>>101091437all my backups are on bluray, all my random files are on cdthey will never failfuck ssd and hdd botnet firmware
>>101091450and now the video made me interested, link good cd music players i can buy right now used
>>101091437That's because most people don't know that refrigerating SSDs causes their data retention to extend into decades. The dog ass slow random read/write speed speed of optical makes it a joke for backups.
>>101091437>*gets scratched*
>>101091437>zoomer sees a cd player for the first timewholesomemy futuristic robot design has a cd player as its brain.
>>101091533implying you need fast write speeds for optical discsthey are read only anyway. it's not like you are going to be deleting data from a disc and replacing it with other data>read speedyou just transfer the data from the disc to the hdd. problem solved
>>101091573you just copy the data*
>>101091468any sony walkman in good condition
>>101091573I specifically said RANDOM read/write speed. Unless you spin plastic at 30,000 RPM the random read/write speed is going to be outrageously dogshit.I'm not going to zip up everything into giant archives. I already hate doing that humiliation ritual with wifi transfers already.
>>101091437>optical discs are the only reli->rots in your way
the read/write speed is not that bad. it's about as good as my internet lmao
>>101091715EVEN IF you spent tears/blood into long AV1 encodes you would still wind up with with a few GBs for every 1080p movie.>200 MB/minuteLMAO fuck that, I have things to do.
>>101091654i would take the risk of my discs rotting over using a hdd (where my data doesn't even last because external hdds always have problems).here's a dvd-r that i burned in 2011. still works
>>101091763what large files are you archiving that you can't wait a few minutes?
people who download 50GB films are retardeda waste of hdd space
>>101091780We don't ALL watch DVD anime on a CRT. Some of us have 4K TVs.
>>101091437in my experience they're the least reliable. I rip everything into my SSDs the first chance I get
>>101091437cumming inside her bellybutton
>>101091601nice, had walkman back in the daylots somewhere nowwas considering getting mp3 player recently but cd player looks better
>>101091437I'm gonna teach that chink about all the Western advances in sexo technology
actually i prefer the read speed of a optical disc to the download speed of libgen(which is super fucking slow)if you store a bunch of ebooks on cd-rs you will never have to use libgen ever again
She's putting it on for TV. i guarantee the vast majority of those born in 2007 will know what discs are lol
>>101091564>my futuristic robot design has a cd player as its brain.>Turns the optical media back and fourth like a DJ with a turn table >F-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-fuck niggers *vinyl scratch*
>>101091920dvds maybepeople stopped using cds after ipods came out
>>101091967i assure you there are no kids who know don't about know about CD's, bar perhaps the youngest of kids (under 10, maybe)
>>101091993they probably have a vague sense of what they areThere are definitely a lot of kids who have never seen a cd player
>>101092007I suppose I don't doubt that, but don't most cars still have CD players/radios?
CDeez Nuts, nigga!
https://youtu.be/DCw0oiUa2SU?t=107
>>101091437true
>what is rotational velocidensity
>>101092015pretty much every car after 2014 started building in proper (proprietary) head units with bluetooth, even if it was their own gay unusable OS
>>101091437I fucking hate you so much
>>101091654Supposedly it's only certain batches of optical discs that were known to rot
>>101091437The amount of discs I would need for just my music collection would fill a storage unit.
>>101092376you could probably store over a 1000 albums on a single bluray if you store the music files as mp3s
>>101091941no you see its basically a cd burner rather than a player. it spins so fast if you touch it with your finger it incinerates off. the drive is constantly reading and writing almost like a hard drive but the disc is replaceable with new media or existing media like swapping brains.
back in the day i would burn 12-14 albums to a cd-r burning them as mp3s made that possiblemy car stereo could play mp3s from a disc
>>101091437>>101091715
>>101092467here's the read speed of my usb bluray player
>>101091437>optical>reliableMy LDs are starting to go, some movies look like they got rice stuck on the film. My 2000s CD-Rs are toast, and the oldest of my 80s CDs are starting to go. I love them, but anything that isn't magnetic is a meme for long-term backup. I pulled a 30 year old floppy out of a junk pile recently and it still read great. My tapes are all great, at least the ones I stored properly. My 90s hard drives have all their data, they do make scary noises and I don't know how much longer I'll have them thoughbeit.
indisputable truth |v
LTO tapes are the closest you'll get to reliable archival storage.
>>101091437Crazy that cold storage is still an issue
>>101093036those are magnetic, aka not reliable
>>101091437>born in 2007>shes 17.... AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
>>101093036Looking at the overall cost I would just opt for mdisk medium and keep it in some air tight fire resistant storage box.
>>101091437*rots**gets scratched*kys linuxpedo
>>101091437cute tummy. would love to see it stretched out by bbc
>>1010922152015 reporting in, came with CD as standard equipment.
>>101093656>*rots*That's what you get for storing your Dollar Tree CD-R's in your unconditioned attic.>*gets scratched*User error.
>>101093036See >>101091533It's such a shame this is a bullshit tech SEKRIT. It's something so simple. Not rocket science, ya know?
>>101093695She's 16 you sick fuck
>>101095335out of 10
Woman is only good to give head
>>101091437Why is it only high IQ azn qt's that appreciate us inventors/engineers/scientists?
>>101091437oh look. this thread again!correct me if I'm wrong but 4chan just feels like a tiny rolodex of repetitive pre-cooked posts designed to be confrontational mixed with some companies relentlessly running marketing campaigns. am I missing something? how is this better than reddit again?
>>101091533>>101093779Didn't know that, so for long term storage you just chuck your SSDs into the refrigerator?
>>101091644i would rather have slow write/read speeds than have my data completely gone due to a hdd failureread speed of cd-rs is not a problem with small files such as ebooks. they are ideal for storing small files
>>101091437why are zoomers like this
>>101093695>would love to see it stretched out by bbc>bbckys amerishart mutttotal nigger death
>>101091533>pull it out>condensation kills it within minutesLOL
*blocks your path*
>>101092215>even if it was their own gay unusable OSIt's almost always QNX with some godawful hacked together java GUI written entirely by third world contractors.
>>101091715>>101091765what distro, DE, WM, theme, and font? looks good.
>>101098086i think these are unnecessary i used the cheapest blurays i could find and after 5 years there is no sign of wear and tear on them
>>101091437
>>1010981015 years is nothing for optical media, M disks are for 100 years +, if the data is really that important to you its worth the premium (if it works)
>>101098116why would i want my optical discs to outlive me? i just my discs to last until my deathi don't care what happens to them after my death
>>101098128i just want my disc to last until my death*
>>101091437I cant comprehend that people like her exist.
>>101091533Backup... If you need to access your backup all the time you are doing something wrong...
>>101097881yup>>101098085Vacuum seal it or just wait a few hours for any water to evap. There's also waterproof SATA/NVME enclosures.
>>101091437that's cute.but i don't think optical media is the only reliable storage media
>>101092395That's true. I was thinking of just regular CD's.
any tips for incremental backups on optical media? I mean, let's say I start with some initial amount of data and want to do backups once every month. It would be terribly inefficient to always backup the same data + the new data every time. After a year, I'd have 12 copies of the same stuff. Sure, redundancy is nice but not like this. So instead, some solution is needed to keep track of what files have already been backed up, and only backup the deltas of any changed files, plus new files in whole. Then, there would need to be some catalogue to facilitate easier access to the data. Let's say you want to reconstruct a specific file. The catalogue should point you towards the physical discs that contain the file and any further revisions. Does an all in one software suite exist for something like this?
>>101097661>correct me if I'm wrong but 4chan just feels like a tiny rolodex of repetitive pre-cooked posts designed to be confrontational>mixed with some companies relentlessly running marketing campaigns.it's part of the same thing. it's called guerrilla marketing.retards in this board think these companies wouldn't target them because this is their spechul snowflake sekrit club, but it obviously happens, and has happened ever since this whole website was brainwashed by stormfront.
>>101095335legal in my country. But the age of consent in south Korea is 20 so it would be illegal even if she was 18.
>>101100716DVD-RAM
>>101091564found your design
>>101091437I would show ChaeWon so many things if i could
>>101100927That explains so much.
>>101097661damn I should buy a Rolodex®
>>101091437I want to have sex with her if you know what I mean
>2-decade-old CD-R>Stationary in a dark place for 99.99% of its existence>Files fail to copyIf you rely on optical media for long-term storage, have redundancies.Not trying to get into a gay internet argument, just trying to save Anons headaches way down the road
>>101102581Old CDRs not lasting is pretty common knowledge. What I do wonder though is that if DVDs and BRs have the same problem.
>>101102559I don't get it
