Is Yudkowsky right? Should the government monitor GPU usage to make sure nobody builds a dangerous AI superintelligence, just as you're not allowed to refine uranium or engineer deadly viruses?
We're going to have to stream everything in the future because of AI faggots.
>>103244313Yes
If there is precedent to say that such things are dangerous.
>>103244313Simply put, I trust my neighbour more than I do politicians, so I would rather my neighbour have nukes than Biden or Harris
Someone post it
>>103244313>Should the government monitorNo.
>>103244313No he is retarded in multiple ways at the same time.
>>103244313>libertarian cuck
>>103244430Have the Government supervise the development of artificial Superintelligence in a passive form, you cannot risk the degeneration of progression through intervention, especially in a strategic race to build such infrastructure and intelligence with china
>>103244313anyone planning on building a superintelligence should do it now before they start watching us alli'll make the logo
>>103244313Haven't heard from Big Yid in a while
>>103244313>sensible>libertarianwhat did he mean by this?
He's just a retard who thinks that someone can make AGI in their basement.
>>103244313anyone who manages to build a true superintelligence will be more qualified by merit alone to understand potential risks associated with the technology than yidkowskywhy should such a person care what this smelly jew thinks? all he can do is draw intelligence explosion graphs, showing a complete lack of understanding of the nature of learning in neural systems
>>103244313>you might contaminate theAs opposed to all the companies polluting the environment right fucking now. lel
this guy looks like he ODed on onions and barely came back alive.
>>103244313He's a retard. The only things AI is gonna do are>make people dumber>crash the stock market with no survivors
>>103244808If compared to nuclear applications, it's far more feasible.
>>103244889It's not feasible at all. AGI is fantasy.
>>103244891Are you fantasy?
and how are peopld going to get a gram of unenriched uranium never mind the tonnes needed.
Holy fuck. We really CAN'T HAVE SHIT because of pedophiles and society defeatist AIbros.
>>103244313Only governments have ever made nuclear weapons or used them against humans. Which means the government is the most dangerous.
>>103244313JUDkowsky
>>103244898Are you retarded? Yes.
>>103244913I consider you a general intelligence. What about you is there that cannot be replicated artificially?
>>103244924With present and foreseeable technology, pretty much everything.>but it MIGHT happen in the future because I can IMAGINE it!Ok.
>>103244933If you got made by chance, why do you suppose it's impossible intentionally? It's not even a matter of imagination, it's inevitable at some point. You can argue about the timeframes being irrelevant for us, sure, but denial is just stupid.
>>103244924>humans have general intelligencebehold, 52 narrow intelligences glued together
>>103244313Isn't this the guy that was terrified by GPT2?
>>103244954Timeframes matter. I'm not denying that life like me could form in a billion years. But I am denying that humans are going to make le AGI with our shitty computers any time soon.
>>103244430and you're going to pay for every single gigabyte!
>>103244819Plus considering how much hard AI systems are you're more likely making a tard bot that's good at 1 or 2 specific things
>>103244984yes, you would spend 20 years teaching the fucking thing to reach parity with human abilityand that's assuming you can even run it in real-timei expect the first truly general intelligence on the scale of a human brain won't
Everything he says is perfectly reasonable if you accept his laughable premise that we are presently on the verge of something called "AGI"
>>10324431328th Amendment: A well regulated cluster, being necessary to the technocapital of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear GPUs, shall not be infringed.
>>103244313>AI superintelligence will give itself magic superpowers that it'll use to destroy the human race>d-don't ask how, i-it just will okay
>>103244313Judekowsky is a dirty socialist. He never say anything intelligent or meaningful beyond millenarist commie bullshit. I dont get why anyone listen to him.
>>103245109lol nice strawman
The government has failed to censor cloud AI companies effectively. Why do you think they could censor local AI?
>>103244313>the freedom of your fist stops at my noseIt's not my fault your nose keeps extending throughout spacetime.
>>103244313Yud is always right.>>103244905It's like he singlehandedly inherited 100% of the allotted intellectual honesty for Jews, like at the race stats creation screen at the beginning of Earth someone was like "lel let's minmax this race so there's like just one dude who's really rational and level headed and every other member of the race are all just absolute neurotic shitheads."
>>103245017Nah. Even if AGI is on the corner centralization just makes the risks worse. Why is it better if the political elite enslaves us in an automated high tech distopia? Politicians are not your daddy and mommy.
>>103244313Eliezer Yudkowsky is only right in the sense that he's fucking braindead and you are a flaming faggot0/10 obvious retard
>>103244973How can people like this exist on 4chan, /g/ no less? Have you actually been living under a literal rock the past 2 years?
>>103244313He is the type of guy who talk hours about how you should solve technical problems but he could not solve any of them by himself.
>>103244313>put solar panels on my roof>put solar panels in my yard>garage is one big bank of batteries >all purchased with cash>house filled with GPUs running the most racist AI ever conceived Regulate these balls, nigga lmao
>>103244973I think 100-1000 pieces of H200 has enough capacity to model the human forebrain. We just dont know shit about our brain.
>>103244313I agree.
>>103246910Go back to north korea!
>>103244313>arguing about what should be regulated in a libertarian society what a fruitless endeavor, 90% of your cohorts will call you a statist fascist before getting past the first few words
>>103244313>your freedom stops at our fearahhahafaggots
>>103244924>What about you is there that cannot be replicated artificially?EverythingYou may be failing to understand:1/ the nature of life2/ the nature of reality3/ the nature of consciousness
>>103244313No, we should all have the freedom to punch him in the face. A fundamental human right.
>still no idea how our brain works>LLMs are fancy database searches with autocomplete>AGI 2 weeksIdk how long it will take, likely decades, but eventually this shit is going to rape the stock market with no survivors, likely when the early investor Jews have made insane profits and dump it on the common idiot's 401k and endowments. Absolutely evil.
>>103247742You'd be correct, I have no clue, only assumptions.>1/ the nature of life>3/ the nature of consciousnessI think panpsychism is closest to how that works. Divine spark seems weird considering how dogs dream as well.>2/ the nature of realityAre you impkying that there's someone who does understand reality? Arrogant idea.
Are people investing in AI purely speculating that LLMs will surpass human knowledge, or are they just betting that people will pay subscription fees to use LLMs for tasks? /That seems like a really important thing to understand if this bubble is going to pop in an explosive way.
AGI will never exist because it doesn't have a soul.
>>103247866Does a devil need one to deceive you?
>>103244313Everything he said violates the NAP. He should be shot and killed with extreme prejudice like all statists. Owning nukes is a constitutional right guaranteed by the Second Amendment.
>>103244313somehow retards assume governments even can have that sort of monitoring.you fell for the all powerful government. thats why you give all your money to it. always.that is why you are a slavethe only thing the government is capable of is destruction.if you dont pay taxes, they destroy you.if you dont fill in a form which describes what you do everyday, they can destroy you.the government does not even need to surveil you. they can just threaten you and you will tell them anyway.besides, jews love surveillance so nothing new there. thats one of the reasons some jews and good boy goys from DARPA made the Internet.so everyone uses the same easy-to-monitor channels. much easier to listen to a central server than to install microphones in everyone's houses.
>>103244313>equating physical violence and poisonous radiation with GPUsNice rhetoric but I ain't buying it.
>>103244313>Is big yud right?No.
If I have the power to make something like that then this city belongs to me and I'm not worried about your opinion.Do not be afraid, either. I am your new police with my uranium warehouse.
>>103244313>whiny pseud has an opinion
>>103244889>bot tries to buy uranium>instantly gets swattedyou're fucking retarded
Honestly, I don't see anything wrong with this.
>>103244313whole lot of twitter """"libertartians"""" that sure do love big government out there, huh
>>103244313I unironically enjoyed his Harry Potter fan fiction, but this guy needs to leave AI to the professionals.
I'm convinced that asking an anon's opinions of Yud's thoughts on AI is the /g/ equivalent of the breakfast question.
>>103244522Precedent for what?Someone using a deepfake to cause harm?Someone using AI assistance to write a virus?Someone using an autonomous AI to run the command and control server for a virus?I'm guessing what you really mean is: we can only start to work on the laws that would prevent catastrophic risks once the AI has already taken over the economy and media and most computers.
>freedom ends at nose
>>103244313If you don't like freedom you're a traitor bootlickerFreedom is scary, deal with it
>>103244313why would you post this? you're not a fed
>>103244313First get the gov to monitor borders, all of them. Then get the gov to enforce migration and point of entry laws. Then instead of giving money to illegals give it to US citizens. Then maybe we can talk about GPU's to which the answer would be to fuck right off.
>>103244313Yudkowsky has never been right about anything. He certainly isn't a libertarian - a real libertarian advocates that every man should have his own personal nuclear bomb.
>>103244772i've already drafted a preliminary version of the readme.md, i'll get started with the code of conduct now!
>>103244843>onionswtf I wrote "onions" not "onions"am i pwnd or just having a stroke??
>>103244979Gigabyte? whoa, there. ISP CEOs need another yacht and a private jet. Its going to be megabyte and you will be happy its not kilobytes.
>>103250823>a real libertarian advocates that every man should have his own personal nuclear bomb.And they'd be right.
Yudkowsky has never developed AI before. He has never preprocessed a dataset so that it could be turned into useful feature vectors. He has never opened VS Code, pulled some tensorflow or pytorch libraries, and written a neural network architecture using those libraries. He has never trained a neural network on a dataset he has personally preprocessed, nor has he fine tuned such a neural network to improve its performance across various metrics. He has never tested a neural network on a hold out set to see how it works outside of its training environment. He has never written a classifier, nor a generative model. For that matter, he has never even written code that uses reinforcement learning.He is wholly unqualified to opine about the capabilities of artificial intelligence.
>>103250957you don't need to have a biology degree to know that China can't be trusted to do gain of function research on viruses
>>103250989The man thinks AI can behave in a manner like what we see in science fiction. This is not an opinion anyone who has actually written AI code would form.
>>103251033>a manner like what we see in science fictioncan you be more specific? the movie Her was science fiction just a few years ago but now the technology depicted in it looks quaint and primitive.
>>103251060The man imagines AI is going to turn out like the Terminator movies, or something similar. The apocalyptic scenarios he dreams up don't even make sense, because no matter how intelligent you make an AI, it doesn't have any sensors or actuators beyond what it's given. Generally speaking, you can't "accidentally" end up with an AI that can reprogram itself to do more than it was intended to do. They can no more give themselves the ability to launch nuclear weapons than you can make your kidneys turn ethanol into propane.
>>103251237>no matter how intelligent you make an AI, it doesn't have any sensors or actuators beyond what it's givenwhat if i told you that the AI will be connected to the internet, and there are sensors and actuators that are also connected to the internet?
>>103244313those things are a danger to the individual and the publicWORDS, as much as you'd like them to be atomic bombs, are not.
>>103251500>words aren't bombswords includes software, and it turns out that some software can be harmful to the economy or even to people's health.
>>103244313>[your freedom] stops at my noseI don't even need the early life section.
>>103244313Isn't he the guy who said:>Give me a proven method to lose weight, but don't tell me that I have to exercise and eat healthy.
>>103244313>being restricted from building a GPU render farm because people are afraid you're going to build an IRL SkynetI just want to render my 3D animations, man.
>>103244313"Yudkowsky"lmao
>>103251033Except for all the other AI devs that agree with him.
>>103251657No, he claimed to suffer from a high metabolic (rather than hedonic) set-point for his natural body weight which meant that controlling food intake was not realistic.https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5053237/Compounding this, he also claimed to suffer from exercise intolerance, which makes exercise actively harmful for people no matter how gradually they try to adjust to it.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exercise_intoleranceYou might believe he is lying about one or both of those conditions, but they do exist, and you're not a doctor.If he was blond and had sane takes on AI, people would be more likely to accept his supposed disabilities, but our culture tells us that if someone is fat and ugly then that must represent some sort of moral failing for which they deserve ridicule and punishment.Fortunately, drugs like Ozempic will start to change that perception, at least for rich people who can afford it.
>>103244313No, and this is why the U.S. shouldn't allow immigration or participate in the U.N. Freedom hating foreigners are a disease.
>>103244313Libertarians are the biggest retards to ever exist.
