>anything that is not indexed we will call the "deep web" to make it sound spookylmao
>incomplete graphwhy did you delete the deepest level, mirandas web, from the picture?
>>103226221I'd be more inclined to say that unindexed databases consist of 99% of the web
>>103226221>96%it's true, the deep web is massive, but implying that the dark web is a visible chunk compared to the deep web is a straigth up lie
>>103226299I mean, that's the whole point of the iceberg analogy.
>>103226221>other illegal activities
>>103226356it lumps the "dark web" together with them, and while it isn't inaccurate it's extremely misleading
>>103226338Yes exactly, I'm not saying the deep web isn't massive but saying the dark web is equal in size to it is a fucking lie
>>103226906>saying the dark web is equal in size to it is a fucking lieThe graphic doesn't say that the deep web is equal in size with the dark web. It only says that they both make 96% of the web content.
>>103227581everything about the graph is making you thing that it isif it really was an informative graph it would indicate the real %percentage of the dark web>inb4 it was too hard
>>103227618>everything about the graph is making you thing that it isThe Surface Web row size in the graph is the same size as the Deep Web row and the Dark Web. While the graph shows that the Surface Web is only 4% of the total. It's quite obvious to anyone to understand the rows size are not linked to the size of the web content described in it.>if it really was an informative graph it would indicate the real %percentageI agree it would be better.Also I don't like that the dark web is always so strongly linked with illegal activities, as if the surface web wasn't full of illegal activities.
>>103226221>political protesti like the implication that people are stupid enough to believe that protests nowadays aren't sanctioned by the government and corporations
>>103226221It's not 2012 anymore, newfag.
>>103226264>Marianas Webdoesn't exist. It's stupid that stupids pass off to other stupids in hopes that one day it'll be believed
>>103226221So torrent sites are deep web now? If so then yeah it makes sense
at least post the full one
>>103226221Dark web and deep web refer to the same thing: sites not indexed by search engines. Nothing more, nothing less. Stop trying to romanticize the concept into some spoopy 2kool4skoll nega-internet.
>>103226338They're the same thing.
>>103226264someone post that chart with quantum computers being required for the deep web and shit
>>103228462>unix nirvanamade me laugh
caimeo
>>103228462Home
>>103228486Quantum computers don't exist.
google doesn’t even surface most of the shit it has crawled now, right? only fresh pages, because anything that was written more than a year ago is obviously worthless
This one is more accurate
>>103231202Oh this is the snippet of the chart that I was searching for >>103228486I actually managed to find the full version now
>>103228464retard
>>103232141They're exactly the same fucking thing, dark web and deep web.
