>>107592657
SAAR PLEASE NO POOO IN STREET. MUCH DISGUST OF SMELL. NO WHITE WOMAN SEXY TIME IF POOP BE CONTINUING. PLEASE MAKE USE LOO SAAAAAAAAAAAAR

>implying they use jails

> Don’t break the site or do anything that interferes with normal use of Reddit.
lol so they decided to DDoS the site or something and wonder why they’re banned

>>107592657
>where has moved
Surely you should be able to use a pretty lightweight browser based local model to translate your streettalk to english by now ranjesh.
Maybe you should get an AI to tell you how to do that next time

>>107592657
>Where has moved
the world would be a better place if you and everyone genetically related to you were disintegrated

>>107593131
no literally all it takes is for someone with money to ask reddit to ban something and they'll do it, no questions asked

File: 929183.png (63 KB, 280x280)

63 KB PNG

>>107583398
pufferfish wit da big ass lip

>>107592043
>Why the gap around 3/4 of your taskbar?
Literally what?
>Why is only one corner, the top right of your browser window, rounded?
I don't manage that, honestly the window behaved by itself
>You aren't using Terminus, you are using TerminessNFM, and it looks like shit everywhere.
Yes TerminusNFM to have glyphs in the terminal, whats bad about it

>>107592179
I can see the problem is your brain. Sorry to have bothered you.

>>107592200
You can kindly fuck off

File: screen.jpg (1.85 MB, 2560x1440)

1.85 MB JPG

I've distrohopped to artix to try dinit. I'm enjoying being able to just install gtk2 apps since I use the aurora gtk2 engine, which usually I use through qt5gtk2. Some software just feels less hacky in general. I have a weird issue where my X server keeps crashing randomly though.

>>107589493
Another reason why I think people often don't engage with my thoughts, is because they're usually quite fleshed-out and there's not much to add to the discussion, even if they're interested in the subject matter. Half the time I'm sure they're just put off by my ego.

>>107585922
Kek, the absolute autistic energy contained here. Pure kino.

>>107586540
Me too man why can't I have a weird but interesting hyperfixation

File: Thunderbolt Siren Graveya(...).jpg (236 KB, 1129x1051)

236 KB JPG

The Thunderbolt community is adorable

>>107588339
>muh particools
Can you show the study? inb4 it’s trace amounts. Mythbusters did their own test about shit and piss particles. Even when the toothbrush was out of the bathroom, in a kitchen, under a glass cover, it still had shit and piss particles on its bristles. Environment is fucking dirty, dwi.

File: DP-18556-030.jpg (2.95 MB, 3457x4000)

2.95 MB JPG

>>107590183
>photonic quantum computer

He looks like if Linus tech tips fused with Jimmy Fallon

imagine believing this bullshit

>>107590183
they have doom running on something, just not on whatever meme shit you're rambling on about

>>107590183
To maximize the framerate in software mode (the way the game was meant to look) the most recent official port breaks up the screen so that each portion is handled per CPU core. I wonder what would happen if that's done on this.

>>107592571
this, anti-ai trannies should have raised the alarm a long time ago when everyone was seemingly okay with having slop churned out everywhere all the time
if you think only now it's serious, you're part of the problem, you're the reason we're here faggot
for the record I hate ai-jeets considerably more

>>107592929
>>107589593
>>107590348
You shoudn't base your opinion on AI based on which groups are more likely to be for or against it, that's just culture war brainrot. There are spiteful nihilists on both sides.
I don't give a fuck about trannies on Bluesky losing art commissions, but I still dislike AI art for being soulless.

>>107589422
>drawcel
It was inkcel back in 2022, why do you keep changing the name?

>>107589422
How much will you be willing to spend to use it once they need to start actually making money on it?

>>107590001
in the same way that we are "stuck" with using most of the words that are in the dictionary, lmao retard.

>>107593034
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqyw9cjbkbg
This is magnificent

>>107579796
as someone used to high-level programming (Java), this is expectedly getting slightly easier with each level

>>107593102
Some of the last levels on the hardware tier are mostly just formalities.

>>107593034
RGMechEx
DouglasDwyer
AngeTheGreat
SheafificationOfG
Naviary
Mutual_Information
Radian628
Earthcomputer
MattKC

>>107593060
comfy

>>107592535
>now you're talking about two different things, stack protection and memory safety which are definitely not interchangeable terms
I write no_std Rust and have both.

>>107592454
I did not claim that. Someone else did.

>>107592724
Then stop attempting to hijack conversation if you are not willing to support the claims that were made. This reply chain started with that claim. If you disagree with that claim then say so instead.

>>107592335
Yes, it is a hostile takeover.
Yes, people say it is shit.
Yes, people leave the sinking ship.
Yes, people are allowed to complain about it.

So what exactly is your problem? You say that everybody should just keep their mouths shut when a project they liked is being hijacked and destroyed?

>>107593063
>So what exactly is your problem?
I don't have any problem. It is you who are complaining, not me.

>You say that everybody should just keep their mouths shut when a project they liked is being hijacked and destroyed?
No. I am saying that fortunately no one forces anyone in FOSS to work on projects they don't like. So grab your fellow maintainers, make a fork and leave these hostile trannies with nothing. You shouldn't stay silent. You should go right now right there to the Ubuntu mailing lists and get together with fellow maintainers to get the project back on tract, make it into what everyone wants, free from Rust and trannies.
They can't hear you here. You should go and talk wirh them directly.
No one wants hostile takeovers. You can make the change. This is FOSS, you are in control here.

>>107591940
That anon is clearly some larping jeet retard he claims his logs about botnet attacks show "prevalence" of windows XP yet he dont actually have anything he just larps
He clearly fundamentally doesnt understand what we are talking about here

>>107591992
Now even your language is degenerating towards becoming jeet babble :D

Why are you jeets always such larpers and you think like if you use the correct words then you are the professional or something, but none of the things you say ever make sense

Do you just do nothing at work when the jeet HR hired you through some H1B scam, I mean in a big company I guess you can just slip through cracks and you pretend to do things but never actually do? Then at the coffee room throw around few words like CVE and patterns and go back pretending to work?

>>107592161
>when I've checked I don't see anything running in task manager that shouldn't be there.
Implying you can trust a compromised machine to give you uncompromised data?

>Why would I be port forwarding to a system known to be exploitable?
It's not "ports" that are exploitable. It's the service on the other end listening to it.
22 is commonly used for SSH. Which is typically solid. However, as this is used to issue commands as if you're sat in front of the machine, it represents a juicy target. You don't actually need an SSH server running on 22 to be listening on it.

>that and the mere act of connecting these systems to a network is hazardous.
Essentially. Yes.
There's gangs of roaming softwares seeking it for low hanging fruit. It's the era of tailored exploits where you're fingerprinted and payloads delivered by services. Almost all software spec'd for it isn't safe to allow online...

>>107592227
>Yeah, text or screenshots are both fine, show what the prevalence of WinXP machines in botnets looks like
I can *easily* show the prevailence of botnets...

Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>107592278
>He clearly fundamentally doesnt understand what we are talking about here
Yeah. Being a dipshit. It's what happens everytime you open your mouth, or put finger to keyboard.
Kinda why you should stay in /pol.

>degenerating towards becoming jeet babble
To the undereducated.
Go back to /pol.

>if you use the correct words
>none of the things you say ever make sense
One of those conditions can be true. Not both.
Pick one.
Then because the other is yours you can fuck off back to /pol with the rest of the inbred impotent mongaloids crying about how the jeets took their jerbs.


Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>107590694
https://cachyos.org/download/

>>107590694
even palemoon explicitly does not support winxp. why do you insist on using this deprecated os?
https://www.palemoon.org/systemrequirements.shtml

>>107590664
You can download it for free (non-commercial use only)

>>107592539
it don't. but it's virtually abandoned. and surprisingly codelite isn't

>i only have 4gb of ram
How?

>>107591284
>Not necessarily expecting to deep dive and fully even grasp C++
at least you're keeping your expectations reasonable
>Life is too long to know C++ well. – Erik Naggum
>I may be biased, but I tend to find a much lower tendency among female programmers to be dishonest about their skills, and thus do not say they know C++ when they are smart enough to realize that that would be a lie for all but perhaps 5 people on this planet. – Erik Naggum

>>107590595
>>107590595
>Full of non standard C++ extensions that now compete with actual C++ features like lambdas.
What part of Qt competes with lambdas? In my experience everything in Qt works really well with lambdas.
There are other areas where the framework doesn't play as nicely with modern C++ concepts (like move semantics) but overall it works fine.

https://desuarchive.org/g/thread/107579692/#107581081

>>107579692
"i didn't get hired" envy.

>>107580134
>if you could design a better one
Better ones already exist there is no need to make new ones, 4chan is just too big to fail so they don't care

>>107588567
>obsessed commiepedotroons
What are you babbling on about

>>107580134
pedo proxy has a better one
Chance has a better one
sharty won

>>107593227
>Why haven't you switched yet?
Genuinely because this is the only GUI git client I've used since I usually just use git itself. It gets the job done when I want a UI but I was wondering if there's others worth looking at.

it's a logistics company they don't care about tech or product

>>107593219
It's a logistics company that relies on in house built tech

>>107578308
netbsd user here :)

>>107590053
and you're technically correct, but relicensing the original code is still not legally enforceable
if you take two files from a BSD licensed project and only modify one of them and say "this is now GPL," and someone pulls code from the unmodified file (or any unmodified lines from the changed file) you can say "ooooh, you have to release your changes because this is under GPL now," you can't actually enforce this in court, because all the downstream dev has to do is say "nope, this code is copyright the original developer and is still under the BSD license"
you can license any changes you make under a copyleft license, but you cannot relicense the original code; neither copyright law nor the BSD license permits that, you can only GPL license code to which (You) own the copyright

>>107592710
Right, and none of this was ever my argument, or the argument of the other Anon who was talking about talking a BSD project and slapping GPL on it. You're essentially arguing with yourself here, beating down a straw man that you have built for yourself.

>>107592828
>talking a BSD project and slapping GPL on it
and you still can't do that
it's meaningless and unenforceable
you can only license YOUR CHANGES under GPL
you cannot "slap GPL" on BSD licensed code to which you do not own the copyright

>>107592883
>talking a BSD project and slapping GPL on it
>it's meaningless and unenforceable
So long as the codebases remain identical or so long as you can't prove that the project contained GPL code that was distributed without source. But this was established already in >>107589905 so I don't know why you're still acting like I'm arguing against it. I'm not arguing about what's "meaningfully enforceable", I'm arguing about what's technically (il)legal. There could be even one line of GPL code in a project with thousands of lines of BSD code and if the binary for that project is ever distributed, the source code would still, *technically and legally*, have to be released. So, for the sake of argument, let's go with that.

>you can only license YOUR CHANGES under GPL
>you cannot "slap GPL" on BSD licensed code to which you do not own the copyright
When you create your project, you licence the entire project as a whole. You cannot say "this code only has 1 line of GPL, so I'll only release that one line, but not the 1000 other lines that were originally under BSD because BSD says I don't have to". No. If a project contains GPL, the entire codebase has to comply with the GPL. You cannot claim copyright over the original BSD code and you cannot remove the original BSD licence and copyright notice - that would violate the few terms that the BSD (2 or 3 clause) licence has - but you *can* very much take BSD licenced code and slap GPL code onto it *OR* slap code onto it that you never intend to release as source. You do not need explicit permission from the original copyright owner to do either of those things, or for the original copyright holder to relicence the code for you so you could use it in a GPL project. Literally the entire point.

>>107582769
I have a job I hate as a printer technician because there aren't jobs in IT you can get without nepotism anymore, do I count as a tech worker or should I be in the unemployed tech workers thread?

>>107593125
I guess you can technically browse this thread. But there is a requirement to post loli and/or complain about non-whites (Russians and spics aren't white btw) from time to time.

>>107593125
Dedicated printers tech?
How did that happen?
yes its IT related.

Four more weeks and I put in my notice
Fuck this job

>get code review request
>point out bugs
>they "fix" them badly and break other things
>point out the new bugs
>they also "fix" these ones badly and break other things
>get tired and just let them merge it
humiliation ritual

File: 1736733541077150.png (1.28 MB, 720x1440)

1.28 MB PNG

Can someone pls tell me if theres a way to remove the margins in the gallery, and also how to scroll it vertically instead of scrolling horizontally.
I miss Kuroba so much man, gallery had no margins and could scroll vertically which just looks better and feels way more natural.
Ive pretty much gotten used to everything else thats ugly about chance, but this one gripe i have with the gallery is really making me furious

File: 1755385762076753.png (1.01 MB, 720x1520)

1.01 MB PNG

>>107592660
See how kuroba does it, looks so much cleaner and organized. Chances gallery looks so clunky and chaotic

>>107592262
I'm actually busy but just came here to thank Goyrilla (the dev who likes gorillas) for the quote selected text feature!

Just that makes it miles ahead of KurobaEx. Whether KX hade this idk it wasn't easily accessible and I always stood between no quotes or quote all...

>>107586764
I would rather continue to use Blue's webview and manually tag all of my own posts than use the literal itoddler humiliation ritual that is chance

File: 1764606093802830.png (118 KB, 720x695)

118 KB PNG

>>107592970
Kurobas always had this, see picrel
Literally just select the text you want and the option to quote is right there. Idk how you missed this