What went so wrong?This is like 14nm+++ all over again.
they have a quasi monopoly now that intel is imploding.
what's wrong with 14nm you fucking retarded zoomer?Intel chips are melting down because trannysistors smaller than 10nm aren't good at anything but catching entire chip on fire due to being too densely packed
I want to see Windows 10 benchmarks. Zen 5 works amazing with Linux.
>>101918326>$300 10850k intel's 14+++ processors were finezen5 would be too, if they had priced it right
>>101918326The ryzen team learned new tricks from the rdna3 team
>>101919794If that's true then that's really embarrassing. Imagine such an experienced company still making noob mistakes like that.
>>101920541>mlidYou can be sure it's not true in the slightest.
>>1019205412 weeks back he was claiming zen 5 was the second coming of christ and now he changes his tune, he's just a larping fraud
>>101921364You're wrong though
>>101918326TSMC didnt have a huge improvement, so AMD didn't either.All of ryzens prior performance increases correlated precisely with a substantial node-size shrink.AMD (and apple) owes a lot of it's success to TSMC.
>>101923151All of them do. All their generational improvements would be marginal without TSMC.
>>101923151Zen 3 used the exact same nodes Zen 2 did, and probs had Ryzen's biggest generational gain. (Against Ryzen, O.G. Zen of course had hueg gains vs Piledriver.)
>>101919794it really feels like zen 2.5but still [citation needed]
