Post language you hate ITT and explain why
кeк
I hate Rust because it's now used for a bunch of projects that would have been written in Python if it was 2014 but now they're in this unreadable mess for literally no sane reason. I'm taking about shit like libraries doing stuff on the level of turning on a fucking IOT botnet lightbulb by sending http requests.
>>102406233
>>102406314proof lua>js?
>>102406233I'm going to be contrarian and say that this is exactly how this should work (in javascript at least). There is no situation in which you should ever be comparing an integer and a string representation of an integer unless you want to implicitly cast.
>>102406667t. average programmer joe
>another thread where /g/tards are too dumb to use ===
>>102406233>convenience is bad!OK, neet
t. unemployed no-coders discuss programming languages
0 == "0" ==> nullThis was easy.
>>102406667shut up faggot, u should use the real programming language
>>102406203>be OP, primus homosexuales>posts a language he hates>does not explain why
>>102406203Might makes right
>>102408286that's a man.
>>102406233Same thing with SQL and php
>>102408522you wouldnt say that to his face
>>102408122This is usually the case, yes.
>>102406203I like Javascript.It's a good and flexible scripting language.And it's certainly comfier than LUA, as a scripting language.I hate people who write Java for Javascript, and misuse it to make the world worse.
>>102406203>async garbage that makes your workflow hell>ackshually javascript is good if you download bloat to fix the native behaviorbin it already
>>102406233you're supposed to use this
>>102406667>>102407702>>102410208>types don't exist>except that they do>and sometimes you need to check them by using typeof>which gives you a string which you need to compare>even though strings are a type, and those dont exist>even though they clearly do, because that's literally how computers work>so all this abstraction just hides the very clearly existing types, and you still need to know them and check them all the time despite them "not existing"fuck you and your retarded pajeet toy memelang. jeetscript has literally 0 valid use cases.the same way Dijkstra said that BASIC-programmers were forever mentally mutilated in a way that prevents them from ever being good programmers, is exactly what javascript does to modern coders.
>>102411634>the same way Dijkstra said that BASIC-programmers were forever mentally mutilated in a way that prevents them from ever being good programmers, is exactly what javascript does to modern coders.C is worse.
>DOOD JUST COMPILE 500 DEPS FOR A HELLO WORLD
>>102411634Nobody ever claimed that types don't exist in JS or that you shouldn't know them. Cope harder.
>>102408286Average Rust developer. Fucking kek.
>>102411752>classes are objects>except that they're actually functions>because the constructor is a function, and that's the actual class>except that there is a class object, that implicitly becomes the "this" keywordyour language is made for literal crayon-devouring retards. you know that, right?
>>102411807It's still by far the best language out there. Your non-arguments don't change the fact.
>>102411807Class is just syntactic sugar over prototypes and functions are subsets of objects. This is not a class object, its also syntactic sugar.
>>102410208>>102411634The idea that is ok to have multiple equals operators comes from lisp. Just look at common lisp: eq, eql, equal, equalp.
>>102411807I still kek how the class keyword defined class constructors force you to use the useless new operator.
>>102412180>ignoring the arguments make them non-argumentsyou are a retard>>102412251>syntactic sugar>by making it more convoluted and dumbagain -- js "devs" are irreversibly damaged and can never recover.
>>102412684What argument?
>>102412251>Class is just syntactic sugarI don't think this is actually True. I have to brush up on my spec-fu, but I think extends and forced new operator use breaks with classical prototypal OO javascript had pre ES6. You can replicate it (to a point) but I don't think it's purely 1 for 1.
>>102408202OP is a fag as usualdoesn't practice what he preaches
>>102406203SQL, statements are made to be similar to natural language. At the end of day it's mess without any logic and consistency
>query language>complains about syntax
