how the fuck are cameras still so bad in low light conditions compared to our eyes despite the amount of them needed for so many devices in the world for so long?
Becaise digital camerad suck at absorbing light?That's why you use a professional camera if you want something that's as close as possible to the human eye
>>103293840We haven’t built a machine that can drive or one that’s as powerful as the human brain yet either. Why is this what you’re worried about? Just hold your phone still
>>103293911ofc I mean when there's no natural light
>>103293840The human eye's superior light detection per relative size is due to its highly sensitive photoreceptors, dynamic adaptation mechanisms, efficient neural processing, and excellent signal-to-noise handling. Camera sensors, constrained by physical size, material properties, and technological limitations, cannot match the eye's ability to detect and process low levels of light, especially when comparing devices of similar size.
>>103293840>Phone camera>Bad at nightMy sister in Christ, Google night sight has been available since like 2019 or something
>>103295327It's still incredible to me that the eye even exists. Nature is incredible.
>>103293840Eyes are literally an extension of the brain. Imagine if every phone camera was connected to a supercomputer that is specialized to process video and images in real time.>well achkchuallyNo, a smartphone is not a supercomputer. You ishart or xiaoshit is light years away from a human brain.
>>103293840idk my shitty phone can make day out of night
>>103293933natural light and artificial light are the same
>>103295993mine can make women out of men
