Computers hit their absolute peak once USB 3.0 dropped. Since then, there hasn't been a single development worth a shit.
I disagree.
>>103244147your thread is wrong and incorrect
>>103244147if we're just talking connectivity then thunderbolt really changed the game40gb/s throughput including possibly multiple monitors, USB devices and power delivery (or just plug in an external GPU)beats convenience of USB 3
>>103244147USB 3.0 dropped during windows 98?
>>103244270Ok. I know this isn't the place to ask this. But since you bring up thunderbolt with multiple monitors, peripherals, and power delivery. Will a single thunderbolt connection power my 2 1080p 165Hz monitors, while running several peripherals and powering my gaming laptop? I've had a hard time finding an answer to the running multiple monitors questions.
>>103244362>Thunderbolt supports higher bandwidth relative to DisplayPort in daisy chain, which allows for 4K@60Hz for two monitors, and up to six monitors at 1080p@60Hzcopied from BenQ website I think it still depends on host machine TB 3/4 and monitor specs generally speaking it should work, no idea about vrr or if response times are impacted by daisychaining
>>103244270my usb-c is doing multiple monitors fine enough, power delivery is also an optionalso >multiple monitors using thunderbolt when majority of M-chips laptops are artificially limited to 1 external monitor (or closed down lid fucking the temps up)apple at its finest>>103244147>peak>same shit but faster>shows picrel of that one connector that is not backwards compatible how about >m1, the first actually usable arm processor and rosseta2 to make x86 programs work well with it>usb-c, actually a good usb connectorfuck now when i think about it that's it, everything else is either same shit but faster or made worse on purpose
>>103244561USB-C is a connector, not the underlying protocol used to transmit dataif you wanted you could solder a custom connector that talks thunderbolt 3/4 if you keep to the spec (and pay royalties to jewtel)also fuck apple silicon, go read about gofetch and how it stole your performance as it's a security hole in the processor that had to be circumvented in Software
>>103244622by that logic>fuck intel, go read about spectre and meltdown and how it stole your performance as it's a security hole in the processor that had to be circumvented in Software>USB-C is a connector, not the underlying protocol used to transmit dataI know, and it's using USB to do that
Ban smartphones so computers can become good again
>>103244147it identifies as usb 3.1 gen 1 now you biggot
>>103245840Actually it's USB3.2 Gen1x1
>>103245873fuck you are correctanyway anyone related to the usb naming convention should be shot
>>103245894Why couldn't they just do like wifi and call it USB 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7for me it will always be 802.11ac, 802.11ax, ...
I never heard of "wifi N" until wifi 7 started being advertised.
USB 3.0 to SATA
>>103245921they started with wifi 6, then officially renamed 4 and 5. the previous gens are unofficially assumed to follow the sequence
>>103244147All data should be fiber. The power should be on 2OT cables so your power cords double as a personal protection device. It should then have a protective sleeve so it looks like a giant purple dildo. All data cables should be giant purple dildos.
>>103245921You didn't have wifi in 2010?
>>103248654Mate I still run cable to my router. Fuck, I'd run an ethernet cable to my phone if it was practical.
>>103244147>waiting for usb nvme sticks>brb
>>103244147It's nice to not need to worry about plugging in a USB-C cable the right way it's much more simpler that way
>>103244147>completely ignores nvme
