Blessed thread of frenship

Imggen

>>102192242

>>102200667
You can gen degenerate shit

File: 2024-09-02_00331_.png (1.46 MB, 1024x1024)

1.46 MB PNG

>>102200628
thanks

File: Flux-20240902_170640-gen-(...).png (1.64 MB, 1344x768)

1.64 MB PNG

>>102200637
Blessed thread of sunglasses and of course MIKU. happy now, mikuman?

>>102200703
nah

File: file.png (2.07 MB, 1024x1024)

2.07 MB PNG

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rSoo9WS8t7k

File: joy.png (418 KB, 1024x1024)

418 KB PNG

>>102199851
This was my favorite and couldn't be reproduced by JoyCaption.
>This is a highly stylized CGI image featuring two anthropomorphic, spherical characters. The larger character is bright red with a glossy finish, giving it a shiny, almost reflective quality. Its exaggerated features include large, wide-open eyes with black pupils and white irises, a prominent, protruding tongue sticking out, and a wide, toothy grin revealing small white teeth. The smaller character is a glossy purple sphere with similar exaggerated features, including large, round eyes with black pupils and white irises, a protruding tongue, and a toothy grin. Both characters are perched on thin, wooden sticks that emerge from the top of their heads, giving them a whimsical, almost surreal appearance. The background is a plain, light gray, creating a stark contrast with the vibrant colors of the characters. The image is highly polished and smooth, with a glossy texture that enhances the shiny, almost plastic-like appearance of the spheres. The lighting is soft and even, casting gentle shadows that add depth and dimension to the characters. The overall style is playful and cartoonish, with a focus on exaggerated expressions and vibrant, contrasting colors. The image evokes a sense of whimsy and fun, reminiscent of a child's imagination brought to life in a digital medium.
Good captioner when?

File: 2024-09-02_00360_.png (1.26 MB, 1216x832)

1.26 MB PNG

>>102201007
>whimsy
JoyCaption loves that word.

File: 1724608216895406.jpg (199 KB, 1600x1107)

199 KB JPG

>>102200769
Thank you so much for this pal. Can I do this with, let's say, 20+ pictures of my womanfriend? Our dogs? I already have a model of myself I made 1.5 years ago, and it came out pretty decent with only 13 images.

Picrel - It's me

https://huggingface.co/Shakker-Labs/AWPortrait-FL
I think we got the real first finetune of flux

>>102201116
>trained by DynamicWang
if that's not ourguy I don't know who is

File: file.png (2.04 MB, 1120x1360)

2.04 MB PNG

why should I use flux?

>>102201090
simple answer: yes

File: compare.jpg (783 KB, 2904x1520)

783 KB JPG

>>102201116
>when your cherry picked examples looks worse than the base model
shit sux

>>102201180
it might heal you from your degenerate gooning

>>102201184
What are you talking about? The faces look a lot more natural, unless you enjoy the generic Dreamshaper 1girl shiny buttchin face it's an obvious improvement

>>102201236
>unless you enjoy the generic Dreamshaper 1girl shiny buttchin face it's an obvious improvement
now that you say that it's true that the buttchin is gone, that's a good news

File: Screenshot 2024-09-02 084745.png (1.48 MB, 2091x1221)

1.48 MB PNG

>>102201184
>improvement:
>lower skin detail
>lower clothing detail
>uglier
>fucked up the hair
>muted colors
could've baked a lora with better results

>>102201314
must've taken ages to go with that resolution, but it's worth at the end, love the details in it

What's the state of pornography with Flux, skill issue with the GB sized Loras or no finetunes? or something else?

>>102201294
>Make everything unnaturally shiny
>omg it's so le detailed!!pwxj

>>102201182
Excellent; thanks! I'll post what I make later or tomorrow lel

File: 00111-924354412.png (1.34 MB, 1024x1024)

1.34 MB PNG

>>102201292

File: 2024-09-02_00367_.jpg (910 KB, 3648x2496)

910 KB JPG

>>102201336
>must've taken ages to go with that resolution
a while
>Prompt executed in 279.83 seconds

>>102201374
holo-migu maybe?

>>102201341
There's some fuckery related to layers and base model distillation. Check again in two weeks.

>>102201352
>turns space buns into a hatchet job mullet
>"incredible."

>>102201394
I will ask a gpt what this means so I can understand your answer, thank you for taking the time.

File: 1700251264057655.webm (591 KB, 320x444)

591 KB WEBM

>>102200864
In relation to this, what is meant by "good captioning"? Another anon mentioned about having 20 images named 1.jpg, 2.jpg etc. so I'm wondering where "captions" and specific settings come into making a LORA.

File: 2024-09-02_00372_.jpg (797 KB, 3648x2496)

797 KB JPG

>>102201386

File: L2__00014_.png (714 KB, 1024x1024)

714 KB PNG

damn my Yoshiaki Kawajiri style lora fucked up, epoch 2 looks better than epoch 16, and 2 is still shit kek

>>102201489
Try reading a guide instead of doing zero effort

File: 00054-2041106580.png (617 KB, 616x808)

617 KB PNG

woke up to confusing lack of ban

File: 1700644694394209.gif (2.52 MB, 390x373)

2.52 MB GIF

>>102201573
I'm querying on something another anon posted, not doing zero effort.

>>102201599
"what is a caption"
you haven't even done basic research
anyways I know you're a low effort troll
just saying if you're a real person, do real effort

>>102201536
>the darth vader manlet
jej

File: 2024-09-02_00377_.jpg (944 KB, 3840x2160)

944 KB JPG

>>102201636
Darth Migu dwarves everyone

File: 1721184737098895.png (1.13 MB, 1786x1030)

1.13 MB PNG

>>102201634
>"what is a caption"
"What is meant by "good captioning"?" was the actual quote.
Fuck off retard and stop spewing your fake quotes.

Booru Tags Chad
>masterpiece, high quality, 1girl, giant boobs, maid outfit, freckles, blue eyes, smiling, black hair
Natural Language Virgin
>This is a high-resolution photograph featuring a young woman dressed in a classic French maid outfit. She has a fair complexion with a sprinkle of freckles on her cheeks and nose, and her skin appears smooth. She has long, straight, jet-black hair that cascades past her shoulders, complemented by a white maid's headpiece with a ruffled edge. Her eyes are a striking blue, and she has a gentle, inviting smile.

File: 000000_17242_.png (2.31 MB, 1032x1508)

2.31 MB PNG

>>102201582
Nice color balancing

>>102201736
how do you booru tags chad with 2 girls? the model won't know which tag is supposed to go into which girls

>>102201736
Such a good post you had to post it twice

>please just generate random images loosely correlating to my prompt
You know, you can just use SDXL/Pony, it's peaked for "I'm feeling lucky" prompts.

File: xyz_grid-0000-3760933609.jpg (1.26 MB, 2816x3351)

1.26 MB JPG

>>102201116
Interesting. It does make faces more natural and eliminates the buttchin plague. Now to test if it can do anything besides portraits

>>102201664
Hmm, that's basically me except I'm on a bed with a topper with 8 pillows and a plasma TV at my side.

>>102201782
replaces one same face with another same face

>>102201725
Prompt?

>>102201736
>Missed the new thread and posted this at the bottom of the old one

>>102201736
tag models are 1girl-centric, everything else is basically the 1girl's bodypart to them, they don't need grammar
the more the model "understands" inter-actor relationships the more you need boomer prompting

>>102201817
>that house party POV meme

>>102201748
What? Who cares about what girl has what features? That has never been important.
Caring about that part of prompt adherence ruined AI image generation, please AI model, be creative without me having to specify what you have to draw and where.

>>102201844
No one made you stop using Pony.

>>102201844
>What? Who cares about what girl has what features? That has never been important.
this has to be bait

>>102201844
a (You) for the retard

>SDcels unlearned how to describe objects in natural language
grim

>>102201736
It's almost like 1girl slop is trivial to gen and can be handled just fine by an inferior system

>>102201771
>skill issue
many such cases

>>102201872
There is no skill typing in random tags. There's also no control. It's really no different that using that combination of tags as a search on a booru except instead of finding existing images you're randomly generating them. Like I said already, you can use Pony, it still exists, the thing you want literally exists right now.

>>102201804
What is worse, the white girl and the asian girl have the sameface.
What happened with the Dreamlike photoreal guys? They has the model with the most varied faces this side of Stable Diffusion 1.5, and you could use merge block weights to make the faces more varied of any other model, it even remained more popular than nsfw models.
Did they just gave up?

>>102201838
Whoosh.

>>102201887
For some reason they insist on training on tiny datasets.

>>102201894
No.

>>102201782
are you kidding the faces are so smooth now, that's not natural at all

File: 7Gn2PFsvaN.png (973 KB, 724x626)

973 KB PNG

anyone notice that the preview latent image is more saturated with better colors than the resulting vae decoded image w/ flux? I'm using the default ae vae that came with flux

>>102201912
you're the reason why TVs are oversaturated from the factory

>>102201852
I used Pony once and found it so blurry compared with my SD1.5 based models generation, I made a challenge about making a Pony generation that couldn't be reproduced by some SD1.5 model, and nobody replied because Pony is the inferior architecture, other than better hands and anatomy coherence.

File: delux_me_00029_.jpg (378 KB, 896x512)

378 KB JPG

>>102201800
>8 pillows
psycho

>>102201897
>2,000 fashion photography photos
So that was the problem? They say that as if
>CAN YOU BELIEVE IT? THAT'S TWO THOUSAND PHOTOS! A WHOLE TWO FOLLOWED BY THREE ENTIRE ZEROES!!

File: xyz_grid-0003-43.png (3.67 MB, 2048x1303)

3.67 MB PNG

>>102201782

>>102201916
Yes, it bugs me often.
>Wow looking good
>Finishes
>Here's your washed out image sir

Then I go to photoshop and increase vibrance.

>>102201907
Yes, the joke is asking for a prompt of an obvious meme picture, and you missed it.

>>102201982
Even better probably 2000 photos of 20 different people.

>>102201800
So then not even close to you

>>102202003
Do you think it is a serious prompt, you autistic fuck.

>>102201989
>finetune only on human's face
>got worse houses as a result
lol

File: 2024090201.jpg (3.07 MB, 2096x2096)

3.07 MB JPG

I can't wait till the weather gets all fall-y

File: file.png (1.17 MB, 1024x1024)

1.17 MB PNG

>>102202028

>>102202041
What does that have to do with image generation?

>>102201916
Huh? That's a VAE thing that has always been there. At the stage the VAE was trained it learned pictures were never that saturated.
To fix it in the Stable Diffusion 1.5 days the kl-f8-anime2.ckpt VAE had to be trained (along with making it produce more detailed anime eyes when the faces were small) to add more color but it brought other problems like color bleeding, but nobody could improve on it.
You need a better VAE, SD's original VAE was also terrible until vae-ft-mse-840000 was released.

canny belieb some anon like the look of sloppa

>>102201932
4 of them flatten so fast I need to spend hours every 2 weeks making them fluffy again. I wonder what other people do about it, I've never heard about people having to spend so much time dealing with flattened pillows.

File: 00059-1337155345.png (923 KB, 1008x688)

923 KB PNG

>>102202056

>>102202054
One day your autistic brain will realize what happened but this will be way in the bottom of things you have went tard autist over.

>>102201970
I just want the best of both worlds. If both technologies exists why can't I have them?
>inb4 you aren't entitled to anything

>>102202078
Better quality pillows, anon, those don't flatten. There is memory foam too.

File: file.png (1.67 MB, 1024x1024)

1.67 MB PNG

>>102202084
interesting how quickly this moved from your bad faith troll questions
it's almost like it was never about that

>>102200705
Such a sweet bumble bee, such breasts, I dream of milk and honey...

File: 2024090211.jpg (3.25 MB, 2096x2096)

3.25 MB JPG

>>102202056
Do you know why all the villains in movies are utilitarian

File: delux_yo_00030_.jpg (583 KB, 896x512)

583 KB JPG

>>102202027
damn bro I wanna get shripped on war crimes

>>102202091
there is no best of both worlds, you either have excellent composition largely derived from boomer captions or you have a random image generator based on captions

>>102202000
Increasing vibrance crushes the dynamic range of colors, not unlike compressing the sound of music.
You should increase the saturation instead to preserve it.

>>102202096
What questions? I didn't ask any fucking thing.
Get the fuck out of here, debo.

File: BigLust__00053_.png (1.89 MB, 1080x1576)

1.89 MB PNG

>>102201828
I'll post again next bread

>>102202026
I mean, the part where I ask people to do stuff for me and they all do it. And the beard and look and clothes.

File: file.png (980 KB, 1024x1024)

980 KB PNG

>>102202119

>>102201887
>it even remained more popular than nsfw models
The majority of the cult followers believe that, someday, someone will give them a nsfw finetune, so they keep honing their boomer prompting skills waiting for that day.

File: xyz_grid-0005-3520356633.png (2.36 MB, 2048x1303)

2.36 MB PNG

>>102201989

>>102202036
They raped the weights.
They probably trained a giant lora and merged it into a model and called it "a finetune".

>>102202147
For the record if you did a real full fine tune with 2000 images you'd have a similar result. You really need a minimum of like 200,000 diverse images to not rape the model.

>>102202119
And that endless fucking miku SPAMMER is ok?

>102202177
debo with the whataboutism

>>102202177
he's German, there's no helping it

File: Flux-20240902_171141-gen-(...).png (1.37 MB, 1344x768)

1.37 MB PNG

>>102202134
not sold & thanks for the pics!

File: file.png (651 KB, 1024x1024)

651 KB PNG

I admire the effort to change tactics

>file.png

>>102202224
>>102202242
get a room, lovebirds

File: 00076-760941677.png (1.17 MB, 1024x1024)

1.17 MB PNG

flux struggles with this vibe

>>102202254
I've just arrived in this thread, who are you?

File: PILLOWSFLUX.png (1.31 MB, 1024x1024)

1.31 MB PNG

>>102202093
I've tried many materials, there's nothing more fluffy than polyester, they're like literal clouds, specially when you put them 6 on top of each other, it's what the heaven of comfort must feel like.
Except a week later they've lost half their softness and 2 weeks later they're unusable and have to be opened and restored. They're hotel pillows, I guess there's people with the job of doing this over there.
>This is a highly detailed, digitally rendered photograph featuring a girl sleeping on a bed that is completely covered with an array of colorful and patterned pillows. She appears to be in her early 20s, lying on her back with her eyes closed, wearing a gray sweatshirt and gray pajama pants. She is partially covered by a white blanket, with her socks sticking out from the bottom of the bed. The bed itself has a simple, modern design with a light gray upholstered headboard and a light blue fitted sheet. Surrounding the bed are numerous pillows in various shapes, sizes, and colors, including shades of blue, yellow, orange, pink, and white. Some pillows have patterns such as stripes, dots, and checks. The background wall is plain and light beige, drawing attention to the colorful chaos of pillows. The floor is visible at the bottom of the image, showing a small, woven rug in a light gray color. The overall composition of the image is cluttered but visually appealing, with a mix of textures from the soft fabrics of the pillows and bedding, creating a cozy and inviting atmosphere. The lighting is soft and even, enhancing the warm and comforting feel of the scene.

File: 00063-[fluxRealisticV1_v1(...).jpg (579 KB, 2688x3456)

579 KB JPG

The Fluxubus is not kawaii. Also has a ramdom button on her chest.

File: file.png (1.78 MB, 1024x1024)

1.78 MB PNG

>>102202177
lmaooooo

>>102202294
Miku is just the new Emma posting.

>>102202309
Nice. What would happen if you posted it on civitai?

File: flux-awportrait.jpg (2.39 MB, 2554x1600)

2.39 MB JPG

left is flux-dev-fp8, right awportrait

Also, flux realism lora and other flux loras i've tested are not compatible with AWportrait (it gives me shitty results)

>>102202113
If I learned something after merging so many models is that some compromise can be made, not as dependent on boomer captions as flux, but good enough, and not as creative a SD1.5, but good enough, we have the extremes, we should be able to have something in the middle.

>>102202327
on the right it's basically the same woman after putting some botox in her face

>>102202338
Good enough sounds a little bland
It'll be interesting if someone does attempt to do a schizophrenic dataset though that is 33% random LAION alt tags, 33% booru tags and 33% boomerisms

>>102202327
nick feldman prefers right, more childlike
-nick

File: ComfyUI_temp_jbgux_00136_.png (3.28 MB, 1280x1600)

3.28 MB PNG

>>102202327
same settings with awportrait and using flux realism lora and amateur photo lora

File: ComfyUI_01250_.png (1.77 MB, 1024x1024)

1.77 MB PNG

>>102202321
dunno, probably a ban

>>102202159
Ah, I've heard about those, pictures that aren't what you are training the model about but about preserving what is being lost.
I also heard you only need as many as the one you're training so they could have avoided this by having 2000 pics that did this.

>>102202373
Modern culture only tolerates safe edgy

>>102202327
Gloves, dress, pitchfork, chair, horns are all better defined in awportrait but the overall look feels more fabricated instead of photorealistic. Does it become messy if you lower guidance?

>>102202294
don't you "lmao" me, kraut, esp. not with the quintuple "o" variant, which went out of style approx. 20 year ago. just like your migu. just joking btw, you go. spam her until the rockets start flying.
>>102202371
can sell that as art or something
>>102202373
instagib

>>102202110
damn this makes my eyes feel nice

>>102202373
>>102202391
>>102202409
Need a civitai but politically incorrect

>>102202390
That's not really necessary for Loras but for a full fine tune it's necessary because your 2000 images heavily biases the model in a specific direction. These models ultimately have limited knowledge as dictated by their parameters so if you heavily train a small set of images (anything less than 100k is small) you are dramatically dragging all the weights towards those 2000 images which ultimately harms the entire model.

>>102202418
only 4chan is politically incorrect nowdays, and twitter maybe?

>>102200628
How does a distilled SDXL model look so much more kino than every pic that has been posted here by Flux?
https://www.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/1f3wtme/this_is_dmd2_colab_in_comment/

Why does everyone still take the Flux pill? With artists removed it's basically even worse than SDXL at aesthetics. Flux is basically a massive waste of computational power if you don't need a precise prompt but just pretty 1girl images.

File: file.png (807 KB, 960x512)

807 KB PNG

>>102202451
???
get your eyes checked anon

>>102202291
>button on her chest
That's a wart.

>>102202451
>Why does everyone still take the Flux pill? With artists removed it's basically even worse than SDXL at aesthetics.
Loras exist, thank god!

File: ComfyUI_temp_xdequ_00002_.png (3.01 MB, 1600x1360)

3.01 MB PNG

>>102202406
let me test, seems like they messed around with the guidance (default 3.5 doesn't seem as burnt as the original dev model)

File: 00066-[fluxRealisticV1_v1(...).jpg (581 KB, 2688x3456)

581 KB JPG

>>102202459
Warts, of course.

BTW any news on face-id for Flux?

>>102202457
Pure kino, Flux can't do anything close to this.

File: file.png (1.75 MB, 1024x1024)

1.75 MB PNG

>>102202409
>you go. spam her until the rockets start flying.
yay~

File: file.png (1.35 MB, 1024x1024)

1.35 MB PNG

I've seen $99 LCDs from 2009 with better contrast than SDXL

File: ComfyUI_01254_.png (1.27 MB, 1024x1024)

1.27 MB PNG

>>102202409
>>102202391
>>102202418

File: ComfyUI_temp_jbgux_00141_.png (3.06 MB, 1600x1360)

3.06 MB PNG

>>102202469
this are the same settings with lower guidance (1.8)
>>102202469 = 3.5 guidance

>>102202289
Also, I found a new fetish. When a pic comes like that I change the pants for shorts and regenerate.
Having her with shorts from the start does nothing for me, but this before and after uncovering is some ay ay ay canta y no llores for me, for some reason.
Oddly arousing.

>>102202491
Good thing no one is forcing you to use Flux, feel free to post your SDXL gens here lmao

Will it leak?
https://xcancel.com/imgn_ai/status/1830640185178259708

>"does NOT have butt chin"
>even larger more defined butt chin
bros..

>>102202327
> flux loras i've tested are not compatible with AWportrai
It's like PonyXL! Except it makes the original model worse!

>>102202451
CARS BRO. & text. I don't get the mindset, use whatever. want that style? go use SDXL. want emmi deep throat cum guzzle? use pony. (and upscale with flux to get a perfect face ahaha)

>>102202515
desu I don't want it to leak, the pictures looks like regular SD1.5 slop finetunes, I sleep

>>102202519
Negation language doesn't really work with how AI captions work. There would never be an image tagged with "the X does not have Y". Everything is adjective based like "empty glass". You do not say "the car is not red" you say "the car is blue"

>>102202364
>Good enough sounds a little bland
The models I was using were "good enough" before Flux dropped.
Now it's like the Super Nintendo dropped and all my NES games look like crap in comparison. I had "great" generations done by Analog Diffusion, but when I tried them on Flux, other than the guy not looking like Han Solo at all, looked like actual photos and not some AI slop.
I can't wait for a model that makes Flux look bad in comparison.

>>102202501
they both look suprisingly fuckable. I'll take the 2.6 guidance one, thank you.
>>102202496
said this before, that can easily be fixed with any fucking photo editor in 0.24 seconds

>>102202501
The lower guidance looks pretty decent too honestly with the more subdued and grainier look. Kinda makes me think of an actual photo. Though some details are maybe a bit weird.

>>102202573
I'm not going to color correct every image because the model sucks. But go ahead and use SDXL, no one is forcing you to upgrade.

when will AI art be gud?

File: 87887978987.png (2.11 MB, 1848x780)

2.11 MB PNG

>>102202461
While I'm a big advocate of LoRAs for Flux, even I know it's nothing but pure cope. They will not be able to get the base model's level of abstraction for creativity. Also consider the average quality of LoRAs like pic rel, it is an absolute mess. Only a very good checkpoint the size of Pony would help, but no one is doing this for dev, at least for open source reasons due to its license. Also this is worsened by the fact that while a LoRA might exist, not everyone has the proper hardware to train one, and not everyone is good at training LoRAs, so their LoRA might not be the best for a particular style.

>>102202581
please dont use slurs itt.

>>102202409
>can sell that as art or something
What people are doing is generating images with AI and then making a painting out of them by using traditional methods like oil or such, and selling them. I guess it's easier than hiring a model or being accused of palgiarism for copying an existing composition.

File: file.png (1.04 MB, 1024x1024)

1.04 MB PNG

"people don't make Loras how I like so the model must be bad"
is this just a troll, laziness or vramlet cope?

>>102202587
yeah I can't help but agree with you anon, I wish there will be a great finetune that will add more concepts into it, and I still hope someone will do it, but for the moment we can cope with Loras, it's still better than nothing and the generic Flux slop style

>>102201116
it's trash

File: flux-awportrait3.jpg (2.76 MB, 3202x1600)

2.76 MB JPG

>>102202327
nevermind what i said about loras with awportrait (i was using a lower guidance), with the normal 3.5 guidance it seems they work fine, left is dev with loras, middle is awportrait with loras and same guidance (1.8), right is awportrait with loras and normal guidance (3.5)

>>102202621
I know that girl on the right from a video

how do you fix comfyui gettin stuck on. a prompt? i typed something totally new but its still generating the last proimpt

>>102202426
What I don't get is why can't we have what we'd have if Black Forest Labs had those new 2000 pictures in the dataset, say, among the billions of pictures they had having 2000 ones of Street Fighter characters added wouldn't have hurt the model and it'd just know how to draw them.
But as it is finetuning the 2000 new pictures without ruining the model is hard, why can't we teach the model about them as if their training would have continued?

>>102202634
you disconnected something or have reroute/bypass fuckery

>>102202634
control after generate randomize

>>102202537
Aesthetic art is not a particular style. Aesthetic art is... well, aesthetic. You are seeing examples of what Flux could've been on that post. The bar is so low that it's shocking so many have complacently settled for less. Perhaps it's because they have never been exposed to aesthetic models before.

File: SDXL_crystalClearXLPrime_(...).png (1.47 MB, 832x1216)

1.47 MB PNG

>>102202583
dude I posted 100s of flux gens here. the godzilla girl further up and every other fucking gen with that filename is me. & I still occasionally use sdxl, fucking why not. here, made with sdxl, today. but let's not.
>>102202603
absolutely viable and cool (I guess)

>>102202639
>But as it is finetuning the 2000 new pictures without ruining the model is hard, why can't we teach the model about them as if their training would have continued?
because of catastrophic forgetting, it's been 30 years we've been trying to fix that pheonomenon, without much success
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catastrophic_interference#:~:text=Catastrophic%20interference%2C%20also%20known%20as,information%20upon%20learning%20new%20information.

>>102202469
What the fuck? What happened to her eyes and why do they look worse than AnythingV3's eyes?

File: 00064-1305773398.png (986 KB, 688x888)

986 KB PNG

bosch lora

>>102202639
Because training the model itself is having 50 million images which pull the weights in different directions and through pure randomness and billions of tiny wriggles forcing the model to somehow replicate each image of the dataset with specific captions we somehow get it to learn specific subjects and concepts. Basically put, we're brute forcing "learning" and through essentially magic we get a neural network to hallucinate images that look like our prompts. What you want won't work until we have an AI that can literally train on a single image, like a human artist.

File: Part2.png (1.25 MB, 1024x1024)

1.25 MB PNG

>>102202289 (You)
>>102202503
lmao forgot pic

File: ▲▲▲8 in.jpg (293 KB, 1080x864)

293 KB JPG

>>102202653
indeed

>>102202680
the shorts made her Asian

File: bamef[1].png (1.41 MB, 896x1152)

1.41 MB PNG

>>102202611
Flux does have a problem with "generic slopping" itself, particularly in terms of when you prompt for certain subjects you will get photorealism even though you prompted for a completely different style.
Loras help but I still think Flux is somewhat versatile on its own, a lot of people are not even using CFG, just the guidance, because it becomes much slower if you do. However depending on prompt it helps a ton. This is guidance 0.8 with CFG 2.0 without loras for example which helps with a rough horror manga style.

>>102202543
Indeed, the SD1.5 sameface and all.

File: SDXL_artium_v20.safetenso(...).png (1.43 MB, 832x1216)

1.43 MB PNG

>>102202652
I am very much frustrated with flux, also my hardware is hardly sufficient. best not to think about what flux could've been. play to it's strengths, use it for upscaling (does fucking wonders esp when it comes to keeping the facial structure intact), hand and feet inpainting. it adds something good to the table and thats what matters in the end. bla

>>102202564
Except "no humans". Many furry models of the SD1.5 era insert girls in all your pictures and the only way to fix them is to put "no humans" in the prompt, then your furries are perfect.
People brought in datasets with antropomorphic animal pictures tagged as "no humans" for this.

File: qWKuE[1].png (1.69 MB, 896x1152)

1.69 MB PNG

>>102202701

File: ComfyUI_temp_xdequ_00015_.png (2.29 MB, 1120x1600)

2.29 MB PNG

its ok i guess, feels like this awportrait model is undertrained

>>102202586
Post good art to compare.

>>102202728
Thanks for talking about an exception and specific case

Just deleted all my SD and SDXL checkpoints and loras, 280 GB total.

File: ComfyUI_temp_jbgux_00156_.png (2.28 MB, 1120x1600)

2.28 MB PNG

also like in the HF page of the model, seems like the mouth and teeth are fucked up

>>102202758
gwahahaha. Fucking spacelet.

>>102202771
Turn your lora off moron

>>102202758
280 GB is nothing in [current year] but if you feel like you will never touch them again then fair. For me Flux is still too ineffective for a lot of specific use purposes, not to mention all the various controlnets and stuff that only work on 1.5/XL

File: ComfyUI_temp_xdequ_00020_.png (2.29 MB, 1120x1600)

2.29 MB PNG

>>102202785
loras or not loras, they still look like shit

>>102202655
Aha, so maybe neural networks are the problem and people of the future will use something else to generate pictures that people will be able to train without this problem.
I had hoped the extra parameters would help, but after 2000 pics the model seems to be forgetting as much as 2B models.

File: ComfyUI_temp_jbgux_00160_.png (2.31 MB, 1120x1600)

2.31 MB PNG

hair also looks crappy, skin is ok i guess as it doesn't produce so much skin folds like fluxdev

straight to the trash bin it goes

File: Part3.png (1.25 MB, 1024x1024)

1.25 MB PNG

>>102202700
Yeah, I have to turn on my suspension of disbelief and gaslight myself to think she looks like that when she turns around.
And I can keep going and going with this, this one would do nothing for me unless I see the other ones first.

>>102202897
you could roughly paint over the legs with the skin tone and inpaint that area so everything else remains the same.

>>102202758
What if you had many SD checkpoints that had been lost and people had no way to download them?
This is like deleting all your Doctor Who episodes including the only copy remaining of them. That's why we can't preserve things.

>>102202822
>>102202853
personal opinion/10
The difference for the women is your personal preference on how much photoshop you like in the images you are viewing.

If you want to start throwing actual issues out bring up handbag placement, hand skin age, room composition (people don't take photos right in front of doors or besides weird matresses), bad door knobs and accessories, adding defects for defects such as that notch in the door for flux

File: ComfyUI_temp_jbgux_00166_.png (2.35 MB, 1120x1600)

2.35 MB PNG

>>102202853
same face also, they replaced poop with shit

16gb VRAM should I be using dev-fp8 or dev-Q8

>>102202973
always Q8, it's the cloest to fp16 in quality

File: 2024-09-02_00425_.png (1.5 MB, 832x1216)

1.5 MB PNG

>>102202897
more pillows

File: 00068-74149081.png (815 KB, 688x888)

815 KB PNG

https://youtu.be/x_7viigor4Y?si=jwr0ulgloL0AKJGQ

>>102202973
The ggufs are proper quantizations into lower bit weights, the fp8 is a much rougher approach and I would say it's largely obsolete at this point.

>>102203000
more like barely disguised fetish

File: ComfyUI_temp_ojdnc_00011_.png (3.1 MB, 1360x1600)

3.1 MB PNG

>>102202965
whatever, I'm just commenting on details that I perceive, you can do your prompt positioning tests that no one cares about

>>102202980
you can't use --fast with FP8 and using loras still slows down generation tremendously with more than one lora active

File: Part4.png (1.3 MB, 1024x1024)

1.3 MB PNG

>>102202925
Huh? That would break the "she's moving and this pic is at a later time" part of the illusion. My mind perceives this as a video.
>>102202289 (1)
>>102202680 (2)
>>102202897 (3)
<-(4)

>>102203057
--fast degrades the quality a bit, and because fp8 has worse quality than Q8 it really is a bad deal imo (even though yeah I agree with you, it's painfully slow to associate GGUF quants with loras)

File: Flux-20240811_172942-gen-(...).png (1.05 MB, 896x1152)

1.05 MB PNG

>>102202965
the door, one of SDXLs countless natural enemies. not that that matters much for flux because everything is a fucking blur
>>102203062
you are weird.

>>102203055
Those toes! Must have hurt

>>102202980
>>102203035
All right, thanks

File: ComfyUI_temp_xiuvx_00013_.png (2.02 MB, 1088x1280)

2.02 MB PNG

>>102203096
for me, its the fungus on the sole lol, I didn't even prompt that

File: Part5.png (1.25 MB, 1024x1024)

1.25 MB PNG

>>102203028
I'm not good enough at adding pillows.
>>102202289 (1)
>>102202680 (2)
>>102202897 (3)
>>102203062 (4)
<-(5)

>>102203000
This. Can get much better results out of realism LoRA.

>>102203000
Please understand, every "attractive" person in Korea is manufactured by cosmetic surgeons to look the same so they think sameface = good.

where are the good posters today?

>>102201782
Looks like a shitty smartphone beauty filter.

Any reason adetailer works with Flux but controlnet doesn't?

>>102203283
Isn't adetailer just an automated form of inpainting?

>>102203226
why u no like my pristine gens bro
>>102203283
why does your dog like apples but not walnuts? it's complicated.

>>102203300
my dog is died

File: End.png (1.47 MB, 1024x1024)

1.47 MB PNG

>>102203146
And when you fill everything with pillows, it zooms in, and you get fewer pillows.

>>102203309
>my dog is died
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYahPVL3FL0

>>102203055
so you are posting on a forum and you don't want to discuss things. In that case could you take your shit to your personal blog.

>>102203090
>one of SDXLs countless natural enemies
I am kinda surprised somebody hasn't made a checklist. When I am touching up images I usually miss one of them.

>not that that matters much for flux because everything is a fucking blur
is that more accurate? I would say kinda given phone photos are much more common than dedicated cameras.

>>102203292
yup. Segmentation + i2i

>>102203226
The caniball lollipops were too much for them.

https://github.com/city96/ComfyUI-GGUF/pull/92

This makes the image generated blurry

File: 00072-1016200345.png (660 KB, 616x808)

660 KB PNG

>>102203395
would you sub to d-flow'd magazine? it has nice articles

>>102203420
I didn't get that bug

>They made a finetune for portraits
>They called it WPortrait
>People try to make things with it that are not portraits
>They are surprised it sucks for them.

>>102203395
I am disappointed you think debo touches up images. I'll say that would be a attitude and skill issue for you then.

>>102203420

            if arch_str is None and (tensor_name.endswith(".proj_in.weight") or tensor_name.endswith(".proj_out.weight")):
                # Workaround for stable-diffusion.cpp SDXL detection.
                # Impossible to land here for our own GGUF files as we set architecture.
                while len(shape) > 2 and shape[-1] == 1:
                    shape = shape[:-1]

Fucking hell.

File: delux_hh_00050_.png (1.82 MB, 1024x1344)

1.82 MB PNG

>>102203439
I think he didn't care much for the magazine (even though it was free)

>>102203449
>another meme merge that could have been a lora instead
flux is a very easy model to notice degradation. the grifters are going to have a harder time.

>>102203449
two things:
>it's not better at portraits
>you don't need to tune an entire model for that anyway

>>102203337
the checklist is pretty short: "everything", minus faces. but definitely teeth. omg the teeth (ok thats a vae resolution issue)

>>102203465
this, and that's a good thing, will be easier to filter out the talentless hacks, they had their minute of fame on SD models, but now it's over

>>102203449
more like an overfitted model that muted everything else making it useless

>>102203420
>>102203446
>>102203454
First image worked fine, next image was distorted

>>102203395
I don't think debo touches up images kwab

>>102203465
kek, its true, every "finetune" that i've tried is just a shitty lora merge that ruins the model, kudos to black labs for making it harder to grifters

>>102200955
Lovely!

>>102203454
>gets upset over illy's code comments
>makes his own similar comments
Classic.

File: Flux-20240811_013713-gen-(...).png (976 KB, 1344x768)

976 KB PNG

>>102203483
right now all I want is a severe degradation of that fucking cleft chin into nothingness

>>102203449
>turn a 12B model into a portrait maker

>>102203559
>b-but he was making fun of me, reeeeee

File: notpepe.png (673 KB, 1024x1024)

673 KB PNG

I want to draw a Pepe without Loras, it just ignores the part with the red lips.
>This image is a digital drawing in a cartoon style, featuring a cute, anthropomorphic green frog. The frog is sitting cross-legged on a white background, with a large, pink spiral lollipop. The frog's large, round eyes are expressive and have a glossy, shiny appearance, giving it a playful and endearing look. Its cheeks are adorned with small, pink blush marks, adding to its adorable charm. The frog's skin is smooth and has a glossy texture, with subtle white spots on its back and a lighter green belly. The frog's mouth has thick, red lips. The lollipop is held vertically, and it has a bright pink spiral pattern with a white center. The lollipop's stem is thin and white. The frog is sitting on a fluffy white cloud, which adds to the whimsical and dreamy atmosphere of the image. In the background, there is a large, colorful rainbow arching behind the frog, spanning from the top of the image to the bottom. The rainbow has a gradient of pastel colors including pink, blue, yellow, and teal, and it is set against a white background, making the colors pop. The overall style is playful and vibrant, suitable for a children's book or a fun.

>>102203559
well that isn't great so I highlighted it.

It was to highlight that python handles instantiation like that poorly. You are copying your entire shape object minus one over and over. Inefficient AF. I haven't reviewed the entire code I am just guessing that shape is one of those big things with lots of data. It could be the entire model + lora. I can't name anything small it could be though....maybe a controlnet? Why don't you educate me?

File: file.png (3.25 MB, 2818x1570)

3.25 MB PNG

>>102203614
Got the red lips on cfg 6 but yeah, that's not even close to pepe

>>102203559
>>102203631
It's from this PR, that shouldn't be triggered for flux as far as I can tell.
https://github.com/city96/ComfyUI-GGUF/pull/80

File: file.png (2.6 MB, 1024x1024)

2.6 MB PNG

It's a dalle3 gen, can we replicate the same on flux?

>>102203454
>>102203446
I'm using unet loader gguf and power lora loader with a flux merge

how does the flux dual encoder work?
could you feed the loose tags part of the prompt (i.e. styles) to the clip part separately so you can still use tag weights?

>>102203750
n64 flux lora can probably do it

>>102203631
It's difference in model arch, linear vs conv 1x1, it is inefficient it only needs shape[:2]

>>102203778
The text encode?

>>102203710
it is hack to get something in XL working. I was offended as a coder. I tagged the post because I wouldn't have looked over the commit otherwise.

>>102203760
you are totally fine with flux. Sorry for the confusion.

>>102203796
It does not work with flux, second image generated is blurry

File: file.png (2.25 MB, 1024x1024)

2.25 MB PNG

>>102203750
excuuuuuuuse me princess!

File: fpa-pep.jpg (184 KB, 1024x1024)

184 KB JPG

>>102203671
i got an offbrand pepe with fluxpro.art

>>102203750
https://civitai.com/models/660136/flux64-n64-and-ps1-game-screenshot-lora

>>102203792
thanks. That is interesting.

>>102203808
I meant the issue I posted isn't flux related. Your shit can totally screwed from the update.

>>102203796
>it is hack to get something in XL working. I was offended as a coder. I tagged the post because I wouldn't have looked over the commit otherwise.
I think the model detection in comfy gets fucked without that due to the shape being off but I honestly haven't tested with SDXL since I think quantizing it is pointless.
>>102203808
Only difference being the seed or are you changing LoRA weights/etc?

File: 2024-09-02_00436_.png (1012 KB, 832x1216)

1012 KB PNG

>>102203750
who knows.. who knows...

>>102203860
Only seed is changed

>>102203859
His comment should have explained it instead of shitting on some other repo

File: what do you mean.png (1.02 MB, 911x1024)

1.02 MB PNG

>>102203671

>>102203897
kek

>>102203897
both are racist and sexist symbols of hate ofc

>>102203883
have you tried restarting (comfy) and then dragging in the workflow with the new seed? I have had too many comfy caching "something" issues.

The bread is ready...
>>102203927
>>102203927
>>102203927

>>102203836
Oh yeah, what was your prompt? That's what I was looking for, the problem with the pepe Lora is that it's the same pepe in all of them, you don't get variety, offbrand pepe solves that.

>>102203936
just copy the wiki article and put meme

>>102203889
at least it wasn't a PR for attribution ;)

>>102203924
Yes, I'll try it with another lora

>>102203889
>>102203993
Low effort bait, that comment was added in the PR linked here >>102203710

File: file.png (2 MB, 1024x1024)

2 MB PNG

>>102203897

>>102203994
>>102203924
If I keep the lora and prompt I get this but image is fine

got prompt
Unloading models for lowram load.
0 models unloaded.

Changing prompt

got prompt
Requested to load FluxClipModel_
Loading 1 new model

Image is fine

It works now

>>102201150
is your lora for this still private? i really like the style

>>102202134
Thanks i will not be using AWportrait