through technology?
>>100158982https://youtu.be/kbcoOqGKFi8
https://youtu.be/Oo_FM3mjBCY
Chat is this true?
I guess not.
>>100159036
>>100160268?Bane?
>>100158978>Is /g/ concerned with the loss of human freedomNo, I post those signs everywhere and have cameras everywhere. Trying to find a plugin for Zoneminder that identifies race, gender, creed.
>>100163279Funny. >ZoneminderThanks for that it looks like a cool piece of software, also protecting your property is your right.
>>100158978They only seem concerned with being allowed to say the n word and watch child porn. They would happily lick technofascist boots every single day if it meant their perceived enemies (literal normal people) were the ones being hunted. They don't care for the actual victims of our current geopolitical system.
>>100164306Looks like you've already had conversations trying to convince people of the ever increasing technocratic tyranny to no avail. I would really hope there's no actual criminals who frequent /g/, if anything I'd hope they're the minority instead of the majority of users.
>>100158978With local AI I have more freedom than ever.
>>100165007When did freedom become "What can happen on a screen"? You're using your freedom to support technology that is already having disastrous consequences for the human race and things are just getting started. People have invited AI into healthcare, the justice system, surveillance, recently the military and more. Whatever freedom and power you think you have in your room, the proverbial Boot has orders of magnitude more freedom and power to stomp on your head. Lets be real for a second. CBDC and Digital ID alone, no AI necessary, is enough for a full-scale, Biblical technocratic dystopia to flourish. Inject AI into that and who knows what will happen.The problem is immoral people obeying and propping up immoral governments, which after the covid scamdemic, should give anyone with two braincells an idea as to which government is "moral".
>>100165223nigger like turn off the computer, nigger like leave your house, nigger like go to the parknigger like don't take your cell phone
>>100158978Yes, technofetishists belong in ovens
>>100165230great Tyler the Creator impersonation, now gtfo
>>100158978the loss of freedom will be at the hand of convenience just as it has happened with phones and the progress of AD-driven internet, the progress of AI will force governments to either set laws and regulations or, the sadly most probable case, force more and more sites to use KYC-like systems, imagine having to show your ID to use leddit or twitter, yeah. like that.
>>100164306Normal people say nigger, or at least the smart ones do. Being in a cult (ie worshipping black people) isn't normal. >>100164389Unfortunately pedophiles are a vocal minority on here. I think a lot of them are government employees given how some of them type. I hope they all die painfully.
>>100165264Start bootstrapping (using that word makes me feel like a faggot but whatever) local, distributed social networks then. And I don't just mean mastodon, federated discord would be infinitely more useful.
>>100165247oh no you're addicted to your technology :'(
>>100158978Not technology. Economy.
>>100163279Wait, can you add deep learning plugins to zoneminder? I would love to train a human behaviour recognition model to identify "jogging" behaviours around my property. A color-based classifier would be a pain in the ass, because of different lighting conditions.
>>100165291Stop pretending to be retarded. You cannot get a job without technology unless you happen to have someone who can nepo-hire you. >LOL UM JUST STARVE THEN?You're not clever, what you're doing is obvious. Kill yourself immediately.
>>100165336start by not posting on 4chan and go outside nigger
>>100165266>You either want to kill black people like us or you worship themI dunno man they're just people
>go outside lol touch grassGoing outside is not gonna stop the technology's ceaseless marching, and it's certainly not gonna make you not sprayed with nanotech from shedding and chemtrails.I wonder why /g/ never talks about this. Is it not "technology"?https://gregreese.substack.com/p/nanobots-that-release-toxins-and
bump
>>100159036What the fuck, out of all of them Zucc seems the most... human.Fucking how
>>100158982>>100158995I wouldn't be half as mad about kikes if they let me play with the military tech toys they create with my tax money instead of wasting them killing mudslimes
>>100159036Whos the one that only has a nametag
>>100168135>military tech toys' only use is for playingThat's a world I'd like to live in.
>>100165223>When did freedom become "What can happen on a screen"?Ever since they took it away from me
>>100165264>the progress of AI will force governments to either set laws and regulations or, the sadly most probable case, force more and more sites to use KYC-like systemsI don't know about you, but I'm gonna drop this internet altogether then, if possible.I'll see you in another protocol. You will be welcomed there.
https://gregreese.substack.com/p/artificial-intelligence-and-the-grim>...>But I would say the part I agree with is there's a spiritual component here for sure. People will worship A.I. as a god. A.I., Ted Kaczynski was likely right, will get away from us. We will be controlled by the thing that we made. All those are bad. Like, that's just bad. And we need to say unequivocally, it's bad. It's bad to be controlled by machines, right? Machines are our help mates. Like, we created them to help us to make our lives better, not to take orders from them.>So, I don't know why we're not having any of these conversations right now. We're just acting as if this is like, some kind of virus, like COVID, that spreads across the world inexorably, there's nothing we can do about it, just wait to get it. It's like, no! If we agree that the outcome is bad, and specifically it's bad for people. We should care what's good for people, that's all we should care about. Is it good for people or not. If it's bad for people, then we should strangle it in its crib right now, right? And why not just blow up the data centers. Like, why is that hard? If it's actually going to become what you just described, which is a threat to people, humanity, life, then we have a moral obligation to murder it immediately. And since it's not alive, we don't need to feel bad about that.”~ Tucker Carlson>“Well, you could say the same about the atomic bomb, right?”~ Joe Rogan>“Yes, you could. Everybody I've ever talked to, and there is many people, are like, yeah, it could get away from us and enslave us. Let's say no to slavery. How's that? Is that a tough one? Not for me. Yeah, I mean, and maybe a good use of nuclear weapons would be to hit the data centers. No. I'm serious. Like, why is that crazy?”~ Tucker Carlson
I am so scared of the botnet that I am considering ending my life or running away into the woods. In my university, normalfags won't stop taking random fucking pictures when I hang out with them without my goddamned permission. They are like vultures and just take pictures of fucking everything. I don't want to be in your god damned picture. Then, if you refuse, then you're the weird one. I don't want my fucking pictures on the internet, how hard is it for you to underfuckingstand? I hate discord. I hate all of these gay apps. "Touch Grass" is a meme. I hate social media. No, I don't have Instagram or a Tiktok. I don't even know what half the shit they talk about is, and I don't want to know.
>>100168882>If it's going to become a threat to humanity, then we have a moral obligation to murder it immediately.Why didn't I think of that..
>>100168884Weird how technology just naturally seems to violate your right to privacy doesn't it?
>>100158978I wouldn't say I'm concerned about it, I am, but I'm just not one of those times who thinks "activism" will do anything about it. Technology is inherently centralizing because as it gets more advanced and expensive, it requires more and more powerful organizations to purchase and operate it, let alone develop it. A good example is military equipment. There's like 3 countries, and the EU, that can make all the equipment to equip an army. Everyone else might be able to build some of it, but a lot of their military equipment is bought from the US, Russia, the EU and China. We're at a point where most nations can't even maintain a military without being dependent on a foreign power. Also, not really related, but watch the documentary "hypernormalization" >>100159226it's possible, but there has to be a vulnerability in the image viewer. It's not easy to pull off at all.
>>100165334>nigger breaks into your house>caught by the police thanks to camera footage>find out about the plugin>nigger goes free and you go to jail for violating his civil rights by having a surveillance system that looks for blacks
>>100165447>>>/x/>>100168884get better friends who respect your boundaries out of respect for you as a person regardless of whether they understand or reciprocate the boundaries
