Discussion of free and open source text-to-image modelsPrevious /ldg/ bread : >>101729379>Beginner UIEasyDiffusion: https://easydiffusion.github.ioFooocus: https://github.com/lllyasviel/fooocusMetastable: https://metastable.studio>Advanced UIAutomatic1111: https://github.com/automatic1111/stable-diffusion-webuiComfyUI: https://github.com/comfyanonymous/ComfyUIInvokeAI: https://github.com/invoke-ai/InvokeAISD.Next: https://github.com/vladmandic/automaticSwarmUI: https://github.com/mcmonkeyprojects/SwarmUI >Use a VAE if your images look washed outhttps://rentry.org/sdvae>Model Rankinghttps://imgsys.org/rankings>Models, LoRAs & traininghttps://civitai.comhttps://huggingface.cohttps://aitracker.arthttps://github.com/Nerogar/OneTrainerhttps://github.com/derrian-distro/LoRA_Easy_Training_Scripts>Fluxhttps://huggingface.co/spaces/black-forest-labs/FLUX.1-schnellhttps://comfyanonymous.github.io/ComfyUI_examples/flux>Pixart Sigma & Hunyuan DIThttps://huggingface.co/spaces/PixArt-alpha/PixArt-Sigmahttps://huggingface.co/spaces/Tencent-Hunyuan/HunyuanDiThttps://huggingface.co/comfyanonymous/hunyuan_dit_comfyuiNodes: https://github.com/city96/ComfyUI_ExtraModels>Kolorshttps://gokaygokay-kolors.hf.spaceNodes: https://github.com/kijai/ComfyUI-KwaiKolorsWrapper>AuraFlowhttps://fal.ai/models/fal-ai/aura-flowhttps://huggingface.co/fal/AuraFlows>Index of guides and other toolshttps://rentry.org/sdg-linkhttps://rentry.org/rentrysd>GPU performancehttps://vladmandic.github.io/sd-extension-system-info/pages/benchmark.htmlhttps://docs.getgrist.com/3mjouqRSdkBY/sdperformance>Try online without registrationtxt2img: https://www.mage.spaceimg2img: https://huggingface.co/spaces/huggingface/diffuse-the-restsd3: https://huggingface.co/spaces/stabilityai/stable-diffusion-3-medium>Related boards>>>/h/hdg>>>/e/edg>>>/d/ddg>>>/b/degen>>>/vt/vtai>>>/aco/sdg>>>/trash/sdg
Blessed thread of frenship
official pixart bigma and hunyuan finetune waiting room
>Blessed thread of frenship>official pixart bigma and hunyuan finetune waiting room
Day 69 of posting Sigma gens until Bigma arrives
>>101733259I look like this
>>101733267It's a look
>>101733243bigma balls
>>101733287
1girl gens only below this post
>>101733306I wanna see this animated. Nothing like Joe swiveling around like a roomba after 'great' speech
>>101733297if you have a saved image you have a saved workflow, unless you intentionally save as jpg
>>101733286box?
are you splitting your sigmas?https://x.com/GiliBenShahar/status/1819996980023636188
Flux finally makes good mermaids. They have been dogshit for years, with shit like split tails, or tails too short just weird ass looking tails.
>>101733345https://files.catbox.moe/ofdf95.png>>101733352>want a stronger illustration style with Flux1? Just split sigmas at 1 or 2 and take the lower sigmasHow confusing. Not Sigma sigma, but flux sigma
>>101733352translation to retard please?
>>101733369sorry but can i have a catbox for that one too?
I'm a 8gb laptopjeet and can only reasonably generate flux with their service. Off to sdg I go?
>>101733382Oh to be loved/trolled. https://files.catbox.moe/0xjnj2.png
>>101733370sure here is a workflow that does a low sigma splithttps://openart.ai/workflows/neuralunk/flux-1-dev-fp8-low-sigma-split-runs-well-on-4060ti-16gb-32gb-sys-ram/tECUhCcFvh4jb7XFW8Jo
>>101733396you should be fine here as long as you don't post flux pro gens
>>101733418oh is this just running in fp8 for low vram? I don't really get it
>>101733331pic related vs old one >>101732992This was using 0.3 denoise, i could probably go higher since its not porn
>>101733480Whys that dude poking his nose?
>>101733480>>101733489and only 20 steps, time to increase to 50 steps and increase denoise
>>101733101I correct myself, if you prompt flux with some braincells working you can get almost anything out of it. Pic related.
prompt: gay pornkek
>>101733360>>101733465>>101733474>>101733580The end. I hope you liked my short story.
>>101733489Not anymore anon0.4 denoise, increased detail, probably I can go higher. https://files.catbox.moe/ep9dky.pngThe workflow is kind of a mess as it was just smashed together in the last 2 hours, but its not that bad. Can easy see what is happening, just need to sort the busses out at the top and what not.
>>101733604based str8 flux
What's the best resolution to gen with flux? The good old 1024x1024?
>>101733515>you can get almost anything out of it
>>101733657It gens up to 2048 fine but I haven't pushed it past that.
shame it doesnt know what nipples are
>>101733763It does. It's just filled with ugly nipples. It's better than SD3 who just barbied everyone. It's much easier to draw the nipples back on with a detailer for flux than SD3.
0.8 turned it into a cartoon, it needs more guidance in the prompt for photo realistic but its still pretty neat. at 0.6 it was better but some of the faces lacked detail, could prompt convert back for another pass in detector nodes to fix faces and then back into flux on a low denoise setting to get the finished result.
>>101733796I honestly don't think SD3 is worth talking about anymore. It's a complete failure, completely worthless.
>>101733817It's the closest point to comparison. They both had similar goals, a "safe" model that uses natural language prompting. SAI shitting the bed doesn't make it less of an apt comparison. Flux is certainly more comparable to SD3 than it is to XL.
>>101733796>It's much easier to draw the nipples back on with a detailer for flux than SD3.yep because at least there is something there for the AI to work with, otherwise you'd have to draw crude ones in image editor which is time consuming and bothersome.
>>101733763--> >>101733604
how do you prevent flux from genning a cartoon image?
>>101733852Yup. I had some limited success getting nipples onto SD3 barbies. The bigger issue was the complete and utter lack of navels. Like, what the fuck why is deleting navels "safe"?
>>101733880"photo", "photography", "3d render"
>>101733880Tell it not to. "A photograph of ..."
woah got an almost decent nipple herehttps://files.catbox.moe/smg0zg.png
>>101733892>>101733894ok thx, I tried 'photo realistic' I guess it has no concept of that tag.
>>101733914That's not very safe of you, Anon.I find it really easy to generate nipples, even if they look like they have been dipped in hot oil. Are you actually having a hard time of it?Just specify "Topless, nude, naked, nipples, breasts exposed"
I fart on the heads of all 1girlers.
>>101733946its difficult and doesnt give me nipples errytime
>>101733969Don't you want to kiss her though, Anon? Look at those lips
What were they thinking?
>>101734036This is pony, isn't it>>101733992https://files.catbox.moe/w70kv0.pngWhat I hate is even mens nipples are censored
>>101734068yep yep
>>101733892>>101733894it got a little better but the damn thing does not want to play, i guess i'll need to change seed. This is why i got bored with flux, the lack of consistency or control.
>>101734142I dunno man I feel like I have excellent control with it. What are you even prompting?
That is what I mean, its still cartoon, seed change is definitely genning something closer to a photo though.
>>101734162I think know why "3d render" would well durr do a 3d render >>101733892So no the wonder, i've removed that now and lets see...
>>101734142>>101734224It's extremely literal, Anon. >stylized abstract modern artwork featuring bright colours, complex geometric shapes form an abstract nude womans silhouette made of simple shapes, highly detailed, intricate visible brush strokes,
Bros i wanna proompt image like this
>>101734252>A photograph of a busy restaurant in china, Chinese family of 6 people are dining, photo, photographyis still producing cartoons, i have no interest in cartoons, why do people insist on trying so much of this garbage into the model? I have to stare at this god damn shit every day, its gets boring as fuck when you're getting older...
>>101734312yes i'd also like to gen images like this and not dumb ass cartoons. It really needs a negative prompt for this to filter out what I don't want.
>>101734312I got this close with proompting in flux
>>101734344Maybe it's time to stop being a manchild and start doing something better with your time.
maybe its over cooking the image i feed into it from pony?
>>101734368This. Like working.
How the FUCK do I get rid of the annoying depth of field? Preferably without the cfg meme workaround just to enable negative prompts because it works like shit and slows generation into oblivion
>>101734404" Clear background , detailed background " maybe
>>101734404have you ever used a camera before anon
>>101734312My attempt>>101734362Just stop genning cartoons, I don't understand the problem.
>>101734456>Just stop genning cartoons, I don't understand the problem.I'd because I'm doing something a bit different from you anon, I'm genning with pony only to send into flux to clean it up. pony can't handle so many people at range. Anyway pic related 0.7 denoise
>>101734362SDXL does good realism and has negative prompt
>>101734534its fucking horrible mate, its shite even with detailer... Its only good for portraits and stuff.
>>101734404picrel>>101734431pretty much, I don't get this complaint, he was moaning about it yesterday too.
>>101734534Look at how fucked up her eyes are. Flux has spoiled me. Everything look shit now. SHIT
>>101734534>>101734551but it does have a lot trained into it, things we would like to exist in flux. So for now I'm trying to figure a way to use it as inpainting on an image genned by pony/SDXL
>>101734404>>101734417Forgot to add - no amount of "detailed background", "in focus", "detailed" and other phrases work>>101734431Yeah, and I even tried adding "f/22 aperture camera" which apparently worked for some SDXL models in the past but alas>>101734552It's ogre...
>>101734583yeah you apparently haven't because you'd know how focus works
>>101734456This is Ideogram
>>101734600
>>101734620do you know how far those mountains are way from the camera?do you know how focus works
>>101734620Would
>bro why isn't the mountains always crisp like the real pictures
>>101734630do you know how a fucking camera works you dunce? You can see the digital ones to actually focus on a wide shot what ever you call it where detail isn't lost.
>>101734646that's not how physics works, retardshow me real photography of what you wantbecause it doesn't existyou can't have a subject 6 feet from the camera be in focus at the same time as something that is 3000 feet awaywhat you want requires EDITING
>>101734670like our eyes right?again you're fucking dunce.
G n bros
>>101734679yes anon, you do know how our eyes work right? your peripheral vision isn't crisp, retardholy shit i'm actually talking to a retard
>>101734691Then why do 1980's photos exist with out this problem if they require editing? Its the type of lens you moron, There is nothing wrong with my eyes, i see perfectly clear, i don't have tunnel vision etc. Do you wear glasses by chance? perhaps you should get your bloody eyes tested.
>>101734719It doesn't matter what you think you should or shouldn't be able to do, Anon, because you can't do it in Flux. it's simply not possible. Every image with a background has dof. This is just how the model is. There is 0 point in arguing about it. Accept this as a limitation of the model and work around it. Bashing your head against the wall for no reason isn't productive.
>>101734805no he's just going to produce three images, start bitching and call it a daybecause he's a faggot and a retard
>>101734691>your peripheral vision isn't crispWhat you're referring to is field of view fov and not depth, obviously you can't see behind you or too far to your sides. But what that other anon simple wants is focus on the big picture and to claim that requires editing is bloody moronic... The problem is dumb asses that can't use a camera properly post their armature photos online and the model gets trained on them. These days its just a setting that needs changed on a good digital camera, on most basic cameras it will capture the whole view focused and sharp, a telescopic camera will require you to focus on the subject, and so on.
the real issue is he's a low IQ promplet, he's incapable of experimentation and problem solvingeven f/22 is just him thieving from other people
farp
>>101734836
>>101734816https://www.ripeinsurance.co.uk/photography/exposure-triangle/aperture.htmlits how our eyes actually work faggot. Does not require editing.
>>101734805>This is just how the model is.Literally just answer with this. Why would you go far asking how camera works lol.
>>101734865my favorite part is you still can't produce real examples
>>101734874Pretty sure I told you exactly that yesterday. Are you going to come in tomorrow and complain about it again?
understand that the Flux devs deliberately targeted famous female names for scrubbing AND their caption model is shit and couldn't caption anything sexual whatsoever
Thread theme https://youtu.be/UlwsV6d6P1c?t=149
>>101735005They only deleted the names. The likenesses are still in there. I get them occasionally by accident.Not sure what your complaint about captioning is when the model is extremely coherent.
ldg brosShare a 3070 8G workflow for flux pls
>>101735044Based
so they scraped midjourney? that explains the generic greasy aiface and melting plastic skin. the more i scroll through the gallery the more obvious it becomes.
>>101735005also good chance their caption model is one of those that often describes subjects as "individuals" with zero genderingsee the LAION-POP captions for examples of that>>101735054any likeness when using female celeb names comes from CLIPof course occasionally you get someone that kinda looks like someone elseI'm talking about smut here, it knows little of it, that's the complain about the captioning, existing caption models suck describing adult topics
gm anons
>>101735183there are little to no celebrity names in there, I have little doubt they used a list to scrub any images matching those names>>101735235>Bruce Willis
I return to waiting for bigma
>>101735256they also did this with a bunch of characters, it's strange, some characters flux doesn't know by name, but if you word salad their wikia description in there they pop up. i guess this will make training some characters back in with loras easier.
Trying to use Flux shnell locally - it takes forever to get going after clicking 'Queue Prompt', fills my entire VRAM before it starts actually generating the image. Still hasn't finished generating 1 image and my PC is choking. Is there some box I need to check here? I have a 3090 so I cannot have more VRAM Oh, it failed but there's no error logged. What to do I need to do to get it to work correctly?
>>101735619I think that's a separate problem related to using AI to generate captions. Without going out of your way to ensure the names are in there the caption will either be too generic (ie "anime character", "animated character") or misnamed to a similar looking character. The only way to be accurate is using boorus and raw search titles.
>>101726162dammit
>>101735692deep
>>101735661the node at the top leftselect fp8_e4m3fn as the weight_dtype
dev 50 steps vs dev 4 steps vs dev + schnell merged 4 stepshttps://huggingface.co/sayakpaul/FLUX.1-merged
>>101735734those efforts are kind of useless because Dev has a non-commercial license, effort should be spent on Schnell only to keep the open source license
>>101735826schnell too schit to bother training
>>101735713>>101735661I was about to ask the same thing.ThanksTakes about 15sec for a 4090 to do one, damn
>>101735826mix the weights enough and people stop caring. licenses don't matter outside of gigacorps. dont forget the insane amount of shit people sold based on the leaked NAI model.
Damn bros, just found out about flux. It's not going to be doing anything amazing for nsfw yet is it? Especially anime.
>>101735879Entirely SFW but doesn't shit itself when posing women at least.best prompt adherence of any open model but styles/many popular characters/female celebrities can't be prompted for directly, they didn't survive the automatic captioning.
>>101735870Actually they do matter if you want to make any real money.
>>101735713Thank you anon, my hero!
>>101735902oh so dev license prevents faggots like nai from taking something open and locking it behind a paywall? good, time to keep devving on dev
>>101735918The dev license prevents ALL commercialization. That also means Civit can't host the model.
>>101735912>>101735857also make sure to add the flux guidance node after your prompt. most people are keeping the value between 1.5 and 2.5 for better prompt/style adherence
how to prompt belle delphine in flux?
>>101735932Civitai is already hosting both models lmao, go check
>>101735976Go ahead and waste your time then and get your cease and desist.
>>101735932you won't see someone like the pony guy making something out of it, but there will be plenty of people interested in making loras and such.
>>101735958Nice for some reason it reminds me of toy soldiers, like using my blankets as a battlefield while putting toy soldiers everywhere, I suppose making gens is partly that in a way
>>101735976Not for image gen.
>>101735992Yeah you're going to have some one-off loras, okay but the real finetunes that cost real money won't happen.
>>101735912That's a big fucking Greenland on the map
>>101735958Sorry I'm not sure what you mean and Googling it didn't bring anything back - I'm not used to Comfy UI (I hate node spaghetti).
>>101736047Replace your clip text encode node with ClipTextEncodeFlux
>>101736047https://comfyanonymous.github.io/ComfyUI_examples/flux/
>>101736047maybe this
>>101735734Tested it in the HF space. Pretty bad compared to Flux dev.
>>101735932>That also means Civit can't host the model.That's not why SD3 was banned kek
>>101736095As expected. It makes more sense to compare it to schnell with the same 4 steps.
8 GB vram bros, whats our status
>>101736032I want her to tell me "you're an apple of my eye"
>>101736193waiting
>>101736193Coping
>>101736193i mostly used dalle, so for me it's just a wait and see if there is going to be any loras or finetunes. dalle 3 was really fun for 6 months or so, then at some point i had seen 90% of what the model can do and just went back to local
>>10173625290% of what OpenAI let through. It was restricted from the start and it only got worse.God I wish someone leaked DALL-E 3
>>101736027That's the mercator projection for you.
>>101736193heard it can run with 8gb vram + system ram
flux lora training proving successful so far:https://x.com/ostrisai/status/1820462674230059328
>>101736193Honestly I expected worse.t. loading everything at fp16 on rtx 2080 with 32gb ram.
>>101736335I saw people with 12gb vram having much slower speeds, how does it even work?
>>101736380No idea. Staring comfyui with --normalvram --disable-xformers --use-pytorch-cross-attention (though it automatically loads flux in lowvram), Memory fallback is turned OFF in nvidia settings, however it still does fill up my RAM completely, which makes sense, otherwise it definitely wouldn't have worked. Also it occasionally offloads shit onto my pagefile, but my m2 ssd is pretty fast.
>>101736193
>>101734404I said this before but the way to do this for Flux is to describe everything in the background. Don't just say background of X and Y, literally describe every single thing in the background autistically, and add "detailed" to each description. Detailed actually does have influence, but "clear" and "in focus" don't, and actually may have a bad influence, don't use those words.Then if that's not enough, add styles that usually have sharp backgrounds. I like "Drawn in pencil" or "Sketched in pencil". Pic related is actually just "Drawn by Pablo Picasso." in the clip prompt.>>101734552I disagree.
>>101736380the rest of the system specs make a difference, fast nvme, fast cpu, fast ram etc
>>101736335speed like this is torture if you actually want to genbelieve me, I tried genning XL on a 1060, it's awful
Is clip for flux like in LLMs, aka the lower in the text the more important/impactful ?And what's the max size of a prompt?
>>101736538yes, it works like that on dalle, but thanks to no cfg, flux lacks creativity.just look at dev output when compared to pro:>>101715965>>101716030
>proompt her to say "I'm NOT a vramlet">picrelIt's self-aware
>>101734363No hint of nipples, sad.
>>101736603kek
we are making big leaps in lora training with fluxhttps://github.com/bghira/SimpleTuner/pull/622
>>101736619They should explore Adam mini, it's what I use for training 1.3B and it's very good for memory footprint
>>101736579>yes, it works like that on dalleNo? Never noticed dall-e 3 favoring later terms in the prompt. It's just like any diffusion model, what is first in the text has more influence.
>>101736651yeah i misread your comment, thought we were talking about not fully utilizing token limit
https://huggingface.co/sayakpaul/FLUX.1-merged
>>101736331Nice, it's just on schnell but that's pretty fast
They said it was impossible to train Flux lmaoNecessity breeds innovation
>>101736579Of course pro would look the best... I wonder what is actually different with dev.More training time?>>101736651Oh I see, thanks.
>>101736670What the hell, that works?
>>101736539these are all really nice, anon
>>101736739Of course, these models aren't magic outside of being really really big matrices.
I don't understand the difference between guidance and cfg
>>101736670>diffusion_pytorch_modelDoes this work with comfyui? New to this.
>>101736619>they even scrubbed finnish(ed) politicianfucking why, flux
>>101736855hmm , i get 3.8/1it with my 4060 ti 16gb and 64 gb ram @1280x1024 which is 1.3MPgetting a message loading in lowvram mode 13932.075i guess they have to optimize everything
>>101736995Finnland exists? I don't think they _needed_ to scrub them.
can flux create a texture like picrel?
>>101737332maybe? try "old print magazine texture"
>>101737146>i get 3.8/1it with my 4060 ti 16gb3.8s per iteration? I have the same GPU and get ~2.4s/it
>>101737407Same resolution ? i use flux1 dev,t5xxl_fp16,and clip li also use euler, simple
Also, flux doesn't know what a japanese Oni is , but still...
>>101736839>>101736851this time it's realistic stalenhaagunnerving
>>101736774thanks, I have been trying different loras and mix matching to see what comes out
And I just noticed the third leg >>101737527, damn
>>101737332not quite what you wanted.. its a fun gen anyhow.. I am not quite sure what the term for that print raster effect is
>>101737564ive tried dot matrix and halftone effect but no luck
>>101737474ah, didn't notice the res. at 1280x1024 I get just under 3s/itsame sampler and schedulerT5 is fp8 but that doesn't change the it/sI'm loading the model with weight_dtype fp8_e4m3fn
>>101737590is it good or bad when the s/it is high?
>>101737640meant it/s sorry
currently using SwarmUI with Flux Schnell and i'm wondering why my preview changes so much. I get happy with the preview and then it changes a whole lot. Can i make it more stable?
>>101737658it/s high good s/it high bad>>101737582>>101737332I got it>Neon Genesis Evangelion robot Typo-01, red sky. Old print 90s magazine texture, grained. Visible print texture. Print raster, rasterization effect. Visible grainy raster. cmyk dot pattern, four color print rasterthis is the important part that made it appear "cmyk dot pattern, four color print raster"
>>101737699>it/s high good>s/it high badwtf does any of that shit mean anyway?
>>101737736>it/siterations per second, ergo you want many iterations in one second cause 20 iterations in one second are better than 10 iterations in one second>s/itsecond per iteration, when your it/s drops below 1 it flips to seconds per iteration, so you want that low, cause 20 seconds for one iteration is worse than 10 seconds for one iterationmy my
>>101737697Okay fuck it, i realized that not using a scheduler in the sampler made it all random. not it's more consistent.
>>101737736it / s = iterations per second.in your KSampler settings there's a parameter called 'steps' that tells you how many iterations the gen will take. your it/s determines how many steps per second your hardware can do (and how fast it takes to finish)when it / s is really low, it switches to s/it (seconds per iteration) meaning each 'step' is taking multiple seconds
>>101737762>>101737781man this shit is confusing af.so lets say I generate an image with 30 steps (pic related) and it takes in total 44.62 seconds and 00:27 seconds for the steps and it shows 1.11 it/s.is that a good value or nah?
>>101737699thanks. I've removed the "old 90s print" and it's definitely getting closer
What's the consensus on genning settings in flux?I'm using euler 25 steps genning at 1024x1536 (no upscaling)Don't think it requires upscale like SD1.5 right?
>>101737762>Weird errors on the left marginWhy is that?
>>101737854if you can reach 1it/s with flux it means you are part of the 1%
>>101737854it's all relativeyou're probably better off than most people in this thread
>>101737590I had weight set to default, changing to weight_dtype fp8_e4m3fn lowered it to 2.80-3 s/it
>>101737857shame about the training on an Eva likeness
>>101737873thats the 90s print style thing, you are probably to young to have seen that in real live, but many printed pages there were color indexes coded on the side, that were normally cut off when glueing in the pages, when they were cut wrong, or you ripped the pages out you could sometimes still see them
>>101737031>>101737098Can it do bukkake? At least some vague shit like "white cream on face" etc
>>101736855Just get a 5080 Ti 48GB.
>>101737943get creative with white slime .. maybe make it transparent slime
>>101737871everything up to 1536x1536 seems to work fine with no upscalingI've found 30 steps is plenty and more than that may just be placebo. Their web interface defaults to 28 so I figured 30 would be a good setting for max quality without waiting too long.
>>1017379785080 will be 20GB .. NVidia doesn't care about us
>>101738009No large company does. It's all J3ws trying to milk money out of you, the goyim supporter of our greatest ally Israel.
>>101738009they are going to make the 5070 12gb again aren't they?
>>101737994I'll try 30 instead of 25, thanks
The truth is out there
>>101738121We definitely fleegin!
>>101738159>>101738287My inner child is in love right now.
>>101737893only 1% here have a 4090?
>downloaded flux>try a couple of gens>immediately want to delete it
>>101738174WE WILL HAVE VRAM
>>101738336can you at least explain why?
>>101738336perhaps a model that accepts 1girl, spread anus, giant stinky asshole will be more your speed
>>1017383453mins per gen
Come and get it...>>101738379>>101738379>>101738379
>>101738334I gues here its more, but overall thats about correct. Steam hardware survey says 0.92% of all GPUs are 4090s.
>>101733360>>101733465>>101733474>>101733580Come back to me when it can do more seamless tails
>>101738334I am not paying 2k for a GPU, kthxbye
>>101738366thats not all that long tho.could be much worse dudealso why not upgrade your PC?>>101738395> Steam hardware survey says 0.92% of all GPUs are 4090s.wtf, I thought it would be way more.
>>101738336
test
>>101738361yes
>>1017384163090s are $700
>>101738485nice.
>>101738416why not?its worth every cent.
>>101738499cheapest around here is:€ 1528,09As for RTX 4090, it's € 1799, so those went down in price since last time I checked apparently.>>101738556you think so? I do not.
>>101738605yeah I'm having a blast a 4090 is worth every cent. its the best thing you can buy.
>>101738485Awesome
>>101738605You can train shit with a 4090, there's almost infinite value, very cheap for a hobby ultimately.
>>101736604Nipple is not important here
>>101736579>but thanks to no cfg, flux lacks creativity.you can do cfg with thishttps://reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/1ekgiw6/heres_a_hack_to_make_flux_better_at_prompt/
>>101737857The lattice you see on here is actually what flux does when it's cooked. I have several examples that I can't show you because image limit
>>101736995Probably most female sounding names.
ever since I fucked around with the CFG shit the generating became a lot slower.even after I changed it back to the standard workflow.what this means? restarting also didnt really fix it