>no thumbnails in file picker
>>102958462stop recommending this dogshit distro and use arch + dwm
>>102958488dwm is hard to configure
>>102958496no it’s not. also not an issue even if it is ( it isn’t) because it has sane defaults
>>102958488>stop recommending this dogshit distro and use another dogshit distro with a window manager for tinker trannies
>>102958535okI prefer openboxed xfce
I have used Linux Mint for so long that I hardly miss this 'feature' any more.
>>102958462Wydm? Im using it and it seems to have what you’re saying unless I misunderstood.>>102958488You’re the exact faggot that tells everyone to use Arch, then when newbies ask questions, you sperg out saying RTFD and complain to them about needing to be spoonfed.>>102958496Arch is for autists with too much free time, I genuinely don’t know anyone who actually uses it as a daily driver AND has a job. The customisation is cool but fuck the constant uphill battle to get shit to work. Just use Mint and you get all the same benefits of Arch without your balls being in a metaphorical vice
>>102958584you don't need to configure anything on arch for basic web browser/gaming/editing use
>>102958462you have to generate thumbnails first by viewing them in nautilus once.
>>102958584>Arch is for autists with too much free time,Yeah software engineers personally just stick with Ubuntu and Fedora as they value their time.
>>102958610>uses his OS without SELinux or AppArmor configured typical brainlet archie
Use the file manager to chose the file then copy paste.
>>102958873that's illegal
>>102958462I find it useless feature, i would rather see "Details pane" from Win7 implemented but it seems to be too difficult for modern linux devs to develop, they are too obsessed with webshit.
>>102958462Use KDE.There, problem solved.
>>102958462use case?
>>102959283*krashes*
