Rockchip's Media Process Platform repo got DMCAd by FFmpeg. SBC users in shambles.https://github.com/github/dmca/blob/master/2025/12/2025-12-18-ffmpeg.md
>>107679133>le heckin cuck license is real freedom n shieet reeeeeKek>But sitting there, quietly powering masses of the internet, without saying boo to a goose, is FreeBSD. And the companies using it? They’re not talking about it. Why? Because they don’t have to. The simple fact that dawned on me is FreeBSD’s gift to us all, yet Achilles heel to itself, is its license.>Unlike the GPL, which requires you to share derivative works, the BSD license doesn’t. You can take FreeBSD code, build on it, and never give anything back. This makes it a great foundation for products — but it also means there’s little reason for companies to return their contributions.https://freebsdfoundation.org/blog/the-report-of-my-death-was-an-exaggeration/
>>107676226The copyright system turned on its head, love to see it
>>107676226wait so what does this mean? I can't use FFMPEG on my Rockchip-based SBCs?
>pirating open source softwareshiggy diggy
>>107679161Multiple megabytes of resident proprietary blobs in UEFI and integrated Malware Engine vs. few kilobytes of boot code.
Will 2026 finally be the year of the RISC desktop?
>>107676506Prism can run x86 on ARM with no problems. It's honestly the only good thing Microsoft has made this decade.
LoonGoon
>>107676706>a chip is a scam>fab houses>>107676506>windowslowest iq monkey gibberish i've seen all day
>>107676506People who use RISC won't use Windows
>>107676454my ereader is risc v, but I don't think I have any other risc v devices. all my computer's except my desktop run arm however (apple m4 and tensor g5)I'd love a cheap RISC v desktop but I don't think there's any in a usable state just yet
A few of you may have discovered today that thumbnails suddenly stopped loading in Firefox. I did.Checking the browser console, I found errors for each thumbnail in the catalog which said "A resource is blocked by OpaqueResponseBlocking, please check browser console for details."After disabling browser.opaqueResponseBlocking in about:config, those error messages turned into 403's and the images would still not load.I did a desuarchive search for Firefox and found a post in /trash/ saying "I figured it out. 4chan is now asking for referrers when requesting images from 4cdn... TL:DR; 4chan wants to know where you were before loading an image." along with a screenshot of all about:config settings with the word "referer" in them.With the help of that screenshot, I pinpointed the issue to network.http.referer.XOriginPolicy in about:config, which I had set to 2 for whatever reason, I don't know. Setting it to 0 fixed the problem.Most of you on Firefox probably won't experience this since 0 is the default setting.So, for those of you also experiencing this issue, there's the fix, and now the fix is on desuarchive for others to find.Feel free to discuss the technological/privacy ramifications of this change by 4chan, or if the /trash/ poster's analysis is correct.
>>107668537I tried changing this referer setting but i pretty much immediately had problems with yt embeds. There should be a setting that blocks the referer for top level page navigation but still sends it for embeds where it's arguably useful.
>>107676985Just browse incognito so the pics are purged from your browser.
this analytic feature is here to stay chuddies. why are you so afraid? we already have given glowflare free access to our asshole.
>>107675592>imblying anyone without brain-cells would be running a debian based system...
Ze jews must die for what they've done to firefox
>>107679378The boomers have always been helpless so im ignoring them, let them become schizophrenic. As for the zoomers, they may not care right now but they will jump on the virtue signal train when the time is right, there just needs to be one event that blows it up (like George Floyd). Though i admit that this may not happen
>>107661713KEK... they got fucked by something as simple as screenshot. As those retards didn't know why NFT's failed in first place they have 0 value and this is exactly same 0 protection.
>>107675304this is definitely bait lmaoI LOVE these sneaky fucks poisoning leftist brains
>>107679439What sort of event could spark such an outrage? It would have to be something like microsoft copilot blowing up a nuclear reactor. I don't see people in real life taking strong anti-AI positions, I see them reluctantly accepting their note taking app pestering them with AI suggestions. It's an annoyance on the same level as ads in the start menu but people lied down and took that so I don't see this being any different.
>>107679477Could be anything ranging from a celebrity disliking it, a political figure they hate championing it, respected low level careers being taken and yeah, blowing up a nuclear reactor would work tooEvents that blow up are completely random. Going back to George, apparently about 600 black people are killed by cops per year yet George is the one that blew up for some reason. I cannot predict the spark but my intuition tells me its possible
Thoughts on the elitebook?
>>107678731I'm trying to figure out why I would waste $200 on a 15yo boat anchor on with 50% of its parts on the edge of failure, when I can get something infinitely superior by every objective metric for the same money.Or am I missing some weapons-grade "old good new bad" babyduckism here?
>>107679362To steel man his position, if you really need 1tb+ of local storage, this isn't so easy to get along with a decent used, new laptop for ~$200 unless you'll settle for random eBay HDDs. But you won't find a 1tb 2.5" SSD for $50 as in image either. I'm still using an upgraded t440p so I sympathize with the idea but it's easy to not know the "meta" of best used laptop value, it feels like t440ps are now worth less than a hundred bucks where they were worth $200 a year or two ago. T480s used to be closer to $400. Etc. it changes with time
>>107660876Where's the middle mouse button?
>>107679448press both at the same time
>>107679541I said middle mouse button, not emulation.
I legitimately can not discern the difference between 128kbps audio and anything higher bitrate. For years I've seen anons argue about 320kbps, FLAC, WAV, and so forth. But honest to God, the difference to my ears is near imperceptible. I listen to headphones for 8+ hours every day, and even I can't tell the difference. Sure my equipment is not top-tier, but I doubt that explains it.For my favorite music, I can just about tell the difference between 128kbps and 320kbps. Like if I really try hard. But anything above that.. forget it. I really feel people are lying when they claim they are able to hear nuances beyond 320kbps. I believe higher than 320kbps is hardcore placebo-tier and people who hoard FLACs are raping their limited storage capacity for no reason.What do you think? Is the audiophile culture plagued by lying cocksuckers, or do some people have golden ears?
>>107677948I think you're colordeaf
>>107677878It’s not really about the sound. It’s that it gives me peace of mind knowing I have my music in the best format possible and keeping anything else just feels redundant. Plus I’m not a poorfag so storage isn’t that much of a concern. Hell I'd even keep my music in .wav format if they were readily availablet. former mp3 connoisseur
>>107679470Same. Once you go FLAC, there's no turning back.
>>107677878128kb audio sounds shit on large speakers, if it's a concert with lots of speakers, you will hear the difference, but honestly with headphones you can't tell.
>>107679470me too, I used to have all my music in mp3 (ripped myself) and I thought 160/192 kbps was plenty.. A few years ago I ripped all my cd's and vinyl AGAIN this time in flac.. it took me over 6 months of free weekends and evenings to get it done with.. Now I carry my music in flac.. I can fit about 500 albums in 150GB
Made in USA editionHow to request advice:>Location (since pricing and availability may vary)>Budget>What exactly you're looking for (be as detailed as possible)>Previous gear and your thoughts on it>Open back wired headphones• Hifiman HE400se• Sennheiser HD 560S• Sennheiser HD 6XX (US)• FiiO FT1 Pro>Closed back wired headphones• Shure SRH440A/SRH840AComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>107679323ok thank you
>>107679323but wait.. hasn't this all been figured out by now? How has this not become a commodity technology by now? Basically all the same? Are they still making advancements in converting bits to analog electrical signals?
>>107679499better quality sound needs more expensive parts so they cheap out
>>107679499It's less about advances or differences in technology and more about how much money they want to spend to minimise the impact of all the things that can deteriorate the quality of the signal.
>>107679518>>107679528ok thanks, I guess that makes sense
Is this future of employment? https://x.com/breaking911/status/2004262355195380047
>>107672979Is this shocking to anyone? Of course remotely operated infrastructure will be operated from overseas.
>>107673028Honestly if I had to choose between dirt cheap jeet labor and having to pay out the ass to hire lazy fat Ameritards, I'd probably go with the jeets too.
It's better than having to deal with thishttps://www.youtube.com/shorts/3gEgSUyrpu4
>>107676908today. in vegas
>>107678643>the customer's voiceI side with the wagie, though he shouldn't be spazzing out and crying. Groids with impulse control but lots of spite love to pressure white wagies for preferential treatment.
I'd just like to take a moment to shout out the new gooner chrome feature called Split View. It's surprisingly intuitive.
>>107673408Case of use?
>>107673408this is the most retarded shit ive seen this week and i work with special needs kids
>>107678037jacking off, I use them as displaying a sequence of events with ease, or lining up images of the same fetish and making a visual collage that takes away from one image and expands another in the areas I desire. It's nice not using anything separate, it's all within chrome context menus
>>107674663>IncognitoI love hanging out with 1337 haxors
>>107673408MS Edge has had this for five years.Congrats chrome-tards, you caught up.
Discussion of Free and Open Source Text-to-Image/Video ModelsPrev: >>107671064https://rentry.org/ldg-lazy-getting-started-guide>UIComfyUI: https://github.com/comfyanonymous/ComfyUISwarmUI: https://github.com/mcmonkeyprojects/SwarmUIre/Forge/Classic/Neo: https://rentry.org/ldg-lazy-getting-started-guide#reforgeclassicneoSD.Next: https://github.com/vladmandic/sdnextWan2GP: https://github.com/deepbeepmeep/Wan2GP>Checkpoints, LoRAs, Upscalers, & Workflowshttps://civitai.comComment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>107679512Luckily, it doesn't even have a trigger.Looks like qwen is trying to save xmas.
>>107665458kek, got his ass
>>107679533>>107679308>>107679253>>107679220>>107679208>>107679033>>107678708it was worth it, bros
>>107679276That's a coin toss. More denoising is needed, at it may still flip even with most modest denoising effort. >>107679308>no idea what that meansIf you want to test his hypothesis out, the easiest way is to switch to beta scheduler and then decrease flow shift step by step.
>>107679547You can split sigmas to skip the problem step, or adjust it. You are using fixed seeds hopefully. This is on a seed+prompt basis.
No one gives a shit if a game or program is 99% AI code, but if any part of the front end is touched by AI it's time to riot.Far more people's jobs are at risk from AI language related tasks but the entire anti ai movement is based on shitty twitter artists doodles
>>107678974AI for me but not for thee.
>>107678974But what about people who just want images being created and don't care if it's by a person? Gooners for example.Really to me the underlying issue is and always will be that corporations see it as a tool to replace people, rather than augment productivity. That is what sours AI impressions on people more than anything else. Simple corporate shortsighted greed.
>>10767911490% of the people complaining about AI have never worked for a corporation that thinks that way about artists.
>>107679162Even so they see it happening, and the fear sets in. It's no different than the fearful devs on here.There is zero trust in companies to think of their employees in America particularly, and even so in the wider Anglo world. It's why there's such a large negative view on it from the English speaking world and on the English speaking interenet.A tool is only as good as the person using it as they say.
>>107678830>making shit upE33 got it's GOTY stripped off some small niche award platformIt still has all of it's awards including GOTY from Geoff's The Game Awards
>Implying the new puzzle Captcha isn't fun
>>107678341/b/tards tend to be /b/tards, anon
I don't get the dices one. Quick rundown on what I should be looking for?
>>107678516The one with the most amount of blank squares.
>>107671050>you cannot restrict me from posting when I've done my partNo?
>>107670788Why would /g/ ever try to block streetshitters?They stink, they're poor, they're useless, they breed like locusts, and they're Troonix users.They're THE /g/ demographic.
They removed right alt and context menu for this useless bullshit, and it's hard wired to send a weird three key combination so that you can't even rebind it to right-ctrl properly.It's such a dumb hack, doesn't Microsoft have any competent engineers anymore?
>>107679433I fucking hate thisWhat the fuck Microsoft.
>>107679301how is that key working on linux?
>>107679433shift+f10 should still work on windows.. I think
>>107679415Wouldn't AHK remap that just fine?
>>107679442The end result will be all input>AI>output.People will no longer talk about using computers, this hardware, that software or OS. It will be a full abstraction through different AI personalities, which given enough time would culminate in one.
mornin' retards and alikeprev >>107602756
>>107679354the background doesn't have any sort of coherence with the UII dont even care about the anime slopbut you could have still used that background and done a better job>heh Ill post this bait and then they'll reply to me >:^))))DRATS I fell for it again
>>107679405It's not bait though. Perhaps I should have tried a lighter theme instead?What do you think?
>>107679444just based on the visible colors I would go for something like>cream and similar off-white colors as the main color>red text like this or somethingthe colors in your wallpaper are mostly warm flesh tones with a lot of red highlights
>>107679354fine ill install emascsorry i mean emacs
>>107679216feh just "won" when I needed a very lightweight image viewer /and/ a way to set backgrounds for Openbox. It's proven to have been a gud way to go other than it won't play animated gifs, which is something I /very/ rarely need, and when I do I can just open it with Firefox.
what is to be done? #0we all hate Web2.0 and 3.0 is a dead circus. This general is for the organising theory and action for an effective resistance to the current internet age we exist in.Thread rules:>This thread is NOT for left-right, racial or elitist shitflinging, this is for proper debate and organising against big tech, conversations related to the previous topics is encouraged where it will produce effective visions for what we want to see>This thread is for LEGAL or gray area activity and organising, Jannies are encouraged to delete or ban people arguing for DDOSing, targetted scamming or any other illicit strategies>This thread is NOT for web1.0 nostalgiafagging. The only reason normies and tards are dreamgazing at yesteryear's cyberspace is solely due to how shit our modern one isrecommend guides, resources and recs for normies looking to become tech competent and join the conversation:>to be added
>>107679116build local alternatives that are better than the othersfor example a facebook for your little town
>>107679128impractical. facebook and other big tech shit only became as big as they are (and staying where they are) via having the pull to force everyone to come to them because all their friends were there, see DISCORD for a modern example
>>107679154its not impractical its trivial to do and most people would appreciate just talking to people in their own townyou dont need every single person in town to use it, slow and steady growth and then it becames a staple of the communityjust keep making excuses for actual solutions though faggot
>>107679373>its not impractical its trivial to do and most people would appreciate just talking to people in their own townIt is trivial to do, and it sounds good on paper, but come on. Something this trivial has been attempted before. People have making "the alternative Facebook" thousands of times, and you never heard about it because nobody actually used or appreciated it. Facebook using normies just use the "[town] Facebook Group" page. They're not looking to sign up for something else. And people like me, who never used Facebook, are never going to use your alternative because people like us never liked the idea of that kind of social media to begin with. I'm already on Element/Matrix instead of Discord, I don't use Google for anything, and I of course don't use Microsoft products. Unfortunately these alternatives only appeal to tech nerds, and so they're completely useless for communicating with your normie friends and family.
