>>107596111
Whatever you say, Mohammed.

>>107596111
I agree that banning public prayer is kinda retarded when you could just ban jews, muslims and hindus instead, they don't belong in the country anyway
Its insanity that white people's countries are now supposed to be for everyone because jews told us so, we should stop listening to jews and send everyone back to their own homes

>>107596111
>Don't blame all Muslims
mudslime can go back to a mudslime country to have their shitty religion, we can only have our countries to not have their shitty religion. Islam should be completely illegal anywhere it's not the dominant force because it's not really a religion at all.

>>107592547
Ah yes, the good old
>there already is some amount of (bad thing), therefore your argument against massively larger versions of (bad thing) is irrelevant or something
argument.

>>107586979
>does not advance discourse in any meaningful way

he says while telling everyone to close their eyes as the noose is firmly being wrapped around their necks. The demand for "constructive critism" is the battle cry of the insincere shill. The only way to influence people is to use emotionally fueled arguements, the time for calm, rational and logical discourse ended when half the population was replaced with forigners.

>>107596111
Islam is incompatible with western values and every single muslim represents a sleeper agent that will cut your head off if the propper circumstances happen. Every country where muslims have gained significant influence demonstrate this. You talk about being honest with dialog and then you pull this shit.

>>107592054
>Before... What? Precisely?

the right to privacy is enshrined in the bill of rights. It was only within the context of the digital age that the government was able to get public support for the eroding of it. First to combat illegal pornographic content, and later to fight terrorism. Then someone realized they could just get corporations to violate the constitutional restricts since they technically didnt apply to corporations due to semetic magic and its been all down hill since then.

Heres an example of how things have changed: Did you know, one of the major reasons people didnt want to give up windows XP and switch to newer versions such as Win7 was because win7 did the horribly invasive thing of... phoning home one time to microsoft to verify that you had a registered version of windows? People considered that a huge violation of your privacy since it was involuntary and they felt offended that microsoft was no longer going to trust them to just type in a valid CD Key. Now 15 years later and windows 11 actively phones home every day. It spies on everything you do, reports you to the government, and will actively delete files from your computer if microsoft deems them unnecesary.

I'm having a hell of a time installing drivers for some antique controller cards for some industrial machines on some antique computers. One one machine the drivers don't automatically install (and if manually installed the application acts as if they didn't) , on the other, drivers install but the application acts as if they didn't.
I know you won't have a complete solution, but I'm just trying to narrow down what could be going wrong. We can't wait months for them to build us a new controller.
Could the Windows XP service pack and specific collection of updates be affecting something like that?
Could installing the wrong motherboard (or chipset) drivers cause either error? I'm really confident that I haven't done this because I can still get them off the manufacturer's website (they're freaking dells), but management has jumped to this conclusion and won't be talked out of it, insisting on trying to buy two new (old) XP computers as if we're just going to magically get the "insert cd, run installer, and it'll jest werks" experience we deserve instead of continuing to struggle.

I tried out Stardock Fences and now it's impossible to remove/uninstall even though I disabled it on Startup, it doesn't show in Add/Remove programs. What should I do?

File: Screenshot 2025-12-18 185948.png (57 KB, 812x510)

57 KB PNG

Why is the iot iso bigger than the non iot iso?

after the update, samsung magician just loads infinitely. tried uninstalling, deleting all the settings i could find, clean registry etc. even installing an older 8.3 version behaves the same now. dont really understand how this is possible

>>107597548
what version of Windows are you using? if you run control panel then go to uninstall a program, is it in there?

>>107582604
I had a similar experience except I couldnt finish the IQ test because I was told that I would just be a questionnaire thing and I was on shitty mobile internet which was good enough for a video call but clearly not good enough for their stupid shape matching test because it kept freezing up and then crashing

>>107588106
>>107588716
I kept getting ones that didn't have unique dot counts. I'd get 3 pairs, or 2 pairs and a triplet with the occasional pair and triplet mixed in. I thought it had to do with the positioning because the only time I was getting stuff "correct" was when I was finding ones that didn't have a dot in the same spot, but then that stopped working after I got 7 in a row, so I guess I just got lucky.

>>107589802
I'm still getting ones that don't have unique dot counts occasionally. I'd probably still be lost if I didn't check in on this thread. Still have to reroll because of the dots, but at least I know it's just fucked and there isn't some secret pattern with the average color of the background the dots are touching or something equally asinine.

testicles

File: 1766108185193447.jpg (20 KB, 319x475)

20 KB JPG

test

>>107582604
the annoying thing is that it says "find the image not like the others" and instead of having 4 identical ones with 1 odd one out they have 2 identical pairs with 1 unique one. so you have to scroll through all of them instead of immediately identifying the weird one after looking through 3

>>107597564
Using NFC would be more safer than having a pattern printed in the key card.

>>107598021
>The card slots will have a square grid array of touch contacts like bank card terminals.
I was to understand, unlike the chip on the bank card, your card is just a single conductor... The array in your setup is just about keeping power from pins?
In which case that mask - and damage to, over time - will become a factor. Especially with home-printed materials.

> Diagram is for 2x2, real thing would be 5x5.
Explains why there's not enough for a 5x5 grid.

>>107598141
You will see the rub damage accumulate. You can print a new mask on label paper from Kinkos, punch out the holes, cut the label, then apply new label to card. Point is to delete Mr. Shekelsberg-Manufacturergee and his proprietary wares from the keying equation.

>>107598135
Need universal machines with firmware you don't control, radios you might not be able to source, etc.

>>107598161
>delete Mr. Shekelsberg-Manufacturergee and his proprietary wares from the keying equation.
You'd be 'better' avoiding electronics altogether here.
But my point in mentioning the damages was for the times when you're already out of the house when this occurs. Assuming this is door entry to building.
If this can lock you outta house, really wise to consider failure modes.

>>107598164
"universal machine"?
depending on what you mean by 'firmware' that might be a solvable problem. As for the radio, that's easily buildable... It's just cheaper, smaller and easier to buy.
But I wouldn't advise NFC. Can have people picking that lock from ½ way down the street...

meanwhile, in the prc

>>107595505
>don't make my website open source
>people still find vulnerabilities in it, because javascript obfuscation barely does anything
is this the power of closed source?
>be open or closed source
>have a bug bounty program
>now people will report vulns they find instead of sitting on them or exploiting them
is this the power of paying a fair price for labour?

>>107596719
>picrel
is that from auschwitz?

>>107597666
>is this the power of paying a fair price for labour?
in fact the bug bounty programs are incredibly cheap you get the best of best hacking your stuff and submitting fixes for few thousands which for big companies might as well be pennies
like remember they're paying h1b jeets hundreds of thousands per year to pretend to be working or vibecode some retarded broken shit because the big companies have been turned into h1b scam pipelines where jeet HRs recruit their own from india and get kickbacks from the salary, they're looting the companies for millions and millions in salaries

meanwhile some actually mega skilled coder from eastern europ doesnt get paid any salary but only for results and he gets paid few thousand per some critical bug and does more for the company than 10 salaried jeets do for fraction the price

>>107595503
well no shit dumbass. GPL is based on the correct principle that NOT distributing the source along with the binary requires either social or technical hacks or both that do not need to be tolerated. GPL assumes no distinction between source and binary except possible user convenience and distribution pattern. there is no technical difference, they are both "the software" so they by all reason should both be distributed to anyone the software is available to.

NOTHING in GPL prevents you from closed betas, only collabing with a small group, only releasing to a small group of users. and says nothing about keeping secrets. you can keep all the secrets you want. but to whomever you give the software out, DO NOT use slimy tricks against them to restrict their access to only a side-effect of your code (compiled binary). you are doing them a disservice.

>>107595794
Come to Brazil

>>107597187
He then proceeded to kill a bunch of people by firing the people responsible for early warning systems for extreme weather events right before a hurricane.

>>107597347
kek
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43chLSam9RE

File: 1765672423495145.jpg (279 KB, 750x1027)

279 KB JPG

>>107595794
sneed. feed. seed.

>>107595794
YOU FUCKING NIGGER

>>107597726
Don't care
I'm phone posting with Chance

>>107597726
Works on my machine

>>107597726
works on my machine, but I do hate this captcha

File: 4ch_jeeted.png (3.88 MB, 3244x2529)

3.88 MB PNG

>>107597726
>Investigate and remove the Indian Hindu rape rat jannies who have infiltrated inside 4chan and censored and ruined the boards, while helping their fellow cockroaches evade bans and spam? Nah
>Remove old boards and the "racism outside of /b/" rules that help rapejeet jannies ruin the 4chan culture? Nah
>Banning spammers and bots? Nah

Obviously this is what will fix 4chan

>>107597726
>new CAPTCHA
is absolutely devious.
It feels like taking an IQ test, so every time you "pass," you get a dopamine hit.

>>107598034
You're dumb and probably gay.

i remember when the internet was a wild west RATting was normal, you could even have 100 people to spy on easily

now i imagine it never happens

>>107598034
haha OP I love froggo XD

>>107598034
P@ssw0rd1
PsW000001
PlzLetMeIn99

Wish I had the attention span to read them.

File: 1739298444984629.png (7 KB, 700x700)

7 KB PNG

>>107598177

>>107598226
Bee boop

>>107596657
the new captcha keeps the jeets away so it's good

>>107598204
lmao you fucking wish

>>107596657
Cuckflare offer free captcha.

>>107596657
kept getting bypassed

>>107597181
bubbly

File: derp.jpg (48 KB, 800x450)

48 KB JPG

I might be an idiot and I don't know why.
I just spent a good while making a bash script to compare two video files to see which one is better quality.
Pretty simple right? Just use ffmpeg to measure PSNR or SSIM or VMAF.
Well for some reason I decided fuck that I'll do it my own ass backwards way.
My way consists of extracting individual frames from each video at specified timestamps (let's say every 10% of the duration) and then comparing each one using imagemagick to compare with rmse and generate a report with the score for each compared frame and a final average score across all extracted frames. If the current frames have a large discrepancy in their scores it creates an A/B image for manual inspection. If the average scores is good the report says keep the new version, otherwise keep the old.

What the fuck was my problem?
Why didn't I just use the normal methods?
I knew about VMAF etc beforehand but I didn't use it.
There was a reason and I can't remember at all why.
Anyone here know their shit about ffmpeg and imagemagick who can shed some light on why I wouldn't have used ffmpeg and whether or not my method is a complete waste of time that doesn't produce useful data?

>>107597733
And now I posted with grammar mistakes and typos out the ass.
I might genuinely be having a stroke.

Finished my CS courses with a ChoHan game.
Now I just need physics and calculus for my degree.

>>107598019
Theory: AI is their personal obsession since they were a kid, from the movies to books, etc. That's why they care so much, so they can get their names in the history books as the ones who ushered it in

>>107598157
possible. I've seen a lot of smart personal assistant shit in past Sci-fi
and there has been a lot of shilling for google now and siri back in 2013 enough to make them make cortana.

You are posting in a Pajeet_Nation xitter content farm thread

File: 1742746154217736.gif (1.78 MB, 250x250)

1.78 MB GIF

>>107598019
Genuinely believe Microsoft is handing PCs to Linux at this point.

https://www.engadget.com/ai/lg-quietly-added-an-unremovable-microsoft-copilot-app-to-tvs-235923754.html

People aren't buying it, so now they're betting on shoving it down our throats in the hopes of creating a dependency so to be able to profit of it later.

>>107596258
listen to yourself defending garbage design. absolute cooksucker

File: Apple iPhone 4s vs Apple (...).png (542 KB, 1410x1069)

542 KB PNG

>>107596387
>they probably could've had a sweet flush phone partway between these two
The iPhone 6s?

File: schwab.png (206 KB, 465x445)

206 KB PNG

>>107596106
>The USB-C port is already too thick for the new generation of tri-folds.
You know what that means. Mandatory wireless charging!

>>107595967
Make the rest of the phone 1/8th inch thicker to match the camera.

>>107596258
clown option: Network with nearby phones to share cameras and composite the image together from them similar to how telescope arrays work.

Shitposts aside, I'm honestly somewhat surprised that they don't put sensors on two bands further apart. I suppose it's only a matter of time until a phone shaped like a dog bone becomes a thing. It's the only "real" way to cheat the physics.