It's unironically over for low skill, low creativity designers. AI will never be able to match the spark of the human soul. It will get better and better at approximating it. But it won't get there. I, for one, am really looking forward to how graphic design will react to this in the coming years.
>>453227>AI will never be able to match the spark of the human soul.He just did that. Open your eyes.
Low effort bait, these are so shit lol.
>>453225AI stuff is good until client asks for .psd/.ai file
>>453227The problem is, and this applies to all fields, is that your job won't be to make that logo anymore.Your job will be to take the AI's output and fix it until it looks like something you could have arrived at given enough time.You'll be paid worse as a result, it will be an employer's market for the next hundred years. After that the global economy, indeed the globe itself, will have stagnated and declined to such a degree due to the majority of people being low value, low productivity people (because they're not allowed to be productive).A new, enduring darkness will descend upon humanity, a digital Dark Ages that will last for thousands of years.
>>453227cope seeth sneed
i could easly made 4 better looking logos then this in a time someone writing this prompt kek1/3 and 4 is like 5 minutes each with better results, straight letters and in vectors, the second one cant be considered a logotype anyway
>>453225In some cases yes (yours) in some cases no
>>453227This is what I think.Is ai art good? NoWill it replace a lot of art jobs? Yes
>>453225not because of AI but because GDers are bunch a low balling, spineless, let me work for free please, dunce cap wearing cowards.you let managers devalue your craft too, fucking disgusting
>>453227>AI will never be able to match the spark of the human soul. Fpbp
>>453227>AI will never be able to match the spark of the human soul.You guys are making logos for base commerce. Spark of the human soul, Jesus Christ...
>>453225That's crap, and if that's better than what you're doing, stop making crap
>>454391I'm straight up not trying to be rude we've all made crap, and I've made plenty of crap. Before 2022, there were "free logo generator" sites that would make logos for free with templates that look just like OP and maybe even better.
>>453225coolnow get it to separate all the elements into vector layers so you can actually print legible labels instead of shitposting on a cantonese cartoon corral
i love how recoiling art fags can only muster up "its shit"
>>454879I bet it would do this if you asked
They won't really be cost-saving for actual design work until and unless some better tooling is built around it. Stable Diffusion still sucks but has the best, if still inadequate, tooling, DALL-E and stuff tend to produce better images by default but are also impossible to actually work with after the fact.Adobe will eventually properly integrate it into photoshop, or someone else will create some good tooling around it, and then there'll be a lot fewer, less skilled, cheaper, and more productive professional designers.Then you'll have to get a job that isn't also fun like 99% of the population already does. Boo hoo.
>>455010Who said graphic design was fun.
>>454212kek every designer think he is the next hot shit, really the most pretentious field
>>453225DALL-E cannot output SVGs.
>>453513You realize that Illustrator has a vectorize and image trace tool to do this automatically?
>>455327Oh no, he has to do one extra step and that is to Google JPG/PNG to SVG. Damn!
>>455328you never fucking used that function, did you? kek, go ahead and try that with OPs results.
