/g/ - KDE Neon Core - Technology

Anonymous

KDE Neon Core 09/16/24(Mon)19:04:28 No.102418286

File: snapshot.jpg (359 KB, 1920x1080)

KDE Neon Core Anonymous 09/16/24(Mon)19:04:28 No.102418286 Archived

>Ubuntu Core is a version of Ubuntu that's comprised entirely of snaps, with even the Linux kernel being a snap.
>KDE wants to make a version of Ubuntu Core that runs KDE: KDE Neon Core
Can your flathacks do this?

Anonymous
09/16/24(Mon)19:05:47 No.102418299

Anonymous 09/16/24(Mon)19:05:47 No.102418299

what a bunch of cancer

Anonymous
09/16/24(Mon)19:08:32 No.102418322

Anonymous 09/16/24(Mon)19:08:32 No.102418322

File: ExTGzGDUYAU4_3B.jpg (20 KB, 500x344)

20 KB JPG

>>102418286
Ubuntu more like deluluntu, amirite? The hell is mark smoking o_0

Anonymous
09/16/24(Mon)19:09:48 No.102418333

Anonymous 09/16/24(Mon)19:09:48 No.102418333

>>102418299
>what a bunch of c- *CRASHES*
Oh no, I guess your hecking package manager updated lib.ussy.so from version 2.2.3.7 to 2.2.4.0 and that broke your system. Oopsie.

Anonymous
09/16/24(Mon)19:29:34 No.102418532

Anonymous 09/16/24(Mon)19:29:34 No.102418532

>>102418286
>>102418299
>>102418322
Why do we hate snaps again? They just work.

Anonymous
09/16/24(Mon)20:13:34 No.102418908

Anonymous 09/16/24(Mon)20:13:34 No.102418908

>>102418532
Snaps predate Flatpack by a lot, it's flatpacks which are inferior not invented here cope from redhate.

Anonymous
09/16/24(Mon)20:17:18 No.102418947

Anonymous 09/16/24(Mon)20:17:18 No.102418947

>>102418532
deluluntufags are next level mentally challenged

Anonymous
09/16/24(Mon)20:28:10 No.102419052

Anonymous 09/16/24(Mon)20:28:10 No.102419052

>>102418908
lol. flatpacks are just dockers for gtk/qt desktop programs

Anonymous
09/16/24(Mon)20:35:36 No.102419128

Anonymous 09/16/24(Mon)20:35:36 No.102419128

File: 1726533303313.png (214 KB, 1037x1011)

214 KB PNG

>>102418532
Proprietary backend

Anonymous
09/16/24(Mon)20:45:47 No.102419190

Anonymous 09/16/24(Mon)20:45:47 No.102419190

>>102418947
Not an argument.
>>102419128
A fair argument.

Anonymous
09/16/24(Mon)20:52:01 No.102419233

Anonymous 09/16/24(Mon)20:52:01 No.102419233

>>102419052
You have it backwards shill. Snaps are containerized. Flatpak is its own beast. The anon you are replying to is 100% correct.

Anonymous
09/16/24(Mon)23:45:56 No.102420659

Anonymous 09/16/24(Mon)23:45:56 No.102420659

File: ublueguy.png (136 KB, 344x344)

136 KB PNG

>>102418286
>boots docker images from your grub file
Nothing personnel ubuntards

Anonymous
09/16/24(Mon)23:58:53 No.102420773

Anonymous 09/16/24(Mon)23:58:53 No.102420773

>>102418286
fuck all that trash just give me a deb or a pacman package.

Anonymous
09/17/24(Tue)04:54:24 No.102422821

Anonymous 09/17/24(Tue)04:54:24 No.102422821

Neat. I always thought Ubuntu Core is a better approach to immutable/atomic desktops than OpenSUSE MicroOS or Fedora Atomic.

Anonymous
09/17/24(Tue)05:24:56 No.102422986

Anonymous 09/17/24(Tue)05:24:56 No.102422986

>>102419128
Proprietary backend doesn't prevent Snap from being Free Software.

Stallman has been clear about this: only the software that runs on your machine must be free. But if the backend of the service is proprietary that's not an issue since that doesn't run on your machine.