>mfw my 127 lines of C++ are 24 % faster than his one line of C#
>>101559463Can you provide an example of this phenomenon?
>>101559463based>>101559688cringe
>>101559463A 24% runtime improvement used to be astronomical. Now we have webjeets mashing meme frameworks together so a tranny can blogpost about how rewriting it in rust unironically makes it 400 times faster.
>>10155946324% is big if in hot code (often called in normal runtime)
>>101559688his neet fizzbuzz test
>>101559688he is probably doing some linq one liner. 1 vs 127 lol
>>101559463>linesLittle nigger, learn how computers work
>>101563329sewerslvt posted!!
>>101562872What I hate about modern pajeet code is 1GB RAM usage for a fucking calculator or someshit.
>>101559463If everyone goes for the 24% speed up wherever we can, we end up with super fast and efficient tech
>>1015594631 line can be a call to a 10k line function thougheverbeit so that's a retarded thing to say
>>101563532What's really retarded is to think one spends the same time writing one line of code and one hundred twenty-seven lines of code.
>>101559463WPF implented mostly in C# runs circles around WinUI in C++. Language hardly matters for performance.Though your single line probably has an exploitable bug.
>>101559463>>101559463>switch to .net 7 or above >enable AOT compilation>my 1 line of C# code now on par with your 127+ lines of C++ codeHeh... nothing personal kid
