redpill me on wireguardwhy doesn't anon use it?
i use openvpn for games
because when vpns were getting banned in my country, wireguard went out first and foremost due its unique fingerprint, openvpn protocol at least put up a somewhat of a fight. still trash though. what you want is cloak+openvpn or vless xtls. forget about wireguard, it's fucking pozzed
>>103321071sounds like a great country
>>103321071Change country...
>>103320968I dont use VPNs at all
>>103321082>>103321083>insecure, snake oil technology that can easily be detected is le good
>>103320979>i use openvpnthisI'm not using pozguard because some glowie ass shills it
>>103321071How exactly is WG pozzed? Isn't it open source?
>>103321245if it so easily detectable then it's not secure at all. in openvpn there are some precautions you can do on server side to prevent bad actors from jacking your connection AT LEAST. wireguard has non of it because it uses udp, an extremely unique protocol that's easy to spoof via fingerprint unique to wireguard
>>103321071>>103321186>>103321208>>103321276>WIREGUARD LE BAD CEASE USAGE IMMEDIATELYwow yes very organic posts going on here definitely not glownigger shenanigans how do you do fellow 4channellers
>>103320968I'm literally using it right now so that this website doesn't make me wait 15 minutes
>>103321071nigga I'm using wg to access my home network, not to bypass geoblocks or whatever
>>103321319reversed ssh proxy is far superior for that
>>103321329Can you explain reverse ssh proxy like im 5 real quick please
>>103321292You are the one expecting everyone to switch from OpenVPN to some shit written by a tranny. Glow more.
>>103321313It's not that simple, you still need 2 cookies. Do you copy them over from your main machine?
>>103321186you're just mad because you live in an authoritarian shithole. wireguard's job is to create a secure tunnel, not to mask its own presence. there are probably third party tools that would let you do that.
>>103320968Because I use vless-xtls-reality.
>>103321365not spoonfeeding you, retard
It has one job and it does it well. People who have a problem with it likely want features that are not a part of its design goals and can likely be composed with other protocols.
I used it to connect my bro's household to my own, so we could both access the NAS / media server and play vidya together more easily. I used the pfSense plugin on both sides and about every month or two the tunnel would die and stay dead for days. I never figured out the cause of the issue.Some older vidya wouldn't connect on LAN because WG is Layer 3 only, so I had to use OpenVPN in Layer 2 mode to make it work. Me and my bro live in the same household now, so we have no need for a VPN at the moment. If we need it in the future, I'll probably look into Libreswan.
>>103321329How is it superior when you can't even establish UDP connections over it without having them be tunnelled over TCP? What's so superior about it? Authentication? I don't need that at all
>>103321656Sounds very cute anon, when's the wedding?
>>103320968I've always preferred SoftEther for some reason. Probably its configurability and speaking a half-dozen protocols.
>>103320968I use it cause the config is simple, ciphers are secure, and the speeds are fast.However,>>103321071As mentioned by this anon, it's meant to be fast not stealthy. However, 'stealth' is more for countries with deep packet inspection and psychotic censorship that would get you black bagged.
>>103320968I do use it. I need max throughput and to my knowledge there isn't a better vpn protocol for that.
>>103321866I was surprised to find out most people don't have a good, let alone a close, relationship with their siblings. Varg advocates for the kind of society where your neighbours are your relatives, so I guess I'm cool with that idea.
>>103321561Redpill me?
>>103321400Citation needed kid
>>103321400I think it goes without saying that it doesn't fit everyone's needs, so obviously don't use it if your infrastructure is built around openvpn.However, it is extremely lightweight and only uses a tried and tested handful of preexisting ciphers. Plus, the codebase is a lot smaller than openvpn so the likelihood of a vulnerability is practically zero. >>103321071>>103321186>>103321208> insecureWireguard isn't "creating something new". It's just patching together ciphers that have been around for ages. Out of all the ciphers, the most recent one is chacha20-poly1305 and that's almost a decade old. And even then, both ciphers are older than that (2008 and 2005 respectively)
>>103321672Did you cry this much the first time your dad fucked you?
>>103322032Vpn and wg don't work here.
>>103322079No need, cause I was laughing at you getting mogged by the leukemia riddled hogsweat known as ya madda.
>>103321071>My country does deep packet inspection and arrests you for any traffic they can't immediately understand Ok and? Any other VPN can only best effort obfuscate which will never be perfect.Also Russians should be banned from this site anyway. Fuck off.
Only reason to not use WireGuard is that it's layer 3 and you need a different VPN if you want tunneled layer 2, like tinc.
And because fee-fees tied to externalised egos got hurt, it degenerated into another apes-slinging-shit tardthread.
>>103321365ssh -D 127.0.0.1:2222 local@home
>>103322032majority of internet uses https protocol. using literally anything else makes you stick out like sore thumb to glowies. vless does what's called mimicry to look like regular https, think of it like doh for dns
>>103321329How is it superior?
>tool not built with use case X in mind doesn't work for me requiring X, therefore it sucksbased retards at it again
>>103322220It isn't and he's talking about SOCKS. There are VPN tunneling options with SSH, but they're only useful if you're literally too lazy to set up anything else instead. SOCKS and port forwards are handy in a pinch, but that's about it.
>>103320968I use it to connect to my docker containers at home. It's cheap and protects my traffic while I'm outside
>>103321879I tried to use it but after a while it starts to become really unstable and the connection lags and crashes
>>103320968>good enough encryption>piss easy configuration>UDP only, server port undetectable>fastest protocol there isI wish I knew what that Wireguard thing on my router was earlier than I realized, no need to fuck around with OpenVPN or L2TP/IPsec config bullshit, just werks, I get to connect back to my home easily and securely. There's no reason not to use it. Assuming of course your home network has a private IP w/ port forwarding at minimum, the dynamic IP issue can always be alleviated with DynDNS. Or, alternatively you pay for a VPS to act as a server and your home network and peer devices become the clients instead.>>103321071Idk then use one of whichever forks that do DPI obfuscation instead of blaming Wireguard for your government being ran by a narcissistic egotistical balding ex-KGB apparatchik that hates personal freedoms. It's not the fault of WG devs your government is gay.
>>103320968i plan to use it when i travel in a portable modem i have to conect to my house. but right now i have no need, as i dont have any server or travel for work. will use again tho when the time comes
