Share designs and graphics utilizing noise.
>>458699>low effort shit :|>low effort shit, noise or some other digital or analogue artifacts texture :O
>>458699I have to admit, most noise-related designs haven't aged that well...I absolutely loved noising the shit out of everything 5 years ago, but now I'm so careful with it.
>>458707dude you don't understandit's like 3d but it's actually 2d and that's CRAZY!
>>458709If done well I think it's a nice addition to current digital design trends. What gave me the idea for the thread was the redesign of https://motion.dev/ which I think would look emptier, and worse, without the subtle noise overlay.
>>458726>I think would look emptier, and worse, without the subtle noise overlay.that is the truth, it IS literary empty and bad when a noise texture must be there on top of all the other stylistic clutter to 'save' it a.k.a. how to over-design 2 to 5 paragraphs of text and 3 links.it also promotes obnoxious ms powerpoint style web animation that impresses no one in 2024. please prioritize accessibility, legibility, ergonomics, low external dependencies and bandwith utilization and instant load times etc instead of trying to make flash sites with javascript, at least for things that people actually (need to) use, i don't need to see choppy 20-53 fps css animations cuz some macbook tard thought if was "dope" and true artistic expression that the numbers scroll like a flip clock or something or replace mouse scrollwheel interaction with something elsehere is another responsive, developer oriented website, but made around 1999 with some modest typesetting and gui navigation considerations (limited to the html of that time for better or worse) and it works and does not need wobbly crap on every scroll wheel input to teach u the subject matter with code samples still in 2024 - https://c-faq.com/
Where's the design, though? Where's the brand? Where's GSAP, Three.js, Rive, D3, where's the interactivity? Are you a lazy dev? You will not win any Awwwards without them.
>>458728I forgot to tag you >>458727
>>458727I get the general sentiment, but the no-design maximalism is fucking retarded.> please prioritize accessibility, legibility, ergonomics, low external dependencies and bandwith utilizationNone of these are at odds with good design. And lack of design does not imply any of these things, as shown by your great example that shits on all of these except for maybe bandwidth.Instead of being a rambling piece shit and trying to prove your point with an example that cares about maybe one of these things, post something actually useful or stfu. Go derail a different thread.
