[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1710429476641939.gif (89 KB, 1024x768)
89 KB
89 KB GIF
Is the internet an example of a biological software system? Alan Kay seems to strongly imply it in the talk "The Computer Revolution Hasn't Happened Yet": https://youtu.be/oKg1hTOQXoY?t=2749
Why is there not more software that is designed in such a way? By that I mean as a system made up of smaller components connected to each other that is alive in the sense that the components can be added, modified, removed without the system ever going down similar to how a biological organism works.
Is it really because instead of objects the world decided to mainly use data to represent reality?
>>
File: fred.jpg (6 KB, 211x239)
6 KB
6 KB JPG
>Is the internet an example of a biological software system?
>>
>>102475947
>why is there not more software that is designed in such a way?
Google "distributed systems"

Tor network, torrents, container orchestration, distributed dbs, email, WWW, etc., there is a shit ton of such software



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.