Why do you keep generating csam, anon?
can you at least post the article link
>>102772393no
remove yourself
>>102772453meant to reply to>>102772403
fuk doccy gon do?
>>102772386If this is in regards to (((adversarial))) usage of text-based LLMs, I am only generating erotic sexual stories which abuse no one and occasionally involve fictional minors. Text will never be CSAM, and I will never use these models for creating the sanitized corposlop they're intended for.
>>102772386> no link> no sourcefantastic. it's another one of those "things that never happened" thread created by people who have extensive convictions for raping minors.
>>102772386>>102772393>>102773330since OP is retarded nigger:https://arxiv.org/html/2406.13843v2
I didn't know I was supposed to be doing all those things, what's NCII?
STAND BACK OR I'LL PUSH THE BUTTON.
> gen AI> CSAMWho's getting abused?
>>102774157The investors.
>>102774020non consentual intimate images. eg: prompting pics of you and your niece.
>>102774000>read the paper>follow the citation>see this
>>102775842damn, what are the chink child bikini models supposed to do now that their job has been outsourced to AI?
>>102772386how does an ai abuse children?? dafuq
>Why do you keep generating csam, anon?Because why not?