Why are things getting so goofy the more technology "progresses"?
Someone thought it'd be a good idea to let women make decisions.
>>101534762wth that's problematic you chud
yeah this is what we need
>>101534729Why do you confuse technology with business?
>your face when ______________?
>>101534729Technological progress does not compensate for cultural and anthropological decay.
>>101534729If they add spatial audio, audio reconstruction and auto volume leveling it'd beat the shit out of any conference solution today where you can't hear shit if more than one person is talking at a time.
>iMmErSiVe aNd DyNaMiC rEsEaRcH pRoToTyPeYou could do the same exact fucking thing almost 30 years ago.The fuck are they doing?
>>101534729No technological solutions to the problems caused by technology.
The more things change, the more they stay the same.https://youtu.be/8uVmTBPIDpM?si=eKofJ2-hZfh2agLO&t=275
>>101534729Absurdity keeps you compliant and malleable. Stay fearful and keep consuming.
>>101534993bro it uses AI to put your face on a cartoon character, are you stupid or something? MACHINE LEARNING AI AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
>>101534838The adrenochrome kicks in
>>101534729this has been in both teams and zoom for years
>>101534729Autistic people solving problems that nobody asked
why does it look like those funny staring cats?
>>101534729The same reason early 3D games look like shit compared to 2D games released at the same time.
>>101535102SOVLtechnological "progress" should have stopped in the early 2010s
>bad green screen compositingNow with flashy "AI" marketing!
>>101535704Yeah but now you don't need a green screen.
>>101535590because it's from their webcams which are fairly close to their faces, and they're also lined up next to each other. each of them a separate close-up shot but put in this scene and viewed as if from a single pov much further away. it makes the perspective nonsensical and look really weird.
>>101535149that'll be 500m VC plus tip.
>>101534993Eyetoy for the PS2 was the peak of technology, everything after that has been superfluous
>>101534729Unironically because the people in charge of things have no vision for the future and exist purely to put more money into the pockets of shareholders. Our economic systems no longer allow for true innovation, because true innovation is risky and shareholders don't like that.
>>101535761is there no model to correct distance to camera distortion?
>>101534729why would i want that?
>>101535808>Our economic systems no longer allow for true innovation, because true innovation is risky and shareholders don't like that.so much thisthis is the reason why Atari and Commodore have vanished, because true visionaries were fired and they were replaced by shareholder-made managers who didn't know shit about technology and were afraid to innovate cause innovation is too risky for da shareholderzapple almost went bankrupt because of that too but they managed to get Steve Jobs back just in time as he was a true innovator and a visionary no matter what we think about apple here
>>101534729its not about progress nor tech its about scamming as much investor money as you can as quickly as possible so you will see people throw shit at the wall until the sticks.
>>101534729What the heck is this, Angela Anaconda in color?
>>101534729lmao
>>101538184Huh, so those cartoons were real and not just a childhood fever dream.
>>101534762Eventually this will get talked about more, they are totally incapable of leadership and yet are almost exclusively forced into middle management positions in these organizations.>>101535808On top of that, I would add that any individual or small organization attempting to innovate is instantly crushed either through lawfare or acquisition. These mega-trust corporations have more power than many nations.>>101536756And ultimately decades of rewarding this behavior. Picrel. Why are they getting billions to put out crap like this when some nobody is working hard to put out a finished, (hopefully) big-free SaaS on day one? How much of this shit is money laundering?
>>101535761Is this why I look so ugly on my phone camera but handsome in the mirror?
>>101538437Eh, only part of that. The main reason is that you're simply used to seeing your own ugly face in an specific angle.
>>101534993>The fuck are they doing?Some idiot investors fat pockets
>>101534729Because maximum technology = pure magic. And magic = goofy. In a technological utopia people are having FUN!!!!!!!! Why wouldn't they?And the NDE world is infinitely advanced and hence "magical" as NDErs say that the tech there makes ours into a joke. And NDEs are real as NDEs are seriously irrefutable proof that heaven really is awaiting us all because (1) people see things during their NDEs when they are out of their bodies that they should not be able to under the assumption that the brain creates consciousness, and (2) anyone can have an NDE and everyone is convinced by it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U00ibBGZp7oSo every atheist or materialist or agnostic would be too if they had an NDE, so pic related is literally irrefutable proof of life after death. As one NDEr pointed out:>"The minute that I kind of woke up on that hillside in heaven I knew that that was more real than any time I've ever spent here on Earth. And I knew instantly that my time here was really but a dream. It's real to us when we're in it, but once I was there in heaven I realized that's more real, that felt more real, and it made much more sense to me than anything here. This is kind of nonsensical at times. In heaven, it's so clear, so real, so rational, so logical, but yet emotional and loving at the same time. Immediately I knew that was real and this was not. Immediately."If NDEs were hallucinations then extreme atheists and neuroscientists who had NDEs would agree that they were halluinations after having them. But the opposite happens as NDEs convince every skeptic when they have a really deep NDE themselves.The problem, however, is that so many pseudoskeptics never actually read the scholarly literature on NDEs and instead just assume, based on their materialist dogma, that since there can not be any evidence for the reality of NDEs, there is no point actually learning more about NDEs.
>>101534866Why would you wanna encourage more than one person to talk at the same time at a meeting?
>>101540669Is this something you try to shoehorn everywhere or?
>>101541030he herped so much that he derped
>>101534729
>>101542439kek
I hold company meetings in the Lethal Company shipbefore we end the call, we go to Embrion and see who lasts the longest with the robots
