>see v2024.02>instantly more info that v1.2It clicked anon, i now see date based version numbers are superior
>>101439394it's not, what if the number of changes between v2024.02 and v2024.01 is basically nothing while v2024.03 is a complete rewrite of major functionality? This only works for shit like distros or software suites that are just a collection of different packages
>>101439421fpbponly makes sense for security critical applications with large attack surface where you dont want to be using something like an OS without any patches for the last 2 yearsfor 99.99% things, dates are a meme
>>101439394Git sha hashes only. All version numbers are arbitrary
>>101439465The simplicity is beautiful but it offers no real information unless you refer to the git. That's something you can technically do with all of them.
