gem

ded

>>101436964
Didn't this die after like a month?

>>101436964
worse python

Syntax kinda comfy

Packagement between platforms yikes

Slow

Python tier

>>101438062

isnt ruby 3.3 okay in terms of speed? i believe its faster than python

>minor version update
>breaking changes in basic, core API like string methods
never again
>unless

crystal is the superior choice

>>101438200
>>breaking changes in basic, core API like string methods
>never again
example?

>>101438124
languages can't get fast once they become slow

>>101438768

elaborate on this?

>>101438725
https://docs.ruby-lang.org/en/master/NEWS/NEWS-1_9_1.html#label-Compatibility+issues
it was a long time ago, tbf they have probably gotten better since then

>>101436964
comfy
i use it all the time for various little scripts

>>101438863

this is ruby 1.9.1..

ruby is on 3.3 =]

I don't make RPG Maker games so I don't really see why I should care about it.

>>101438124
python will always be faster for dealing with a lot of numbers and data. ruby has jit in mri now, and other implementations can get really fast but it depends on what you're doing. it excels at all the shit people used to do in perl and php.
>>101438768
php got a lot faster after everyone started ditching it. i guess its a similar story with ruby.
>>101438200
other languages have had worse breakages. I've had more annoyance with crystal breaking as it stabilized. Crystal is pretty good for sure, as a mid-point between the ease of Ruby and going to something more serious with more development cost. useful typing just aint really gonna happen in ruby. The Crystal standard library is better than Rubys now too

Ruby sparks joy.

>>101436964
Pythonfag here, should I learn Ruby if I want to make a personal website? Is it that much better for that use case?