Be honest with me. I really like the language but does it have a commercial future?
in the sense that it's always worth learning new things, sure why not
>>108634480omg i still care so much >>108626815
>Folkert de Vriesso we're not calling them freedom fries anymore, eh
>>108634480>Folkert de Vries>he writes the code
>>108634535Just put De Vries in the bag.
op is probably a tranny. they love inflating their actually relatively miniscule contribution under the guise of such /g/eet "haha look trannies" threads.you can see the actual top-level teams here:https://rust-lang.org/governance/picrel is the current lang team (the most important one).you can see all 119 teams and their members here:https://rust-lang.org/governance/teams/no such a thing as "rust maintainers team".op's pic comes from a site called RustNL, a dutch community/non-profit site.https://rustnl.org/maintainers/that is not to say that all these names are unknown or completely irrelevant. but they are not THAT important either.a bunch of trannies and their friends can literally create such a site for any mainstream language.and none of this is actually important or technically relevant in any case. only tech illiterates would fall for such ploys, and only an illogical person would care regardless.suppose trannies' contribution to rust was actually 60/70/80%, a logical and a meritocratic would care about the technical merit of that contribution not its source (assuming there are no restrictions on usage which is the case).can't-do genderists hate meritocracy of course (see The Post-Meritocracy Manifesto), so can-do trannies actually cause them (the can't-doers) a confliction of good propaganda vs. envy lol
>>108635621>hes in denialjust use go, zig, c, c++ or literally anything else bud.
>>108634480Who is You?
Looks like a cool bunch of chaps.
>>108634577It puts the Vries in the basket.
