>2600k of storageLiterally no reason to use NVME or HDD
>>102451157>Literally no reason to use NVMEYeah...no.NVME is actually a lot faster. They're pretty cheap now too, no reason not to spend $30-$50 for your OS drive.
>>102451157The final redpill of computing.(You) do not NEED anything more than what the SATA interface can provide.
>>102451173I wonder why some people just say stupid shit like that, it is a bad troll or they really believe it like a moron?You could say you don't need better tech than a floppy drive but only until you use the superior technology and you go back to the previous one you notice how much of a difference it make.Cold booting in like 3 seconds and software opening faster is fucking great
>>102451171>they are actually a lot fasterGood thing normal users don't copy 500GB every day.>>102451205Booting OS on 870 evo and Gen 5 NVME has almost no difference.
>>102451205cd had 500 times the memory of a floppy disknvme on other hand has the exact same amount of a regular sata ssdthe speed difference isn't noticeablebuy one nvme for your system and software keep the rest on sata ssdsimple
>>102451219>Booting OS on 870 evo and Gen 5 NVME has almost no difference.HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvZIdh57B9khttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQ7aF37YFvw
>>102451262>two completely different systems with completely different monitors with completely different wake-up times>no login screen on #2wow dude you sure showed him epicly!!
>>102451157you don't need the extra speed of NVME until you do
>bootingwhat is this, 2005?
>>102451313lmao, sure you can just post your pc booting your own 870 on sata, right?https://www.youtube.com/shorts/n48yRpwaIoI
we already have a thread about broke losers crying that they can't afford nvme drives >102439305do we really need two
>>102451205tbf, unless you're constantly moving massive files between drives, you'll never realistically need more than what sata6 can provide.
>>102451380if this were true boomers wouldn't have invented raid to cope with how dogshit slow sata drives were
>>102451380Its like, you literally didn't read anything I posted.Its the small, faster time of everyday action that make it worth it. You open a browser? Fast. You click a url? Fast. You open a software? Fast. You copy some files around regardless of size? Fast. You open and close files? Fast.ONLY when you use the old sata pc you notice how slower everyhing was in everything, not just copying files.But of course, people who don't use nve drives daily wouldn't know
>>102451157but my laptop has 2 (3 with wifi) name slots and no sata
>>102451620*nvmealso nvme is faster than sata
>>102451219Anon don't cope because you own old and outdated things, there's absolutely a difference between the two while booting. Just spend $150 and get one kek.
>>102451171>NVME is actually a lot faster.Which most users won't notice.
>>102451436Random access time is so much higher on NVME compared to SATA this is the main benefit. This is why you everything feels so much snappier. I had the same experience coming from my 870 evo to a 990 pro.
cope i guess idk. If you don't want to copy files and shit
11.3 seconds from pressing on a button to desktop. Fuck you, pathetic larping nvme cuckolds.
>>102451700>>102451262At most 2 second difference
>>102451157that's not a 850 doe?
>>102451157>no reason to use NVMEIf you ever get a serious job, you will quickly realise that sata speeds are not enough in 2024.
>>102451157I got a SATA SSD because I couldn't be fucked removing my graphics card to access the M.2 slot.
>>102452194>11.3 secondsit do be like that if you use a hobo tier featureless a610 or a620 board
>he didn't disable the fast boot slop in bios
>>102451157>2600k of storage2.6 megabytes isn't a lot
