
Firefox's own telemetry reports almost 15% of Firefox users using adblockers. That's at least 25-30 million users.

Even if 10 million people switched from Windows to Linux, it'd be less than .1% of all internet users

>>107739098
First day on /g/?

>>107742445
It's slow because of their malloc. It doesn't necessarily need to be that slow regardless.

>>107742502
It's cool that you can run a modern OS on some toy hardware nobody uses but that's not what 99% of users care about

>>107742533
What's really cooler is pkgsrc and the Rump kernel. It's amazing how NetBSD has modified the meaning of portability.

>>107742445
I didn't say OpenBSD is fast

>>107742306
TemplateVMs don't work but you are able to setup OpenBSD as a standalone network VM. I believe there is a guide on the Qubes Forum if you just search the word 'OpenBSD'

>>107741057
>patented software is the same as cloud kikeware
are you stupid or disabled?

File: huntereyesstallman.jpg (64 KB, 760x561)

64 KB JPG

Freedom.

>>107736639
You are retarded and don't understand the point of software freedom

>>107741960
>get the jab,goyim! and remember about your mask!
>her body her choice! Now stay back so I can abort your children, goyim!
>Pedophilia is good actually, me raping your kids won't hurt them, trust me, goyim!
>Now repeat with me, I AM FREE!Right, goyim?

>>107737754
my brain had a malfunction I conflated patented software and copyright software with heavy restrictions.

I think all copyright should be replaced with non disclosure and public agreements. NDA for closed source among a team of developers. And the GPL3 and BSD reimagined as a public contract that activates whenever someone modifies GPL code.

Honestly if it was just copyright laws preventing sharing of software I wouldn't care. What pisses me off is how ideas are protected by the state. In example Adobe held a 20 year patent on adjustment layers, or Namco patenting the loading screen mini games. Or how some licenses say you can't legally modify the software even in your home or only they can fix the hardware. Similar to right to repair laws. That is what I am against.

It just seems that Stallman views it as a human right to modify other people's software, that is where I disagree. Its a voluntary agreement of people participating in GPL3 software.

>>107737922
Fact check them. Grok and DeepSeek do not understand but they do have very good fact checking abilities.
https://www.reddit.com/r/GROKvsMAGA/

The most likely hallucinations are when Grok gives something that sounds like an answer but is a complete fabrication. DeepSeek doesn't do that much at all but Grok does from time to time. Other then source checking the best thing to do is have the same conversation with different AIs several times and look for consistency and tell them to cite the sources.

>>107742044
>It wouldn't be meaningful to talk about "correctness"
Sure it would.
>X *is what it is*
So is Wayland.

>>107740570
so... wayland blocks three-letter glowies from recording my screen, capturing my keystrokes, and much more?
based

>>107740570
>("We're treated like hostile threat actors on our own workstations")
Lmao
I just know when D-Bus gets deprecated you faggots are going to sing its praises.

>>107741996
The "you can't criticize Wayland because it's a protocol" cope is getting old. If there isn't a protocol supported by a strong majority of compositors that provides a given feature, the feature should be considered unsupported. If X11 had theoretical provisions for some feature in the protocol, but that feature wasn't actually available in X.org, we'd consider it unsupported too. Anything else would be dishonest.

>>107742077
It's pure security theater, you're not meaningfully more protected. There's a ton of ways to exfiltrate data, like reading your home directory or using LD_PRELOAD tricks. Wayland's "security" is simultaneously too lax and too strict. Too lax because it doesn't provide meaningful protection; too strict because security is merely an excuse for designing things that Wayland devs don't like out of the protocol. Configurable access control is a thing that exists, so there's no need to have a gimped protocol to achieve security.

>>107742943
>The "you can't criticize Wayland because it's a protocol" cope is getting old. If there isn't a protocol supported by a strong majority of compositors that provides a given feature, the feature should be considered unsupported. If X11 had theoretical provisions for some feature in the protocol, but that feature wasn't actually available in X.org, we'd consider it unsupported too. Anything else would be dishonest.
But the majority of the things labelled "Not Supported" here actually are supported in the majority of compositors, it's not theoretical. There's no loss of functionality in any real implementation, but because it's not required as part of the protocol they're claiming it's unsupported. It's very dishonest.

>>107742518
>the sub <30" monitor maymay needs to die.
fuck off stop acting like your opinion is the only that matters foe everyone, cunt
>>107732929
> I regret getting a 27" monitor, the thing is so fucking big it's like I'm sitting in front of a tv. maybe my desk is just not deep enough. I didnt consider at all what a change going to 15.6 to 27 inch would be, I just bought the recommended budget 1440p monitor. considering buying something smaller and pawning this one off. there's a 24.5" 1440p aoc monitor I might just get that. I just want a cozy set up like pic rel but at higher resolutions

>>107741019
I use one 32" 4k monitor now. I used to use dual monitors but it's a bit of a pain in practice, one big monitor is simpler, 32" or more gives you good height for code editors

>>107742529
Just go 1 fewer monitor and problem solved.

>>107741019
5x27"

>>107741019
>programming on an ultra widescreen
No, don't be a fucking idiot.
Sourcecode and documentation are narrow and tall.
I've tried to program on an ultra widescreen because that's what my employer had, it sucked.
Then I programmed at home on a much bigger and higher resolution 16:9 monitor and it was much better because I could actually see more than 50 lines of code at a time.
A big 16:10 or 4:3 monitor would be best, but they don't get very big.

>>107742007
I wouldn't particulary call KVM shit. it's used at server space and fuzzed by google so that has to mean something. also Xen isn't exactly a good one on its own lane. it's still a relatively big monolithic kernel that isn't written with significant formalisms. though they're trying to improve it at least, by bringing some MISRA-C rules to the codebase for example.

Still though in the end qubes is the only practical OS with relatively good security all around. You don't have to fuck around and worry if you left out something. Like having to passthrough network / usb to VMs like Xen's dom0 disaggregation and I'm not even sure there's a written code to proxy USB events safely from VM to host right now.

>>107738449
Yes I use it daily, but it's only good for people who are willing to sacrifice some convenience for security. Like is having to press ctrl+shift+c and ctrl+shift+v every time you want to copy/paste between Qubes worth the peace of mind of knowing you'll basically never, EVER be a victim of some Clipboard/pastejacking/password stealing attack?
Is it worth separating everything into Qubes just for the sense of security that one malicious program won't be able to compromise your entire digital life?
Do you store 5+ figures worth of crypto keys on your computer? Do you ever worry about those keys touching the internet somehow, or that some malicious javascript on a webpage could find some way to break out of your browser sandbox and steal that shit? Or that any of the other crap you've installed over the course of your life could have hidden malware that sniffs for that sort of thing?
Do you torrent a bunch of pirated software and are sketched out that some of it could have malware in it?
Do you want to run normie spyware crap like Discord, but keep it contained so that it can't spy on your microphone, webcam or monitor everything you're doing all the time like it can on Windows?
Do you like to use Tor, VPNs, I2P etc. and want the safest, most secure and leak-proof setup for doing so?
Do you want to be able to plug in that USB stick from your boomer family member, who downloads a new virus every other week, without worrying that some BadUSB keyboard hijacking bullshit is going to own your entire system?
If so then you might wanna use Qubes.
If you're the kind of person who never thinks about this stuff, then you probably shouldn't bother. Just stick to windows or whatever the fuck you usually use

>>107742906
>Is it worth separating everything into
you're not required to seperate just because. you can very well use just 1 VM for everything if it's OK in your threat model.
I think it's not inconvenience that makes QubesOS hard to use but resource overhead and no GPU acceleration except full passthrough

>>107738449
>Are you capable of reading?
>Are you capable of understanding and following simple instructions?
>Are you capable of understanding that Qubes isn't a consoomer OS?
If the answer to any of these questions is no then no it isn't usable for (You).

>>107742968
>you're not required to seperate just because. you can very well use just 1 VM for everything if it's OK in your threat model.
If that's the case, then you shouldn't use Qubes to begin with because it offers no extra value over Linux when it's used in such a way.

>>107742380
All without usecase I'm afraid sweaty

>>107742406
Why would you subject to a battery-operated device from 2010? Imagine the battery degradation on that fucker.

>>107742461
You take out the battery and use it plugged in

Its a complete coincidence that a majority of the posts ITT came from the same IP addres im sure. Definitely not the indian kde schizo.

>>107742978
>"there's no way people hate my qtslop, it must be an Indian conspiracy"
Nate, fix your krashware