[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/g/ - Technology


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: 1718884818107448.png (155 B, 256x256)
155 B
155 B PNG
>he fell for the 1440p meme
>>
>>103235108
I use 1440p inside the VM that i am running on my native 4k system.
There are seriously people who run a resolution natively that i am using for a little window.
>>
1920x1200 for me
>>
>>103235260
Show me your upscale and whitespace ratio, I wanna laugh
>>
Anything above 1080p is a meme
>>
>>103236139
go take a shit on the street
>>
>>103236163
in the world of dlss/fsr and 350€ UHD 144Hz IPS monitors why would anyone use less than UHD?
>>
1080p is more than enought
>>
>>103236180
Size? They typically don’t make them less than 27 inches. Plus you also have to start upgrading your graphics card.
>>
i like it. i dont need 4k. i have several 4k televisions already with HDR
>>
1080p is the best bang for buck. There are severe diminishing returns after this. You can see proof of this in how slow uptake of higher resolutions has been. 1440p and 4k have been around for ages but most PC users still stick with 1080p. If it was so gamechanging they'd have switched faster. But no, it's stil happening at a snail's pace, even though it's become quite affordable. That speaks for itself. No one cares except severe autists
>>
>>103238517
2k at 120-240hz is comfy. I'll consider 4k for my next monitor perhaps, but I prefer frames over number of pixels.
>>
>>103237554
why upgrade the graphics card? Every modern game has upscaling from that looks pretty much like native res. And 1080p native for sure looks worse than 1080p upscaled to 2160p
>>
1600 x 900

my eyes!
>>
>>103235108
I went from 23" 1080p to 27" 1440p and everything looks exactly the same. All the text and icons are the same size as before, I just have more screen area now.
>>
>>103235108
I didn't fall for it, I'm still using a 1366x768 screen.
>>
1080p is fucking garbage. Thank god im not a coping poorfag
>>
>>103239557
what is your screen size? 27?
>>
>>103239178
This is what I did and it's great. For my 14" laptop I have 1080p and would need >100% scaling if it was any higher res than that.
>>
>>103239814
>14" laptop I have 1080p
im at 125%. no i am not blind, its just the most comfy to me.
>>
>>103239882
I tried this and it was cramped and some of my programs were blurry. Made me want to gouge my eyes out.
>>
I have 4k now but 2k is perfectly great balance between resolution, framerate, and price
>>
>>103239944
which ones? for me its usually only the windows prompts that look blurry
>>
>>103235108
>>he fell for the 1440p meme
How did you know? Seeing the individual pixels on a 27" annoys me. At 24" inches it would have been better.
>>
>>103235108
At 27" it's the sweet spot. This is a particularly strange cope, because you can literally go to the store and look at their display monitors to see the difference.
>>103239178
Well no shit, if you increase the screen size too then the pixel density isn't going to change as noticeably. Try comparing that to a 27" 1080p screen.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.