Firebrothers, we won.
bloat. group tabs by window
>>102475417Just use Sidebery, there is no point waiting for Mozilla.
Tabbers are ruining web browsers because they are too ignorant to use bookmarks. There is no need tens and tens of tabs of bullshit.
Already exists and is superior
>>102475417Edge has had this for almost two years
>>102475417>*firesisters (previously brothers)dont forget you transitioned from chromium to firefox xister
>>102475417Are they collapsable? It was the one feature I missed from Chrome when I Transitioned in 2022.
>>102475417How long until they implement browsing speed?
>>102475929as soon as they replace Gecko with Chromium and stop falling for the caltrops Google™ AdSense™ throws in front of it.
>>102475417I just use OneTab and stash a ton of tabs there.Now when the fuck are they going to allow you to mute all tabs on open by default? Chromium has this and I miss it dearly.
>>102475929Firefox is plenty fast. Take your pills.
>>102476105>Firefox is plenty fastThe amount of lies faggots and trannies will spout with a straight face needs to be studied. The lying leftist kike never for one minute considers being honest
>>102476068>instead of using bookmarks, use bookmarks (OneTab)am I missing something?
>>102476124Every modern browser is blazing fast. Do you remember what things used to be like?
>>102476169I'm comparing it to Chromium and Safari. Not to Netscape and Internet Explorer that ceased existing ages ago. Mozilla has completely stunted firefox's growth and made it clunky, bloated, slow and unstable as fuck. The entire browser feels like it's held together by tape, using ui elements, opening new tabs, rendering images or animated media, everything feels fucking terrible compared to chromium. It's like 60hz vs 120hz
>>102476148Bookmarks to me are for permanent sites while OneTab is for shit I'm going to use once and then delete afterward, I just don't know when I'm going to use it.
>>102476196But it's not clunky bloated or slow compared to how things used to be. I guess it makes sense to compare it to its contemporary competition but they all feel fast to me and I'm fine with using a fast browser instead of a fast+ browser if it's produced ethically and I'm free to do as I please with it. No way to theme Chrome to match GTK4. Manifest V3. Proprietary shit, integration with Google services. Yuck.
>>102476243There are chromium forks that are fully FOSS and have everything connected to google stripped out of them, for example Ungoogled Chromium. Not sure about GTK4 theme as I don't use that. But you do you, it's just way too clunky and slow for me and I wish mozilla could put some actual effort into that instead of pretending that it's somehow faster in specific benchmarks doing shit nobody does in browsers and avoiding the issue.
>>102476243OP is just a faggot on a trash system and oddly simps for google.
>>102475903Yes.
>>102475417> uses bing.BTFO toddler. NGMI
>>102475417Usecase?
I have never used tan groups because they seemed like useless gimmick. Was I just filtered by technology and tab groups are actually based?
>>102477958They only make sense with vertical tabs really.
>>102475417Finally! I've been thinking of that today. Hopefully I'll see it in LibreWolf soon.>>102475466'tard
>>102475547>Tabbers are ruining web browsers because they are too ignorant to use bookmarks.Different uses.
>>102475417>FirefoxWhat an absolute dumpster fire of a browser
>>102475417Firefox has had tab groups since 2002. It's called the Bookmarks menu.
