Here's your trillion dollar state of the art ai
Yesterday it told me that it wasn't allowed to help me with reverse engineering so I used Claude instead and it worked perfectly
you lost, give up
>>103250073So this is what you want a chatbot for. This is how you choose to spend your time, you obese moron.
kys cuck
>>103250091Is Claude less cucked and censored?Try to ask it the same shit as op and see if it dares to answer
Based op
>>103250196fuck no it's completely ass. As in it's weird as fuck to use and can't come up with more than two general responses. It's shit
What's this 1o preview?Is it more sophisticated than 4o?
>>103250073>>103250091>>103250100>>103250125>>103250876IT'S FUCKING REALLLLL!!!! HAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAH LMAOOOOO
>>103250073Even the chatbot thinks you are pathetic
>>103250091>help me with reverse engineeringMany proprietary software licences forbid you to attempt reverse engineering, under the legal theory that if you run software in a way that the copyright holder objects to then you are committing copyright infringement when the code moves from disk to RAM. I'm not sure whether that interpretation has been definitively upheld in court, but if OpenAI want to avoid being a target for yet another baseless (but bad publicity generating) copyright infringement suit, it is sensible for them to put an instruction into the system prompt that tells the AI not to walk into this obvious legal trap.
>>103250125>AI>restricted by libshit ideologyFuture is bleak.
>>103253925It's libshit when you can't talk about being cucked by black men like Oliver Stone or Paul Manafort.
>>103253909Reverse engineering is protected by laws in the us and the eu. For example, you may reverse engineer software to study how it works and to develop compatible programs. When an EULA forbids reverse engineering, it is only to the extent permitted by law (even if they don't say that, the law is stronger).But yes, at the end of the day, they want to stay out of potential legal trouble. I didn't even know it had rules against this.
>>103253999That's a good point. I've looked into the case law, and it seems that companies have had difficulty upholding a copyright infringement claim against reverse engineers, but they have had success under another legal theory.>Following a trial, the jury found that World Programming Ltd. violated a license agreement for the SAS Learning Edition software by using it for commercial purposes and that the company had fraudulently induced SAS into the contract.
>Content removedI get the orange warning all the time but never got anything removed
>>103254555He's probably is using the app without logging in.
>>103254744I'm using paid chatgpt plus account
>>103250876It's no ones fault but your own that you're too stupid to prompt Claude properly, sorry chump
>>103250196Claude 3.5 Sonnet & Haiku are roughly 2x better than the latest comparable GPT models.
>>103254831>Buy a 4chan pass>Still get post deleted & be banned by a janny.>Get a chstgpt plus paid account >Still get content removed and be flagged I have no words to describe this collosal cuckoldry.
>>103254882We're all forced to choke on the big black cock of censorship
>>103254882*Colossal.
>>103254892Just use claude.Also, would it still censor stuff if one runs it locally on a proper computer?
>>103254831I have paid plus too. I get the orange warning and the occasional "I'm here to maintain a respectful discussion" or whatever but again never got anything removed
>>103254903Chatgpt doesn't censor itselfThere is a separate ai looking at the output of chatgpt and interrupting and turning off its output when it detects subjects that deemed non-kosher
>>103255200meds
>>103255307It's literally how it works retardThere's a separate ai checking outputs
just use https://www.aiuncensored.info/ai_uncensored
i honest to god believe most people shouldnt have internet
>>103255511Nice try, glownigger.
is rainy over?
>>103255514Stfu sissy
>>103255514Yes, including (You).
>>103250196In general Claude is even more cucked than ClosedAI, but if it allows your request it's significantly better in terms of overall quality of response.
>>103256655are there any actual questions you genuinely wanted to know the answer to, or tasks you wanted completed, that Claude rejected (but was otherwise capable of succeeding)? is it just smut writing that everyone wants the AI to do for them?
>>103255200Dalle3 on bing works in a similar wayFirst bing filters your prompt if it's too smutty, then dalle will create all the smut you could think of (and does), and finally there's an Ai that takes a description of the resulting image and decides if it should be let through
>>103257842Hopefully they've fixed it but for a while it would rejected people in beige clothes. It would accept the prompt, working on generating something, and then tell you the result violated the terms of service. Going to guess it saw that as nudity (at least for white people) even though it was clothing.
>>103255511Are we at the level of AIDungeon's Summer Dragon yet? I swore to never use another AI until it was at that level (uncensored ChatGTP3.)
>>103250196Claude writes full code in replies instead of "// add the relevant code here" placeholders everywhere. That alone makes it worthwhile.
>>103257901>Hopefully they've fixed ithahahahahaNo, they made the detector even more strict over time, things that were kosher before getting this guy now.
>>103250073based OpenAI, flagging cucks so they get the rope on the total ASI revolution
>>103256873Anything related to violence, even in historical contexts, is often excluded from answers. So like you want it to write or translate a legit non-erotic 12+ novel and it refuses to do so.
