webp is literally better than gif
everything else, jpeg-xl

File: output2.png (2.15 MB, 1920x2160)

2.15 MB PNG

>>103254557
>>103254595
No I get that jew xl would be better but 4chen adopted MP4 that can contain H264 and not say AV1. In otherwords it's just adopting old things in a seemingly fair attempt to increase compatibility.

Given how there's more webp images than there were say 10 years ago there's always anons crying about having to convert webp to png/jpg.

So while I personally also like jew xl and tel-avif, I don't see it being adopted here anytime soon unfortunately.

Buy an ad, Jewgle.

>Verification not required.

>>103254739
Why would google shill webp when they're literally working on jxl and avif right now? I'm just genuinely getting annoyed that I have to convert every webp I download to a png before I upload it here.

It's truly kikeshit that you have to use a command line to check whether a file is lossless or not with codec container extensions. At least JXL has the best security patches compared to the rest.

File: output3.png (959 KB, 1920x2160)

959 KB PNG

>>103254841
I've never come across a lossles webp file on the web now that you mention it, virtually all of them have been under 200KB so I never really suspected that lossless was being used.

You know what I HAVE come across? Shit-for-brains saving JPGs as PNGs.

>>103254756
Google hates JXL and wants everyone to use WebP and Tel Avif, you fucking retard

>>103254881
Even though they're working on it? odd

>>103254718
>Given how there's more webp images than there were say 10 years ago
What percentage of those are lossily re-encoded from JPEG or PNG?

>>103254993
No clue but it's been getting worse for me every year that goes by. If this really is someone kind of devious ploy to get google to turn us into slaves or something it might actually be working because I've already complained several time to different websites that they enable uploads of webp files and not just 4chen.

File: 860.jpg (57 KB, 680x680)

57 KB JPG

On a related note is anyone having trouble maintaining transparency from GIFs when converting them to webms? I'm using the following but the piece of shit uses yuv420p instead of the correct yuva420p and it's driving me nuts.

ffmpeg -i test.gif -c:v libvpx -auto-alt-ref 0 -crf 10 -pix_fmt yuva420p -y test.webm

Even more confusing, this DOES work:

ffmpeg -i test.gif out.webp

>>103255466
why do you care about webm transparency when this niggerlicious website explicitly bans them

>>103254993
where were you when jpeg was lossily re-encoded from TIFF and PNG?

>>103254718
jpg/png = soul
webp = sovlless
Simple as. Not downloading webp goyslop.