[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Why is windows so much faster on intel CPUs?
>>
it isnt
>>
File: 1726442539699466.jpg (98 KB, 600x526)
98 KB
98 KB JPG
newest versions of win are made and tested with latest intel cpus, has been like that since forever.
>>
>>103233903
>wangblows
>jewtel
gee man idk kikes and indians are friends apparently
>>
>>103234157
Wow dude
>>
>>103233903
because AMD uses glued together CPUs and their marketing has convinced gaymers that this latency can be overcome with enormous cache *in certain gaming benchmarks* but overall performance suffers. A perfect example of this is how much better perfomance you get when using AMD APUs. Of cource im referring to non-gaming benchmarks. Though what they can do in gaming is impressive. Monolithic die CPUs are more difficult to design and yields tend to be lower
>>
>>103233903
Because the CIA and NSA asked for it to be so
>>
>>103233903
Intel is superior because it is built in America. AMD is chinknshit built in asia
>>
File: unnamed.jpg (52 KB, 459x512)
52 KB
52 KB JPG
>>103233903
>>
>>103233903
Probably take advantage of the ecores and makes sure to run the NSA keylogger on a low power thread so you keep your pcores for gaymen.
>>
Because the AMDip is real
>>
>>103233903
windows would be 3x faster if it ran on apple silicon
>>
File: IMG_6108.jpg (320 KB, 750x479)
320 KB
320 KB JPG
>>103234322
>glued togwther CPUs
>>103235134
>Because the AMDip is real
it is really this. plus the I/O Die is still 12nm and made by Global Foundaries.
Frequency will always be king.
on /o/ we say “no replacement for displacement” in reference to engine performance.
AMD can use gimmicks to minimize the negative physica of infinity cache. But they cant eliminate it enirely except with their APUs using monolithic dies.
Monolithic dies will always be king of all-round performance. glued on cous with glued on cache can overcome these limitations for certain cache-heavy workloads.
>>
>>103233903
I'm going to buy a ryzen 8845hs mini-pc
should i go for core ultra 155h then?
I think intel is better for general computing, but my main priority is gaming and i got the impression that amd has really good mobile ryzens for budget gaming.
>>
Botnettery
>>
>>103236990
well friend perhaps you should do a little research instead of just asking some randos on 4chins.
What has everyone been saying? is that an monolithic APU or is it a glued together CPU? Use your brain.
>>
>>103236897
>Global Foundaries
>>
File: IMG_6115.jpg (27 KB, 739x415)
27 KB
27 KB JPG
>>103238869
Global Foundaries is still around and still making those I/O dies in 12nm plus the A/B/X chipsets for the Mobos.
note how fucking huge that I/O die looks compared to the two Zen CCDs. thats because the i/O chip hasnt changed since Zen+
>>
>tfw intel does chiplet better than AMD in one generation.. they just need to stop being cheap and pay for SMT
kek
>>
>>103233905
Fpbp



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.