>>103232279I've been using it full-time for several months now. It's terrific. I refuse to go back.
>>103232284My brain is fried from furry pornography, can you spoonfeed me on why it's so terrific?
it's pretty good but not good enough to make me switch from safari
>>103232301> safarithis is bait right?when i used it (10 years ago to be fair) it was ass
>>103232383nope not bait. it has gotten really good
>>103232279Jeet grift
its just a browser
>>103232279>>103232284>>103232289>>103232383>>103232301>casually sends back every link you ever click on back to the company together with a unique identifier>so badly programmed that a rando could crawl anyones browsing history and get their uuid stored on Arcs serverBut of course that was just a """""bug""""" and of course has been """"disabled"""" in the close source product.
>>103232420Okay this is the kind of indepth knowledge I came here to see. That sounds pretty damning. What browser do you use?
>>103232437Firefox. It doesnt matter what g says (actually always do the opposite of what g says). Firefox and Chromium are both open source and provide the lowest amount of entropy contrary to the bazillion forks.
buy an ad
>>103232420safari is more private than any other browser except tor. they all get fucked by fingerprint tests.
>>103232279Retarded UI, not only takes horizontal but also vertical space.
>>103232482Firefox gets fingerprinted because the default config is made for speed on different hardware. If you enable the appropriate config settings (which is what Tor does) Firefox is by far the hardest to fingerprint.Safari is a lot easier to fingerprint (see Gnome Web which is just a Gtk Gui over Apples Webkit). Its just that the hardware being the same between versions what makes fingerprinting hard on macos. Webkit doesnt even have features like letterboxing or font faking.
>>103232482You do realize that Tor is nothing more than Firefox with a couple of config flags changed?
>>103232513wrong. firefox does not bypass fingerprint as nearly as good as safari. not even librewolf. try https://abrahamjuliot.github.io/creepjs/>>103232517i am aware
>>103232497OP here fwiw I agree with this
>>1032322790 privacy hardening capabilities. 0
>>103232518>>103232513>Macos has same hardware so fingerprinting is virtually impossible>Acknowledges that Tor is Firefox with a couple of config flags changeI know creepjs. Firefox passes it everytime if you enable the Tor configs. No other browser does (even Safari doesnt). Webkit (ie Safari) has no letterboxing nor font faking nor client size media query protection firefox has all of this.
>>103232518safari does not pass creepjs you shit are you one of these idiots who dont understand how the test works no browser passes creepjs outside of firefox with user.js and firefox forks enabling the tor user.js
>>103232564>>103232599i can open different tabs of creepjs on safari and each will have a different fingerprint. it can even change your ip address in every tab.
>>103232604You are so unbelivably stupid my friend its unreal. Just keep using Safari. Maybe you should switch to Arc to be even more private.
>>103232631how am i stupid what i said is real
>>103232279>Closed-source browserNice try, shlomo.
>>103232631>>103232636Yeah guys if you have a point, let's actually explain it and give each other the benefit of the doubt before namecalling. We can do better.
>>103232279Gay bullshit made by a bunch of retarded grifters.
>>103232279I am currently content with Brave. What is Arc's use case?
zen is based on firefox and open source
>>103232279>>103232284>>103232289>>103232383>>103232526>>103232631>>103233558>>103233608BUY. AN. AD.
>>103233608how does it compare to arc
>>103233660>BUY. 4CHAN. GOLD.you have millions of words to tell shills to fuck off and you had to pick the most reddit onesshut the fuck up you cuck
>>103232668
>>103232479see >>103234016
>>103232518>wrong.
>>103233938Who the fuck knows.
>>103232279Can't even import bookmarks without importing them from another installed browser
>>103232279>Arc is the Chrome replacement I've been waiting forArc is another Chrome reskin.>>103233608How do you add folders and big buttons to the left panel ? >>103234052>import bookmarks without importing them from another installed browserduh
>>103235062Wdym duh? If I did a clean install I shouldn't have to setup another browser first just for Arc to then import them from said browser - no other browser doesn't let you import bookmarks from a file
>>103232279windows version is an absolute disasterbut i'm stuck with it until zen implements bookmarks like arc
>>103235077I don't have that problem. Zen and Firefox synchronize stuff with one another, and if I ever need it I can export bookmarks to json.
>>103235062>How do you add folders and big buttons to the left panel ?sorry its just a concept posted by zen twitter
>>103232279https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QINoB1_OXUk
>Chrome replacement>Chromium basedNot replacing chrome
used it for a few months but ultimately switched back to chrome since i didnt really see a real usp
>>103233608what a waste of space just use normal tabs
>>103232279>yet another reskinned chrome
>>103233660When did this cuck meme become so common? Has Hiro really brainwashed all of you to shill his shit ads nobody buys?
>>103235654normal tabs ARE a waste of space. what do you need all that horizontal space to the sides for?
>>103236130looking at spreadsheets
>>103232279I don't have any. I just use Firefox. I have no reason to switch.
>>103232279trying to reinvent the wheel but it's just a mess
You are unable to export bookmarks from Arc.
>Chrome replacement >Chromium
>>103232452/g/ thinks you should NOT hang yourself by the neck until dead.