why?
>>101222696Those systems cost several thousand of dollars because they are intended for developers only. There is no active ARM ecosystem for the mainstream consumer segment so it makes no sense for ARM vendors to invest there. Especially considering that the bulk of applications are designed to run on x86 chips.Microsoft tried with the Snapdragon 8cx in their Surface laptop which used Windows 10 for ARM but this has so far been failure and few OEMs bothered using ARM chips. Apple will try next year with their ARM-powered Macbook Air so they could enjoy some success.
>>101222672>>101222711Dear person(s) behind this chatbot:Please update your training data.Sincerely,Your validation data farm.
>>101223038Sorry, i can't generate a response based on your prompt.
>>101222711surface? more like Microsoft Bottom
>>101222711>they are intended for developers only. There is no active ARM ecosystem for the mainstream consumer segment
>>101222672is that why everyone has a smartphone now?
>>101222672it already doesDarwin mbp14pro.local 23.5.0 Darwin Kernel Version 23.5.0: Wed May 1 20:14:38 PDT 2024; root:xnu-10063.121.3~5/RELEASE_ARM64_T6020 arm64
Darwin mbp14pro.local 23.5.0 Darwin Kernel Version 23.5.0: Wed May 1 20:14:38 PDT 2024; root:xnu-10063.121.3~5/RELEASE_ARM64_T6020 arm64
>>101222711How come Apple was able to get literally every company that matters to compile their shit for Apple Silicon while Microsoft, which has a bigger market share, can't do it?Seriously the only stuff you don't have on Apple Silicon is gayming, which doesn't matter.
>>101225966they don't have a pajeet at the helm and have a better financial dev support scheme.they dropped the billions and shit got done.