Dead internet theory…
>>101564543>are those....twitter bots??>NEEEEOOOOOOOOOOO WAKE UP YOU'RE LITERALLY IN THE MATRIXXXXXX
>>101564543it's ok anon i'm here and i'm real
>>101564543>be me>post art once in a blue moon>24k views 1.5k likes averageFeels good man
>>101564751how?I post 3d goywork once or twice a month too and I barely cross 20 views and 0 likes
>>101565023I was on the same boat for about 2 years
>>101564543Twitter view metrics can not be trusted, especially because they really do have a severe bot problem. But bots on social media are not representative of a "dead internet."
>>101565023he probably doesnt post furry amputee porn
>>101564543nonsense
>>101566854I make shit like this anon, despite spending hours in this shit I barely got 4 likes on insta and 2 likes on twitter I fucking hate this internet
>>101568656consider making porn.
social media is about quantity. it's consumed by roasties. and roasties only care about sex and migrants for virtue signaling.
>>101568656shockingly enough, there isnt really an audience for "abstract ambient shot of generic male mannequin walking into the light (with a vintage muscle car to his right)you might consider doing something unique, yknow, what no one's doing? Where there isnt literally millions of indians in the world right now doing and posting exactly what you are?
>>101564751>>101565023Ever since muskrat took over the algo has been very predictableThe formula is very much laid out nowadays, I don't understand how some artists complain about no engagement. I'm getting 4k on just sketches
>>101568656lmao you spent hours pasting some free unity assets just to make something that looks like generic AI slopit would be sad if it weren't so funny
>>101564543You're a retard that doesn't understand that merely following someone won't magically make their posts show up. Even if you change the timeline to My Following, you would need to be scrolling at the time it was posted.
>>101569128Good point.
>>101564543i've noticed this as well, a lot of these accounts and posts you'd expect to have far more traction have next to nonei know twitter users, particularly avid ones are a tiny proportion of the population, but it's somewhat true on places like youtuube as well
>>101568656Caravaggio would spend years on his "shit"
>>101568656The hubris of 3D posing artists.
>>101569285These are likely just washed up pundits from the 2010's who bought deprecated bots a long time ago. They're irrelevant. That's why the blue check stuff was so hurting to these people. I found it very surprising when the blue check measures became the clear priority for washed up libtards opposing Musk, but I get it now.
>>101568656Do you consume art that looks like that? If so, how many views/likes do those artists get?The issue with your art is that it's emotionless. What am I supposed to feel looking at this?Imagine if it was in any other medium (i.e. oil painting), would you expect to get much attention? The one visually appealing aspect of this piece is the reflections.If you look at any great art, it tells a story. From a mere looking into the eyes of a portrait, you're able to infer a great amount about a man. What am I to infer from your piece?
>>101568656>posts ai slop>wonders why no one likes it
>>101564543>post garbage>surprised no one pays attention
>>101569602You don't consume art you enjoy it
