>>106460373Linus rejected PaX/Grsecurity hardening of the kernel in 2008. MacOSX implemented the hardening features of PaX, so did Microsoft to some degree aswellLinux became a completely absolutely dogshit insecure system.When it once was the most secure.Then Linus refused to allow anyone to enforce the GPL copyright on their kernel code, and launched hate campaigns against the one French printer driver guy who did; doing a 180 on his earlier claims to enforce (in the 90s) "anyone that violated the GPL".He then threw all the hackers out of Linux kernel development, implemented a real-world-name-only requirement for contributions, and banned any anti-feminists males from kernel development, implementing speech codes against them.He and his friends now brag that they removed 100 percent of pre-2000 hacker code from the linux kernel: and that they freed up 100kb of space for wallpapers by removing the, working till the day it was removed, ReiserFS code.ReiserFS made linux on the data center and laptops. Before that linux was a toy OS. Grsecurity made linux a usable webhost platform.Linus spit on both those people. He spit on everyone that ever helped him.That's why hackers left linux: they were kicked out. When he needed them in 1993 he begged them. They answered. Then he betrayed them.Same with RMS: who won't enforce the copyrights: though he said the whole point of donating to the FSF was to1) hire programmers to write free software2) defend the GPL.The money just goes to women.
Is Grsecurity actually useful in 2025?
Hello again, Mike. I've been quietly tracking your threads using a (quite ugly) script. I'm going to feed all your ramblings to an LLM and start posting exactly like you in the near future.Sincerely, your #1 hater.
>>106461949>Before that linux was a toy OSafter that too
>>106461949Oh no retard-kun, did they remove the obsolete FS that no one is using or maintaining? Truly the end of the Linux kernel.
>>106461949Hello again, sir
