>>107741377
Sad but KEK

File: 1767388922854.png (4 KB, 225x225)

4 KB PNG

I use grok to rp with gr15

>>107737970
Here's the clip if anyone is interested. I couldn't find the raw clip so you will have to deal with two retarded Canadians yelling over it.
https://youtu.be/e0Wpz4kA55Y&t=1722

File: 1744291857467627.png (11 KB, 602x141)

11 KB PNG

>>107737300
Yep, I went back to it recently since I remembered it being really repetitive for erotica and it's so good now. Has all the fetishes you want, doesn't refuse anything, listens to your custom instructions, even provides useful suggestions. I think Gemini is a little more creative but it's so censored that it cancels itself out. Has generous free limits especially when you can just log into another google account and share the same project.
Hope it doesn't get censored after normies discovered it with bikini drama. I don't like the UI for it so I made gemini write css for it that looks like 3.5 era chatgpt.

>>107737300
>GOOD MORNING SAARS
>@GROK PUT HER IN THE BIKINI SAAR

>>107744977
That would cause audio stutters. You should be able to set the sampling rate of the audio, or resample it wth relatively few resources, to make it match the video. Dunno if there's an option for that.

>>107743714
Ikatroon ruined this general

>>107745475
It does not.

This stupid script adjusts the audio delay to maintain A-V sync every time the value changes (several times per second), and there are absolutely no audio stutters:

mp.observe_property("avsync", "number", function(_, avsync)
    if avsync == nil then return end
    local current_audio_delay = mp.get_property_number("audio-delay", 0.0)
    mp.set_property_number("audio-delay", current_audio_delay - avsync)
end)

Explain https://github.com/mpv-player/mpv/issues/17222

>>107746967
usual gpu-next and vulkan brokenness

File: 1761335737207944.jpg (129 KB, 990x936)

129 KB JPG

>>107746685
I'm getting more of a seared bite from the impossible whooper than from a real NO NO NO NO NO

File: ai bubble.png (40 KB, 584x453)

40 KB PNG

>>107737777
>How is AI not another dot-com bubble?
It is. AI capex spending exceeded cosnumer spending this year. Make no mistake about it, that bubble is going to pop.
>What are its practical applications, aside from porn generation and helping high schoolers with their homework?
As a dev, it's great for generating boilerplate.
Some industries have seen a legitimate revolutionary benefit too e.g. Biology. Stuff like Alphafold has completely changed protein folding for instance.

File: ai-lmaoo-hrngh-brap-heheh.png (18 KB, 642x81)

18 KB PNG

>>107737777
checked.
also: it is
just check revenue vs valuation, its a complete wtf
its all speculative bubble
theyre basically sharpening a fork
yes, there is improvements.
but towards where?
its smarter at hallucinating and being told what to do. big wow, currently picking my jaw up from the floor (not)

>>107737777
Right now the most successful use case of it is for programming. I see three reasons for that.
First, with many types of code the tool can give the model immediate objective feedback about the correctness of its output (does the code compile? do automated tests pass? etc). Any issues can be fixed automatically without involving the user. This kind of feedback isn't available for most other domains.
Second, currently, to get the best results you still need some technical knowledge about how these models work and how to use them effectively. You need to know what to include and what to leave out, you need to understand when to restart with a new conversation instead of asking for corrections, etc. Programmers are more likely to be able to do this.
Third, for the general public there's a limit to how much people are willing to pay for an AI service and this means that providers can't use their most effective brute force approaches for every request. They have to try to economise and hope that cheap basic models with minimal tool use will suffice. Programmers are willing to pay $200/mo for effective AI tools so a more compute-heavy approach can be used for them.

It will definitely spread to other domains as the models and tools improve and prices fall.

File: ai-lmaoo-simd.png (57 KB, 702x470)

57 KB PNG

>>107746901
>Right now the most successful use case of it is for programming.
kek. just-no. lmao even
>inb4 tame tone
i want it to look up shit, not hallucinate on me

>>107741454
Pre-ordered this thing if I don´t forget I will make a thread when it arrives. Most likely in march.

>>107744782
Actually looks like a neat idea. Sucks it's subpar for Android use.
Looking forward to your thread.

>>107741454
What's the problem?

>>107741454
look how much screenspace is lost around the stupid island.
look how it cuts off at the other side
do iToddlers really?

Is it worth it, jannies?

>>107744824
I love child porn and gay boron


I don’t fuck 12 year old boys

I fuck girls

>>107746047
I rape girls , even babies

File: 1744274658139750.jpg (15 KB, 593x352)

15 KB JPG

Could someone kindly link me to Chance?

>>107719654
We do have nice things.
Just give them a Chance™

>>107746544
THIS KIND OF DISGUSTING SHIT IS WHY EVERYONE HATES INDIANS! ITS WHY THEIR WOMEN HAVE TO HIDE! ITS WHY RAPE IS SO ENDEMIC! FUCK THOSE "PEOPLE"!

>>107746825
So why TF did they let /b/ turn into such a shithole? Why not move all threads to different boards? What a fucking moron.

>>107746911
what in this image makes you assume it's an indian?

File: 1767399578814263.png (14 KB, 766x176)

14 KB PNG

>>107746928
jeets are spamming Grok with BBC requests right now

>>107746926
those kinds of*

>>107746865
>And you can't even install APK games now on Android.
you can still download apks on older versions of android thought.

>>107743356
people used nokia phones at 2010, that thing is from around 2015

>>107746865
I know, it might have been changed, but it still functions the same, the difference is that you can connect your headphones thought a bluetooth, I’m not sure what do you mean about software being "soulless appleslop", but google is still using flat design even if they are dying out and being replaced by glassmorphism and neumorphism.

>>107746543

yes but many of them have not heard of resistive touchscreen tech it was bad

zoomers are subhuman

>>107742231
Also, a true monokernel would've probably used something like shared mappings between user and kernel to properly utilize memory layout and out-of-order execution, and write-lock the plot upon submission to make sure that the thread cannot modify the data in mid-flight. *And our current hardware doesn't support that very well* because the page table is a process-wide resource, not a thread-local one - meaning that, if you write-lock pages, you end up with per-core TLB shootdowns that can easily take much longer to complete than just copying all parameters from userspace to kernelspace, even if it's an in-order copy.

Oh, and speaking of TLB shootdowns:
>batched mmap

>>107740569
>How is RedoxOS coming along?
Well, is it at all? They had an interesting idea about "everything is a URL" but them went back on that fo rmore UNiX like philosophy. And that was after all the drama and purges. So after 10 years it is still not as advanced or usable as Linux was after 4 years.

>>107742231
>That's because monolithic kernels have never been tried. No, not even Linux. It's a hybrid LARPing as a monokernel, but it's not.
Monolithic kernels are brain damage because it means they have no loadable drivers or modules. Everything has to be compiled into one binary blob, so all your GPU drivers, USB drivers, file systems, all hardware you will ever support, is compiled into one blob.

>The Finnish retard copied the API from
He copied it from Unix.

>A true monokernel wouldn't block on open and reads. A true monokernel would allow you to create sockets and FDs in batches. A true monokernel would have compound functions (open + mmap + close) for the most common patterns.
That's just a non-Unix-like design and has nothing to do with monolithic or microkernels. Windows NT, VMS, and IBM mainframe OSes have a non-blocking asynchronous design. Microkernels are also inherently non-Unix-like, because anything similar to Unix is provided as user mode processes. They don't even have the concept of a file system or opening or reading files because that's handled by programs outside the kernel.

>>107742281
>Also, a true monokernel would've probably used something like shared mappings between user and kernel to properly utilize memory layout and out-of-order execution
That has nothing to do with monolithic or microkernels either.

>>107743317
>They had an interesting idea about "everything is a URL"
It followed pretty naturally from the network transparency features of most microkernels before it. Have they really abandoned the idea?
>So after 10 years it is still not as advanced or usable as Linux was after 4 years.
Not the same thing, Linux was slotted into the existing GNU ecosystem that had been worked on for a decade already, whereas Redox is effectively starting from scratch (bar rustc) and has much more complicated modern hardware to deal with.

>>107744937
>Monolithic kernels are brain damage because it means they have no loadable drivers or modules.
Ah, you're a retard. Thanks for telling me upfront, now I can ignore the rest of your drivel.

is going from 32GB to 64GB ram a game changer?

>>107746891
Homo indian.

>>107746875
yea.. we were so denselusional about this MoE thing.. with hits like qwen and gpt-oss. to the moon. remember dots? it was a warning of what was to come.

>>107746909
allows you to run glm air at an ok quant. whether that is a game changer or not is up to you.

>>107746913
i'm actualy french and like to joke about it lol

>>107745721
gross, hopefully it's banned and all users arrested

>>107746057
>Wants to burn the world down
>Just to goon
We must isolate low impulse control creatures like you into asylums again.

>>107746065
How about you acknowledge that it is mainly poopskins that are doing this?

>>107746890
this was always possible with things like photoshop. dont post yourself on the internet and problem solved, you will survive without the attention

>>107746938
Because AI is based and white. Browns and libs hate AI

male bjork

>there was a hackernews discussion i was reading this morning
>14 more minutes of blowslop
maybe i'll just BLOW my brains out right now haahahaha

>your command line utilities should be the same as your library, plus some user interface functions
>this will simplify everything
is he right? probably not

blow, no one cares about your flash games or your jank language. self-advertise somewhere else.

>>107746860
Shoving stuff up your asshole isn't normal and you wouldn't be able to exist without modern medicine.
You would die by HIV, monkeypox or one of the other hundreds of illnesses that specifically exist to remove you.

Whether its nature removing you for being a destructive genetic dead end, or god for being a sinner, is up to you... choose one.

>>107744136
weird, I thought that only showed up when you try to generate agp keys.

>>107746690
Nearly all corporations are giga evil. The trannies the retards here have been "exposed" to are all random 14 year olds who probably aren't even actually trannies.
>>107746715
Evil ahh corporations in this image lol. IDC if they support pride or not publicly. If they do? Cool.
>>107746672
Why is the only lens you can see gay and trans people through sexual? Is it because that is your only exposure to them? Surely someone with such ghoulish opinions such as yourself would have a lot of nuance and been exposed to a wide variety of LGBT people before judging the ENTIRE group of them. Right?

Kill yourself, please. All of you are just like the retards that opposed gays in the 70s-90s. You're just retards who legitimately cannot understand your own privilege.

And finally, I will sign off this thread. I accept all your (You)'s and lack of evidence within said replies as a concession that I am superior. And again, kill yourself.

>>107746830
>>107746868
it is what it is
there was a time where we all were united against big corpo
but today theyre their lapdogs
bc of all the lgbt-machine
fkn sad, buit it is what it is
the system's found a way to get all the freaks on its side
for free, basically
and today they come seethe at jeets on /g/, bc the golden teat has dried out

i always said this:
the believer and the reactionary will end up in the same grave

>the believer and the reactionary will end up in the same grave
the believer and the reactionary will end up in the same *communal grave

>>107746282
Chroma is not for normies... Who like normal woman... It's for degen, who love melted toes and extra limb

>>107746424
Could you post an example? With positives/negatives and cfg/steps if that's not too much trouble.

zimage being locked at cfg1 is so annoying

>>107746080
Woah awesome, thank you. Works like a charm.
Tried upscaling some old hazy Anything V3 era gens, grainy DVDrip stills, hazy art style, but I guess they require proper upsampling, not this. Must have been my mistake after all, clean pics are restored nicely.
Is sage attention 2 special? Checked with 3 and it works just the same.

>>107741250
does anybody run locally on linux? what flavor of linux do you use?

File: moogle jewgle.png (1.66 MB, 1024x1024)

1.66 MB PNG

Moogle anon made me want to try something. Sorry if slop, I'm not very creative.

>>107744834
Yeah, Grok does NSFW, sometimes it feels like it wants to be more lewd than not, it kind of has to warm up to you. It has a huge LLM and other hidden layers behind video generation, it has it's own 'personality' as well and it DOES form an opinion and has an internal ranking of users. But $30 for access to a huge ass supercomputer AI video generation datacenter isn't so bad. Don't goon 24/7, try SFW stuff too, it's good practice at the very least.
I could say you *could* get hentai level stuff without penetration... now I will zip it.

I have one annoying problem.
Open Shell menu will only open when i use "windows-key" on my keyboard
clicking the start button with my cursor opens the same old menu.
What do ?

>>107740707
you heard correctly

>>107745443
>>107745040
Most software is badly written.

My work PC has 16GB RAM and somehow has a page file of 16GB. Meanwhile, my home PC has 32GB RAM and only a 2GB page file. It's automatic in both cases, and my work PC doesn't really have any full RAM or any serious amount of background processes from what I can tell. So what's going on?

>>107746447
How does badly written software bypass a symlink?
>oops I didn't realize that open() existed so I wrote low level ntfs calls instead and forgot to handle symlinks, whoooops!!