I fucking hate it.
arasaka technologies
>RANDIRK
>>103565366CANDICKlmao that's a funny "burgers?" example hahahaha
sandisk old has premium feelingsandisk new feels like korean chinkshit
For me it's Kingston.
>>103565464Adata
>SANDICK
I fucking love it. 80s logo design and saying fuck minimalism that every single other company is doing.
I appreciate it not devolving into more flatshit and minimal direction but this looks like they accidentally cropped the bottom of the jpg and just uploaded that one.Not like I really care about what the hell the sandisk logo looks like though.
>>103565550sÖyjak
>>103565366Now loses as much data as it's lost of the letters in the logo.>>103565406This is what I read as well.
I thought it was named ScanDisk got a decade
> Company known for data storage devices> Logo consisting of corrupted half-erased lettersWhat they are trying to confer? That data will be corrupted on their ssd's?
>>103565366You are like little babby
>>103565366someone got paid thousands for that shitty logo
>>103565366>>103566462that's meta, showing data corruption upfront on their logo
>>103565366>candick
>>103565366What's with companies rebranding right when their oldshit hits soul level and recognition. In two years every company is going to move to Serif text again.
I like it.
>sansdick
>>103565366I don't know how those S's made it out of committee
>>103565366>MAKE IT LOOK LIKE ALIEXPRESS "SXZGNREOKN" CHINKSHIT, our brand is too trustworthy
>>103565366
>>103565366The new one looks objectively worse, but the old one looked too similar to the SanDian logo.
>>103565366The new logo tells me one thing:Their product loses bits.
>.CANDI.CKwhat did she mean by this?
>>103565406Top kek this
>>103565444checked
>>103565502Sans dick*
Behold the TRUE and HONEST sandisk
>>103565366A graphic design firm or some other fruity fake fucking designer was responsible for this. He was hired, paid to do it and the SanDisk bosses thought the new logo looks goodShows just how incompetent you can be and you wil stilll be employed and make millions. Crazy
>>103570622KEEEEK
>>103565464SUMBODY CALL NINE WON WON
>>103565366I like itFuturistic vibesAt least it's not another Helvetica logo
whoever keeps making these logo designs needs to be decapitated instantly.I've had enough of this crap, this has been going on for 10 fucking years already.
>>103565406sansouless SOVLDISK
I like itthe other logo always made me think of Times New Roman but this one is like something from an 80s Japanese business
>get bought out by kike digital>lose your sovlmany such cases
>>103566509heh
>>103566462metal gear solid
>>103566462Is that the new captcha?
>>103565366>Logo has unrecoverable sectorsOH NO!
>candick
>>103565366Looks tech as fuck! I like it
Has there ever been a more hazardous trend to UI than minimalism
>>103570609
>>103565366both radiate soul
For me it's SunDisk.
>>103565366I like it
>>103565366I hate the retard who put NEW on the left and OLD on the right more.
>>103565366i fucking love it. seriously looks sick af
>>103568551It was also too close to the ShanDian logo too.
>new logo is at least still stylized
>>103565366lulwhat the fuck is that shit?
>>103578848ShamDisk when? I want to buy ShamDisk branded Micro Cards.
>>103578562Does this help?
>>103579957missing or corrupted logo = missing or corrupted data.
>>103565366I fucking love it.
>>103566509underrated
>>103565366neither logo is particularly good. might as well jsut use arial
>>103577663>zvndick
>>103577809SunDisk is a much better name than SanDisk.
>>103579957You forgot this emoji:
>>103582242Apparently emojis dont work. Imagine the one that's laughing with tears in his eyes.
>>103565366>>103565406>SANDICK
>>103565366>putting new on the leftI fucking hate zoomers as well
>>103566509LOL
>my name is OP>I like candy cocks>that's why I bought CANDICK
>>103565366old logo looked like shit. It's only (You) who thought this worth making a thread about it
>>103565366If you were to show me the new logo without context, I would legitimately think this company sells cans full of dicks inside.
>>103565366Their old logo was pure sovl
>>103565366nooothey done goofed with that one
>>103565366Makes me think they're missing data, not great for a memory company kek
>>103565366thank you for your opinion
>>103565444fucking thic
>>103582193It was their original name, but they had to change it because of Sun
>>103583184>an optical disc in a vintage hard drive casing
>>103565366>bigger>less legible>no reason to change it, old looks fineBad decision. Implies lack of direction in company
>>103565366It's not the worst of all redesigns. They at least tried to keep some identity. Google/facebook/etc had way worse rebrands.
>CANDICKwell played, sandisk, well played.
>>103565366this is what the company's want tho, it's the outrage that makes the change worthwhile for them. If we all just didn't say anything this shitty trend would stop
>New logo has more soulYeah I’m thinking based
>>103565366I like it, but the old one is still far better>>103566614>In two years every company is going to move to Serif text again.I doubt it. Zoomers can hardly read, so serif fonts are too much for them.
>>103565553I like it, it perfectly encapsulates the kind of data loss and corruption you can expect from their products.
