How can I cope with this? (16GBbro btw)
>>103236035What are people doing that makes their system page? I only have 16 GB because I found 2x4GB identical to what I had cheap on eBay. I don't think I've ever seen my usage go over 4 GB.
>>103236251Literally just firefox with many tabs
delete it. its an outdated technologyi dont recall what microtrooners state optimal, either x4 times size (which is about 16GB) or x(1/4) of the availableanyway, system "commits" more when theres more and less when theres less. some retro pops would say xp consumed/required less memory but it depends on memory cap, how much it "consumes". win7 on pic, eats 400MB for 2GB and about 1.2GB for 16GB
>>103237003Impossible to disable it, shit just crashes then. I ordered 32GB but I bet I'll still need this shit enabled even with that
>>103236035you can't
>>103237033You will i have 32gb, system barely uses 20% under strain but loves the pagefile so i turned it off to encourage ram use, bluescreened not long after. Still didn't use more ram.Windows is pretty retarded about this.
>>103237003Do not disable swap.I tried.I had 128GB ram.Many different programs go batshit crazy with their memory consumption when there is no swap.
>>103237003>xp consumed/required less memoryXP had terrible memory management compared to Vista.
