File: satanichia.png (249 KB, 670x670)

249 KB PNG

>>107743069
nevermind, 22H2 does nothing for composition apparently
at least now I have the latest thing™

>>107743069
>>107743102
22h2 doesn't get updates anymore baka

File: 1503039950579.jpg (272 KB, 540x517)

272 KB JPG

>>107743124
time to rollback I see
thanks

File: thissucks.gif (1.67 MB, 220x208)

1.67 MB GIF

>playing around with a copy of 21h2 on a VM
>try creating a separate partition on C to hold the entire user folder to include appdata
>according to microsoft's own documentation the OS supports sym links with the mklink command
>try it out for pure shits and giggles
>symlink the old appdata folder from the root windows partition to the seperate user partition with the new appdata folder
>also update the corresponding registry keys to point to the new folder on the user partition i made
>reboot
>like half the OS works fine and the other half like installing programs with .exes is just broken despite there being no real reason it shouldnt be working according to microsoft's own documentation
this OS sucks so bad how can a modern operating system not support symbolic links

>>107740707
enterprise or iot enterprise ltsc
>>107742478
if you have windows 10 drivers

>>107743985
a 10% space gain from compression is impressive and hard to believe, especially happening practically overnight

>>107744056
well, that's why mine is wrong about free space. at least it's not as optimistic as the LTO specs.

>>107744086
well shit

>>107743668
Just pick up an HP slim shitbox and ziptie the drives inside. Thats what i did

File: niaty.jpg (7 KB, 307x164)

7 KB JPG

>>107744704
>HP

You're telling me now, after all this time, that there was a way for a video to change its size during playback, and not a single platform uses this to accomodate phone videos which are rotated partway into the video?
Son of a bitch.

File: Gt_GWFRa0AA1Rli.jpg (37 KB, 800x450)

37 KB JPG

>>107743694

>>107743694
At $1000 a month, I think Indians would unironically be cheaper as long as you have them work remote. The effects on product quality would be roughly equivalent.

>>107740917
Looked interesting until they started saying "it is designed to be a companion to your phone" bro BlackBerry was making serious phones that were better than everything else on the market at one point

File: thanks reddit.jpg (46 KB, 220x345)

46 KB JPG

>... yes. Yes, he is actually just that stupid.
>Don't worry, I'm already pointing my finger at you laughing. No need to reply.

File: 1756044649728605.jpg (256 KB, 1080x1959)

256 KB JPG

>>107744510
How?

>>107732712
You got proven wrong kid.

>>107741313
You explained the baker of spg kek

>>107742981

IT tried to give me one of those goobers so I requested a TB5 Plugable dock instead.

>>107742981
How are these for inference?

>>107743861
It's just a laptop dock

>>107744057
What happens if you connect it to a desktop?

>>107744556
You get the extra ports that your thunderbolt host controller supports

File: f3f68c4fda58ff4a.jpg (404 KB, 1659x1249)

404 KB JPG

>>107742502

I wish I could use qubesOS but it's such a hodgepodge mess I don't really have much faith in it's security
I'll just have to stick to OpenBSD if I want a secure system

>>107743951
i didn't know /g/ was full of security experts

>>107743951
well qubes is just a linux distro with some virtual machines preconfigured
you can probably replicate the same system on bsd

File: 1767388043551852.jpg (22 KB, 400x400)

22 KB JPG

>i NEED security
>for what purpose
>to doomscroll /g/ and goon to niñas

>>107742140
Not bad. If I had a spare $400 (and a job) I"d probably jump on this. Hopefully we'll be able to install Lineage or Graphene on it by the time I can buy one...

>>107744014
why aren't you at work?

>>107743977
The Titan (2) has me very interested, but I can't justify getting one. I can't imagine it's that much better than a regular phone, and I think 400 is a waste for a gadget.

Where are the navigation buttons? Do they really expect people who buy a tactile phone to want gesture navigation?

>>107743363
poor termites, what do you feed them on?

>>107743448
If neural nets are a dead end, what do you think researchers should be looking into instead?

>>107743505
They should stop masturbating about stateless mathematical models (because both symbolic AI and neural networks are about logic and math not computing or programming) and start focusing on stateful programs that are actually agentic (in the original sense of the word not in the llm corrupted marketing sense) by having internal state, internal goals and a real model of the world (LeCun is right about this part), all of this not through mathematical models but through programming. If our current languages and databases are not enough then we should make progress there, for example by researching graph databases and new languages that make expressing complex and dynamic rules about the real world possible.
But corpos only want to sell their datacenter services, to them its a feature how inefficient LLMs are, and most researchers are not programmers they are stuck in their bubble of academia writing their papers in their ivory towers.

>>107743634
This guy's proposed alternative to neural nets is better programming languages and databases.
Absolutely fucking kek.

>>107743670
The connectionist idea that the brain is an input/output stateless machine is ridiculous and an insult to life.
Yes, the road to intelligence goes through stateful programming not through stateless mathematical models.
And yes, computer science has barely advanced at all in the last 40 years, but that's because all the resources are used on bullshit corporate or academic shit that is not even meant to advance it.

>>107743698
Apparently, actually most advanced (human like AI) Neurosama was coded in python and it didn't learn from LLMs, but from twitch chats only. Basically mogging all "AIs" while being made from scratch. It's not the same kind of "AI" but looks more like intelligence than the other ones.

>>>/pol/

>How long do you think this MLC SSD can last?
As long as you want, it depends on how much you write on it. I think it could last longer if you don't write that much to it and treat it read-only unless you have to really change things.

>MLC
No one will come come close with current TLC and QLC trash

File: LugervsHogan-1997.jpg (41 KB, 400x300)

41 KB JPG

For example, for decades professional sports were presented in interlaced video formats with 60 fields per second of motion smoothness.
Now, when those old tapes are converted and uploaded to streaming services 99% of the time they are only available in 30 frames per second. The two fields will have been blended together to make a frame. And they use pretty harsh methods to do it, because they want to get rid of all possible combing artifacts, so you get a much softer image than the original presentation. Detail is lost.

This "live sports" feel is lost in the process, and anyone who watched football, basketball, boxing, or pro wrestling in the 20th century can tell you how it used to look a lot better than what is on the streaming networks now, even if they can't describe the technical details.

File: Sony_PHDVM63DM_PHDVM_63DM(...).jpg (347 KB, 2857x1500)

347 KB JPG

>>107744065
>If it's shot on film or video it doesn't matter.
Yes it does! That makes a huge difference! The tape formats of the 70s through 2010s recorded in native interlaced video format.
The 60 fields per second smoothness is inherent to the format, and was preserved through the broadcasting signal chain.

>Lives were different though.
And live TV made up a massive amount of television history!

>>107744042
This isn't about nostalgia. This is about actual loss of information. You're being denied seeing the great majority of 20th century television as it was supposed to be seen.

What's pretty bad is if you search for 60 fps videos of old tv shows on youtube the majority of them have been converted to 60 fps via adding fake frames rather than using an original source.

If you want to see some examples of what 60 fields per second look like there is a channel on youtube called Reely Interesting. This person preserves the motion clarity of the original tapes by uploading in 4k 60 frames per second.

https://youtu.be/gDMtKrPYVjs

>>107740625
its for trannies to yap about how they can still watch csam on oldshitter hardware or something like that

>>107740605
narcissism

>>107741460
>aren’t modern SSDs faster than most DDR2
if you ignore the 1000x higher latency... sure.
>Is it possible to just bypass RAM
no.

>>107739307
And yet computers that played Youtube videos fine back then started to choke on the same resolutions as soon as the new non-Flash implementation came out, and still do.

>>107735998
ddr4 is good enough for me

>>107729874
It really isn't a real computer. You can't install a real os. You can't run a real development toolchain like gcc etc. You're locked into apple's bullshit and whatever limited set of commercial toy "apps" they've graciously allowed you to run on their appliance that you've leased from them for a one time fee.

1. This thing has a web broswer which probably supports wasm
2. You can run https://copy.sh/v86/ in a web browser
3. From 1 and 2 it follows that this machine is at least as capable as an old PC
4. Old PC is usable for writing software if your code and your tools are fast
5. From 3 and 4 it follows that this machine is perfectly usable for programming

>>107742334
> There's nothing wrong with the new generation of kids growing up on locked down toy appliances and never knowing what it's like to actually own and control your own property
yeah the world is fucked. this picture nails it >>107731253
Fuck that anons racism though

>>107742488
Really cool site, but its making even my desktop fans start spinning fast when I try to run the desktop environment on the Arch image. Crazy that this is even possible, but its not gonna work on an IPad.

>>107742507
>owning and controlling your property is lugging around 6 pounds of ewaste with 2 hours battery life
college isn’t a place to fiddle with your bashrc and audio drivers

>>107743458
"AI" is a marketing term

an unironic answer to this clearly bait thread for anyone who is wondering is noone who uses computer as a computer and needs his computer to do exactly what he wants will find anything that these glorified NN powered autocorrects can do useful

File: Only_the_dead_can_know_pe(...).jpg (48 KB, 500x490)

48 KB JPG

>>107743458
>AI is indispensable and the new default way to use computers.

File: notoaisloppa.jpg (393 KB, 1080x1482)

393 KB JPG

>>107743458
Ok. Still not using any applications that have "AI" (the lying if/else machine) in them.

Keep coping though...?

>>107743458
reminder ai is actual indians. and i agree. they are indispensable, sirs.

>>107743568
Everyone is using AI
Almost no one is paying for it
How is that hard to grasp?

>>107735283
use python instead like a sane person

>>107735080
you don't need to know the terminal if you use linux mint

>>107735080
>The terminal went away in the early 1990s on Windows and Mac
Both of those have terminals, you obese mangirl.

>>107736185
>>107736356
>>107736896
legitimately why is powershell so verbose? was it contracted to some outside company that got paid per character? or was it designed as verbose so microsoft enginsars could paid their kloc count?

>>107738352
>the kids who got bullied in school work at modern day microsoft (company that bill gate's named after his dick)
pottery

>>107744362

just look valueram valueselect those things just work

>>107744489
Performative male.

File: 1757467992463081.jpg (1.01 MB, 2000x1500)

1.01 MB JPG

>>107744362
>>107744489
ram go brrrrrr

>>107744583
Is that a fucking Skulltrail? Wew

>>107744595
fuck yeah it is