File: 1729560345983937.webm (2.77 MB, 852x480)

2.77 MB WEBM

3

File: 1702403027673752.webm (3.72 MB, 852x480)

3.72 MB WEBM

>get horny
>open up Lena Paul lesbian kino
>plot is all an excuse so she can say at some point "my body my choice"
>close porn
Thanks Lena

>>28163726

Them supporting abortion is what broke you, but not the fact that they are literally doing porn?

File: 1722914406317174.webm (3.86 MB, 852x480)

3.86 MB WEBM

>>28163757
It's vile enough to override decades of pornographic conditioning and indoctrination.

>>28163726
While I don't think it should be widely promoted, I'm not anti-abortion. I say this as someone who believes abortion is killing babies and the "clump of cells" argument is just a cope to relieve guilt. While I believe a child can ascend the sins of their parents, I have no issue with victims of rape or those whose pregnancy jeopardizes their own life getting an abortion. I also think there are some groups of people who shouldn't have children. Porn stars are among them. They should probably get their tubes tied.

Just think of the emotional damage you're going to be putting those kids through. There's no secrecy to this work. Coal burners who don't even show their face can get doxed nowadays. It's one thing if your porn history consists of you posting nudes/masturbating or exclusively fucking your spouse. Your kids probably still would get bullied, but it's far less humiliating than having a cuck and whore as parents. Riley Reid's kid is a preteen and she's had to switch schools because the kid's classmate's parents recognized her and shit started hitting the fan. That isn't going to be easier once that kid's classmates get old enough to look for porn themselves.

There are older women who get into porn as a mid-life crisis "I'm still hot, right?" thing. I have to assume they don't care much about their kids.

>>28163726
Demons are kinda erotica, aren't they?

>>28163896
So if it's baby killing, why do the babies of rape victims deserve to die? Just because you were conceived in a shitty way doesn't mean you should be deleted. There are plenty of people born of rape who lead fulfilling lives, and even if they didn't, they're capable. Riley Reid's kid, a child of a rape victim, and the child conceived in incest deserves life as much as you or me.

If you want to be logically consistent, a person is a person, no matter how small or neglected, or doomed for destitution or deformed they are.

Abortion is child sacrifice, and is very rarely done for any reason other than convenience.

>>28164214
From a utilitarian perspective it's hard to know if any particular abortion is going to be a net positive or negative. For an unwilling mother, there is 9 months of moderate to extreme discomfort and psychological distress, plus 18 years of indentured servitude to the unwanted child. For the child, you have an entire lifetime that could really go either way. Most people live a net positive life, but some of those might offset their own happiness by being shitty people that reduce the happiness of others. And there are plenty whose lives could be considered net negative in terms of happiness. From a utilitarian perspective, it would have been better if those people had been aborted.

>>28163726
So... what, you want some chick to either do a porn shoot with condoms or do a shoot, get pregnant by some rando and be out for a while due to having some randos baby? I don't get it.

>>28164214
So you want to force someone to have a baby that was forced on them? Not everyone wants to raise a rape baby. imagine being forced to look at a kid that looks like the guy who forced himself on you... Imagine going through child birth and all the pain associated with that to birth some dudes rape baby.. People like you make me wish men got pregnant instead because then maybe you would understand why thats not right. I'd be on your side if a man raped a woman, then he should be forced to be a eunuch because in your scenario, there really isn't much repercussion, he rapes, get some jail time, can go out and rape again. Meanwhile, some chick is scarred for life, probably become lesbian, or very hesitant around males. Imagine being said baby that gets born and know your mom probably put you up for adoption or kept you and is resentful towards you because some dude raped her.

The only reason you can feel comfortable saying this is because it doesn't effect you at all, you as the male don't have to raise a rape baby, or have it, or deal with all that. Lots of women have commited suicide over it.

What about right when Roe v Wade was shot down and that child who was raped and had to go to a whole different state just to get an abortion, would you rather a 10~15 (cant remember how old that kid was) be forced to give child birth?

>>28163726
>get horny
>open up porn site
>sees Brandi Love who's against abortion
>close porn site because it's not worthy jerking off to Brandi Love

>>28163771
>decades of indoctrination is bad but centuries is not
what goes on in your head when you look at a mirror?

Imagine being so brainwashed that it prevents you from jacking off lmao.

>>28164214
The children of rapists grow up to be rapists. It's basic evolution.

>>28163726
So I'm assuming you have a pregnancy kink then? I don't really get that fetish, but you do you man. But be careful, that's a pipeline/slippery slope to CP.

>>28164264
I don't want anyone to be forced to do anything, but a chick who was raped who gets pregnant is carrying a person inside her. If she recognizes the personhood of her child, she should carry the child to term, and then put them up for adoption if she can't bear to live with her rapists baby.

Rapists should get a swift trial and then an immediate death penalty not their kids. If men could get pregnant, I'd say the exact same thing. If my wife was raped and conceived a child as a result of rape, it would be the hardest thing imaginable for her and myself to "keep" the baby, but that would be the morally right thing to do.

Imagine being a rape baby who wasn't killed by your mom and the thankfulness you'd have for being alive and brought into this world by a loving mother. We can play pretend all day man, but the bottom line is: all innocent humans deserve to live, or not. Any argument made against the former can be made for anyone, not limited to the unborn. If you argue for the latter, you really can't justify penalties for any kind of murder.

One more thing; abortions for rape babies account for ~0.8% of all abortions. Abortion as a practice is propped up by an appeal to emotion for less than 1 percent of total instances.

>>28164244
>from a utilitarian perspective

so anyone who is a net negative on society and reduces the "happiness" of others should also be killed too then, gotcha. You're reducing my happiness, why don't you off yourself?

Even if your position held water for the unborn specifically, you could apply the same logic and make the case for forced abortions for lower class people cause those children are likely going to be net negatives on society too.

All this being said, banning abortion would not solve any of the societal issues that cause people to get one. Society must be reformed from within before a total ban would work.

>>28164389
>basic evolution

no not every child of a rapist becomes a rapist.

Should we imprison the children of rapists? the children of murderers? the children of car thieves? you probably had an ancestor who committed murder somewhere along the line, I suppose your bloodline can't continue either then.

Maybe you should get a dna test and see if you have the rape gene. Probably would be good to know ahead of time if you were gonna snap and rape someone.

>>28164794
>If my wife was raped and conceived a child as a result of rape, it would be the hardest thing imaginable for her and myself to "keep" the baby, but that would be the morally right thing to do.
imagine being this much of a cuck

Fucking 6/10 onlyfans sluts living in 15th floor apartments with infinite free time, I hate them

>>28164244
>Most people live a net positive life
This is untrue by every metric imaginable. The existence of every person increases the suffering of every other person, and an individual suffers magnitudes more than they experience any sort of positivity.

>>28164880
>imagine being this much of a cuck

in this scenario, my wife's already been raped, so I guess I'm a cuck cause I let that happen? irresponsible and careless and maybe unlucky, yes. cuck, no.

imagine standing before God admitting you killed a baby cause you weren't man enough to not hold a child responsible for the sins of their father.

Say your dad killed my wife, would it be right for me to kill you? would it make me a cuck to let you live?

What if my dad raped my mom tomorrow? I guess I should kill myself then right? Save everybody else the trauma

>>28164989
You're arguing with other 4chan users, which are not the bastion of morality. You're casting pearls before swine. You're right on your takes. Two wrongs don't make one right; someone was raped and that's a horrible thing to experience, but killing the baby that resulted don't result in justice being served. I agree the rapist should be punished, but death is too lenient. Force that person to work to death. Make him starve. Make him die of thirst. Impale him every night for ten years straight. Punishing the rapist DOES constitute justice. Killing the baby does not.

>>28163896
that's utilitarianism and it's a dead end retarded philosophy.

>>28164989
>>28165141
>christcucks rationalizing their cuckiness on a porn board
lmao

>>28164989
literally raising another man's child is being cucked

>>28164989
You're a cuck for letting a mythical creature walk you around on a fucking leash

File: 1720438284679200.gif (7 KB, 126x126)

7 KB GIF

>>28164214
It's not "baby killing" as babies and children exist only after birth. Women have the right to kill the thing you misname, though their mileage may vary depending on jurisdiction.

>>28163726
Enlightening

>>28165942
So you don't believe in A.I.?

>>28165475
>Raising another mans child is being cucked
Yeah all fathers who adopt children are cucks then I guess.

>>28165942
>You're a cuck for letting a mythical creature walk you around on a leash
Where do you get your morality from? Who holds your leash?

>>28166259
>babies only exist after birth
Porn brained pro aborts don't know the definition of cuck or God or baby for that matter, shocker. Do me a favour and google when a human life begins.

You can call me whatever you want to rationalize your inconsistent takes, but in this hypothetical, I want to give the child who had nothing to do with the rape a fighting chance in life. Damn sure better than killing them because I just don't want to look at them.

>>28165141
Thanks anon. The sower casts the seed indiscriminately, I do not know onto what kind of ground this seed will fall.

As far as death being too lenient: I'd rather send the rapist to God as soon as possible, what he does to them will be far worse than you or I could ever dream up.

>>28166259
>babies and children exist only after birth
life begins at the sperm and male masturbation is mass murder.
accept it.
move on.

selective interest based on political views is probably one of the gayest things you can do. if you've ever been with a woman, you would know that you can change her views on anything over time

>>28166259
>It's not "baby killing" as babies and children exist only after birth

You're of those disgenic libtard trannyfaggots mutts who support abortion up to the 9th month. Fuck you.

>>28164989
>>28164794
there's like 5 other fucking contraception methods other than abortion that would stop the pregnancy before it's even considered alive, why fucking carry it to term and have it carry the fucking burden of being an orphan and the child of a rapist? This is almost chris chan logic

>>28163726
> Samuel 15:3 (NIV): "Now go, attack the Amalekites and totally destroy all that belongs to them. Do not spare them; put to death men and women, children and infants, cattle and sheep, camels and donkeys."

>Joshua 6:21 (NIV): "They devoted the city to the Lord and destroyed with the sword every living thing in it—men and women, young and old, cattle, sheep and donkeys."

It's only okay when ((god)) does it.

>>28168294
>contraception
>stop the pregnancy

Do me a solid and google "contraception definition" and then google "methods of ending a pregnancy". Hell why don't you also search "when does human life begin".

Do a *tiny* bit of research before you spout off in public again.

>>28168306
>It's only ok when God does it

Yes Chad.jpg

God used the Israelites to destroy the Amalekites for their brutality and unwarranted attacks on Israel. They also were pagans who worshipped false gods. God is just, therefore so was his command to destroy them.

As for the city of Jericho, again, they deserved what they had coming. Full of debauchery, prostitution, and child sacrifice to Molech. The Israelites were commanded to purge the evil from the land.

>>28168349
God commands women to get an abortion. He has total authority over life and death, If He didn't want the fetus to be aborted, He wouldn't allow it to happen.

>>28167379
Nigga, adopting and raising a baby your wife got from being raped is two fucking different things.

>>28168349
>innocent children had it coming

christian morality on display everyone kek

>>28163726
abortion is a eugenic necessity and right wing concept

>>28163726
For me its:
>get horny
>open up porn site
>remember all the women in porn have taken enough miles of dick to round trip to the moon 10 times
>search for softcore porn instead
>coom

>>28165265
Man, to be honest, Christ can get fucked. So can Mohammed, Buda, Allah, Horus, Anubis. I'm not a religious person. I'm more of a rational person, and logic dictates that life begins at the time of conception because it can't begin at any other moment, thus "abortion" is just an euphemism for "murder". I'm sure you're one of those men that champion those feminist "causes" because it's the only way for you to get laid by a whore other than prostitution. I dare you to take a decent woman to bed; getting laid as a decent man is hard because it's hard to become a decent man. I really hope you become one. I hope you find purpose. I hope you marry a good woman and have a big family. I HOPE... but I don't really care. Toodles!

>>28168375
Still... This guy is arguing that killing a baby that's product of raping is morally wrong. And that's the right take. That baby had no part in it so it doesn't have to be punished either. I don't condone the abortion in that case, but I can understand the reasons behind it. Should the woman go through with the pregnancy and either keeps or gives the baby for adoption, would make her a saint, since THAT's the ultimate sacrifice. "Liberal" women want abortion not because they're being raped or there are medical complications; they want the fun without the sacrifice/responsibility, and that's being morally bankrupt.

>>28168340
>0-2 weeks no brain yet
No consciousness? No life
the brain is the seat of the soul

>>28168378

>Be God
>Create universe and everything in it
>Predestine and foreknow everything that will every happen because you exist outside of time and space and are all powerful and all knowing
>Command Israel to destroy some tribe cause they were literally sodomizing kids, burning them alive and eating their flesh in pagan worship to demons.
>internet atheist who literally continues to breath because you so will it:

"b..b.but the children!"

>>28168474

Your rationality depends entirely on an ordered universe with physical and metaphysical properties that are the same here as they are anywhere. To use rationality is to assume we live in a rational universe, something that can only be explained by a rational creator, who created rational beings capable of understanding themselves and the world.

Every knee shall bow man. Come to Christ.

>>28168596
>Be God
>kill children because angry and insecure

"but think of the fetuses!!!1! that haven't even developed yet"

>>28168596
>Every knee shall bow man. Come to Christ.

No one is going to bow to your stinky little jew on a stick. your religion is dying in europe for good

>>28168496
>No consciousness? No life

so if you were knocked unconscious you'd be fair game for murder? really smart take. Not to mention that babies at 0-2 weeks are very much alive, and human.

Unborn children in the womb are usually developmentally exactly where they should be at their age. In fact, the brain continues developing until you are 25 or so.

When is the soul imparted to the person?

>>28168596
answer>>28168372

>>28168496
That's a slippery slope buddy. You're arguing that if there's no brain, there's no life; not your smartest choice. Well, there IS a brain under development. It's not complete, true, but it IS there. So, the question becomes, how developed a brain has to be before it's considered "alive", or is it how much does it have to weigh? or is it about the capacity? How do you measure that? In number of neurons? What about retards and people with down syndrome? are they "less" alive? How about functional retards? are they "less" alive too? What if you're comatose, zero brain function, are you alive? No? Well, what if.... What if you go into a comma BUT everyone around you know your brain functions will return in, let's say in two weeks (just the time it takes from conception for the brain structures inside a fetus to begin to form), should we disconnect you? How about nine months?

You also say "consciousness", an even worse choice. You'll have to define what constitutes "consciousness" which is incredibly difficult. If you're unconscious because someone kicked you in the head, you're literally unconscious. By your own definition, you can be killed. Then you'll find other hurdles along the way that will inevitable lead you to conclude that defining "consciousness" is hard and you can't say that's the beginning of life.

>>28168596
Wrong. My rationale depends entirely on the world that we perceive through our senses AND the scientific experiments we can run that eliminate all bias our senses would infer to those observations. The argument about a creator, or the 'Designer' is weak. Take the electronic device you're using to read this. It's complicated, a human must have had designed it. That human is infinitely more complicated than a computer, someone or something must have had designed it. That designer is infinitely more complicated than the design. You can repeat this ad-nauseum. The 'Grand Designer' argument implies each creator requires a creator, extending that chain infinitely and you can't make a compelling argument on where to stop.

>>28168622
>>28168372

>God controls everything so nothing matters
>engages with person online in an attempt to change their mind

One can't live their life absolving themselves from any kind of choice. God created us as rational beings with decision making minds. He also gave us his will for us, that is, what he wants us to choose.

But ik you don't believe any of that, so don't use a bastardized version of my worldview to prove the validity of your own.

>>28168645
He has total authority over life and death, if God didn't want those fetuses to die then he wouldn't allow it. God loves abortion.

>>28168640

How do you know you can trust your senses? How do you know that the scientific experiments that you run will be repeatable and reliable tomorrow? How do you know that you will even be the same person you are today as you were yesterday? How do you determine or define abstract principles that transcend time and space, such as knowledge, morality, or the rules of logic when all you have to look at is the material world?

There must be an underpinning "Causer" for everything: God.

>>28164794
I hate women, but I hate kids more so I want there to be less of them, someone could like kids and want more of them. This is all a retarded emotional appeal to "save muh babies".

It's retarded and you wouldn't apply this logic to a single other one of your viewpoints. Purely for my own whims, I can decide to kill animals and eat them, there are alternative things I could eat instead, but I like the taste of meat, so I'm totally fine killing animals. I also love dogs, I would never kill and eat a dog, the idea of someone killing and eating a dog is pretty abhorrent to me, again, entirely because of whim.

Allowing the government to regulate either of these things, vegans preventing me from eating meat, or, me preventing someone from eating dogs, is absolutely not the governments place. It is, as you say, a societal problem. I think it's retarded that women "need" the right to have an abortion, but it's equally retarded to say the government should have any decision in the matter.

File: 1731664252120551.webm (434 KB, 480x480)

434 KB WEBM

>>28163726
Question anon: Say that you have a wife, and she was raped. She's now pregnant with the rapist's baby, and wants to keep it. You have the ability to change her mind either way. Do you make her abort the baby because its not yours? Or do you respect her wishes and let her keep it? Answer carefully now

>>28168645
>> But ik you don't believe any of that, so don't use a bastardized version of my worldview to prove the validity of your own.

Man, I'm sorry. Your world view allows to derive that logic. If you claim there's a higher entity that is all knowing, all powerful, and controls everything, from black holes to every sub atomic particle movement, then your claim includes him/her/it allowing for killing babies. He could stop it, but chooses not to. He could eradicate hunger in an instant, yet we have the fattest people in the world while other are scavenging their last meal.

Yeah, that's possible in your world view. Make no mistake, there's no bastardization there.

So this guy:
>>28168660
is essentially right.

>>28168681
That's the thing.. Nobody can. You can't possibly say without a shade of a doubt that a science discovery is the truth beyond any doubt. Every science discovery is only part of the truth. Newton's laws described movement, but Einstein showed us it's only a partial understanding of it. It's impossible to say the knowledge we have today is final in the same way it's impossible to claim the underpinning "causer" is god. I mean, you can utter those word, but as far as proving or disproving it, you can't. You can't even provide a partial knowledge beyond "There must/has to be one". That's just lazy

>>28168691
While I'm against governments, most humans are savages if left unchecked. Human created laws so we can live in a semi-civilized world where you have the freedom to be sitting your ass in your chair using your computer in (hopefully) your house, and there's a single shit no-one can do about it because there are laws that prevent your neighbor from cracking your skull with a baseball bat. While you love dogs, other cultures eat them. Being vegan is just plain stupid from any and all angles. However, government HAS a place from forbidding you from doing certain things. Riddle me this, if your body, your choice, why is it not legal for you to sell one of your kidneys? I'll tell you why, because the moment you allow people to sell their organs, then you entice your neighbor to knock you out, steal BOTH kidneys and leave you in an ice bath tub. You can make an argument that government goes too far sometimes, but I can make an argument too that you should be thankful it exists. Not banning abortions is only welcoming society to decadence. Also, please gtfo redditard. The spacing gives you away.

>>28168094
>anti-abortion retard talking about dysgenics
the absolute lack of self-awareness

File: pro-life.gif (3.36 MB, 480x560)

3.36 MB GIF

>>28168349
Based

>>28168886
nigger did you really format your post like this >>28164794 then claim reddit spacing? I've probably been here since before you were born, breaking up huge paragraphs of text into separate thoughts is something adults do.

In the subtext of my dog example is that it's a choice which to me is abhorrent, but ultimately, from a societal standpoint, has no impact on my life outside of disgust. All your examples are things which could have a substantive impact on my life, or, generally, the life of a thinking, choosing being. An unborn baby is not, especially in the first trimester, where 93% of abortions are performed.

>>28163726
Based

>>28168474
A rational person wouldn't be bitching about undesirables willfully terminating their own pregnancies and removing their genes from the gene pool. Without emotional appeal and religious guilt-tripping you'd have no argument against stuff like abortion and euthanasia. If you had to choose between saving a newborn child from getting murdered or 50 fetuses from abortion you'd choose the former, because your rational mind intrinsically knows it's the actual, fully formed human life, unlike the empty moralistic rhetoric you're parrotting from Christians would have us believe.

>>28163726
What exactly is your problem?

>>28168886
>>28168897
On a second thought, maybe banning abortions isn't a bad idea.

i have 34 threads currently hidden because if it has a penis in the thumbnail OR will show penis as it's main focus (ie - "hetero" thread) i hide it.
i wanna see chicks, not dicks.
simple as.

>>28169372
Why do you post like an effeminized social-media user?

Abortion is awesome. It's good for society and it's humane. Want to reduce abortion rates? Reduce pregnancy rates. Sex ed and contraception are the only things that do that effectively and you retards have always been firmly against those and are now dismantling the department of education. You people have no ethics or morals, you just want to force women to have children. This is a Christian/White nationalist psy-op. Always has been.

>>28168306
2 things to notice, retard:

1- You totally descontextualized those 2 verses.
2- we are God’s property, He can do whatever He wants with His creation.
>Cope/seethe/dilate all you need
>you'll never be a woman

>>28168812
>less than 1% of abortions are due to rape
jewish argumentation tactics

>>28169491
He will never be a woman but God will also never be real.

>>28169519
>murder is okay if it's less than 1% of the cases because i'm too much of a pussy to have an uncompromising stance on this issue

>>28167379
Why do you need a leash? Are you a dog?

>>28168306
The biblical God is okay with abortion ironically
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Agy88gCk1K0

>>28169540
You must be talking to someone else because I never said that. A kike like you is the one proposing indiscriminate killing of babies, because you are so worried about rape victims right?

>>28164794
>>28164264
>>28163896

I've seen the story of a woman who gave birth to her rapists baby and though as he grew older he did resemble him, she still loved her child as much as any mother and said she couldn't imagine a life without her child.
A terrible moment doesn't diminish the lifetime reward of having and raising a child. In the grand scheme it becomes absolutely insignificant.

>>28166259
You're the one doing the misnaming buddy.

>>28169558
>indiscriminate
Is there "discriminate" killing of babies, retard? Are you saying women who have been raped should be allowed to kill babies?

How am I supposed to combat self hate and thoughts of suicide?

>>28168886
By that logic banning abortions is enticing your neighbor to knock your wife up lol

>>28169491
"God" has total authority over life and death, If it didn't want the fetus to be aborted, it wouldn't allow it to happen.

Either God wants those disgusting little fuckers dead or your mythical fairy doesn't exist. Which is it chud?

>>28168812
question anon: A woman has sex, choosing to do so without using any of the dozen forms of birth control available, and gets pregnant. Should she be allowed to kill the baby because she's a stupid fucking whore? Answer carefully now.

>>28169585
>Should she be allowed to kill the baby because she's a stupid fucking whore?
Not him but yes. Too bad she chose otherwise and you were born.

File: 1731474143559910.webm (172 KB, 640x360)

172 KB WEBM

Someone found this disturbing.

>>28169576
Don't try to combat them, they feed on it.

>>28169591
Imagine if the Romans had that policy. None of the Abrahamic bullshit we see today would exist.

>>28168812
>>28169585
Note that this scenario accounts for more than 99% of abortions.
In studies about abortions and reasons for them, women would say things like it interferes with their schooling and such, so why would they have unprotected sex? (answer, because they care less about human life than their own selfish reasons and because abortion is made available as a fall-back to the ultimately stupid decision not to use any one of a dozen kinds of birth control)
The women who get abortions are absolutely stupid, vapid, unfeeling trash of a human being. In those same studies, some of them when asked about adoption literally answered this "more than one-third of interview respondents said they had considered adoption and concluded that it was a morally unconscionable option because giving one's child away is wrong."

... but killing the baby is morally fine.
Absolute, unfeeling evil.

>>28169589
>Not him but yes. Too bad she chose otherwise and you were born.
You're missing the point. In a society that has no consequences for idiotic, and evil decisions (DECISIONS!) there can be no hope.
You're as stupid as they come.

>>28169612
>"more than one-third of interview respondents said they had considered adoption and concluded that it was a morally unconscionable option because giving one's child away is wrong."

"Oh no, I could never give a child away... to a loving family that wants him and will take care of him to live a beautiful, fulfilling, loved life. Better to kill the child instead by tearing it limb from limb in my womb."

>>28169616
>idiotic, and evil decisions
Lol, the idiotic "evil" decision would be to force those people to give birth, you dumb fuck.

>>28169664
Everyone who supports the criminalization of abortions should be required by law to raise the babies that would've been aborted. Let's see how many are willing to adopt the spawns of niggers, rapists, and other genetic trash.

>>28169623
>to a loving family that wants him and will take care of him to live a beautiful, fulfilling, loved life
lmao

>>28169700
It never ceases to amaze me how disconnected from reality these religious retards are.

>>28169253
That was not me. And you should still go back to r3ddit with that liberal bs you're spreading. You've been here before I was born? Doubt it. The point I'm trying to make is that there are different sets of values across different cultures. Some eat dogs, some think cows are sacred, some think they talk to god on a two way radio, other think they're the god-chosen people; which is fine. Whatever crap they want to believe in, they can. It's subjective. It really depends on where you were born. If you were born in Iran, you'd be blowing yourself up for virgins. If you were born in asia, you'd never know what a medium rare steak tastes like, and would probably be dreaming of getting rammed by Subrahmanya's spear. If you were born in the US you're probably an atheist. Murder and assassination, on the other hand, are wrong across all cultures. You're really having a hard time figuring out where to draw the line on what means to be human/alive/conscious. That, OR, you're just trying (rather poorly imho) to be edgy. No-one really hates babies, there's no reason for it. They're a handful? Sure. Annoying? Hell yeah. If you tell me you hate humanity as a whole, I'd buy that, I root for the meteorite. I'm not too far of misanthropy myself... But to say you hate babies? Yeah, that's another whole level of psychopathy and you should seek help.
Try being edgy somewhere you can make sure you're the only adult.

The anti/pro lifer.

The chad 'what race is it'

>>28169710
>>28169700
nobody said anything about religion. you've obviously never met people who adopt kids. They spend a lot of time and money to be able to adopt, and the children end up in families that are dedicated to the raising of children. Your 15 your old self "lmao" contributes nothing to your opposition of the idea. You don't even know why you think the way you do. You're just a stupid young ignorant npc reacting the way your programmers told you you should, without knowing why.

>>28169688
everyone who supports whoring around unprotected, you mean. meaning people like you.

>>28169664
No it wouldn't. It would a perfectly reasonable progression of events according to the woman's poor decision. You're exactly the kind of beta simp that women rely on to protect them from the consequences of every bad decision they ever make in their lives. women are never held responsible for anything bad they do. (men on the other hand are instantly punished for these things, as they should be, because it's how civilization is built - that allows women to act so stupidly without consequences, supported by the weak men of society who are raised up alongside weak women by the strong men)

>>28164908
you alone could not sustain the amenities you enjoy daily.

>>28164908
Speak for yourself loser.

>>28168496
You're assuming consciousness only exists in the brain? How silly.

File: 1728917908900237.webm (3.88 MB, 720x406)

3.88 MB WEBM

based
jezebel don't even stand a chance.

File: 1730734056067960.webm (3.75 MB, 400x224)

3.75 MB WEBM

a word about despair

File: 1708510874532440.webm (3.74 MB, 1280x720)

3.74 MB WEBM

a word about temptation

>>28169807
Oops! it seems like you misread the post, you seem to have missed this part "All your examples are things which could have a substantive impact on my life, or, generally, the life of a thinking, choosing being. An unborn baby is not, especially in the first trimester, where 93% of abortions are performed."

File: 1709542995736739.webm (2.42 MB, 720x412)

2.42 MB WEBM

God forgives you anon
no matter what.

>>28168306
>any version besides KJ
Lol lmao

>>28169253
>has no impact
the normalization of baby killing affects all of society around you. People who are convinced something as demonic as casually killing babies is fine and normal have been conditioned to accept anything, including everything that does affect your life.
For example, compared to abortions, the storming of the borders by illegals and them killing a few of your own citizens is deemed insignificant by the same people, and people are conditioned to accept this. If your natural revulsion to baby killing can be suppressed, there's no reason why anything else that might affect you should be acted against. It's why governments for decades now have committed crimes, corruption, the rich gotten richer while the middle class move towards poverty, NSA spying on it's own citizens, injustices abound, and even though there have been a plethora of reasons and generations of torture and suppression through all these facets of life, with EVERY reason to rise up against and revolt, there has been no revolution. And there will not be, because evil, all these forms of it, are normalized and accepted, one by one. Unless you're a rich elite, you are a victim of it all.

Miserable hypocrites: the thread

>>28169895
>>28169896
You're so unworldly it's almost endearing.

>>28169910
Anon those people are the dregs of society, why the fuck would you want MORE of them leeching off taxpayers? Just because it's supposed to teach the whore a lesson about the consequences of one's actions? If anything those people should be sterilized, but that's unrealistic. So allowing them to exclude their shitty genes from the population is the second best option. Unless you think dumb whores are somehow going to raise strong men and chaste women instead of just more copies of themselves, in which case you're retarded beyond saving, then you should want them to have as many abortions as they can.

nice "lighthouse", you fucking cocksuckers, thanks
look at what your efforts amount to, it's just twitter

>>28169612
>The women who get abortions are absolutely stupid, vapid, unfeeling trash of a human being
The problem is actively trying to solve itself and here you are being a low IQ moralfaggot who should've been aborted as well.

>>28168842
It's me, reddit spacing retard from before. text walls are annoying, sue me.

IF there was a God who is as I say, all powerful, fully in control, and all knowing, what right would you have to question the morality of his actions?

I believe that God is the determiner of all that is morally good, and yet at the same time allows for free will and choice. His actions are beyond your understanding, therefore if God so desires to kill perceived innocent children, yet commands us to love our neighbour as ourself, love our enemies, protect the fatherless and the oppressed, we must try to obey his decrees, without accusing him of hypocrisy. It's a bit like a dog calling his master a hypocrite for eating chocolate when the dog is told he can't. The dog doesn't understand the first thing about nutrition and yet he's calling his master, the man who feeds him good food every day, a hypocrite.

You can't help but strawman my position when you make the "if he could he would" argument.

>>28168850

I'm not trying to prove the existence of God, I'm saying our universe is a part of the evidence for his existence. "The heavens declare the glory of God", and "For since the creation of the world God’s invisible qualities—his eternal power and divine nature—have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that people are without excuse."

This universe needs an explanation, and the real intellectual laziness is the refusal to acknowledge that there can only be one cause because "scientific discoveries can't be known as the truth"

>>28163726
dear diary

>>28170490
you really don't see reality, anon.
go outside.

>>28171084
>intellectual laziness
God of the gaps is lazy. God is not well defined and not falsifiable.

>our universe is a part of the evidence for his existence
This means absolutely nothing. Big fucking essay and nothing but hollow rhetoric.

>>28171185
>God is not well defined and not falsifiable
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%27s_ontological_proof#:~:text=It%20defines%20God%20as%20the,be%20the%20essence%20of%20God.

>>28170490
You're painfully ignorant. Just projecting and lying by calling me what you actually are is also not an argument. Are you going to make one or continue to show how stupid you are?

File: reaction.gif (3.05 MB, 498x275)

3.05 MB GIF

>>28163726
>>get horny
>>open up porn site
>>remember all the women in porn support abortion
>>close porn site
>>make a thread on the porn board about babby's first existential crisis

File: related.webm (2.31 MB, 1280x720)

2.31 MB WEBM

>get anti-horny
>open up anti-porn thread
>remember all the times OP was a faggot
>close thread
This post is your lighthouse

>>28171305
>porn board

i just fap because im bored and its one of the only things that give me any joy in this life.

i am in favor of abortion because that means aborting nigger babies. how can you be against that?

>>28164214
it's a stolen opportunity from a man who deserves it. Rape babies are more likely to have STDs, abandon their own children, and rape others, because they are born fatherless victims. Raising a rape baby is traumatic and dangerous, and if we facilitate it, we're creating handouts for criminals

>>28163726
People will call you a poser, but I do believe that us, as men, our struggling through the many ordeals of modern society. We have our needs, our cravings, much like any other species, but what is given to us also brings its fair share of impurity and corruption.

>>28170363
Russell Brand the accused rapist who suddenly found God the absolute split second the accusations were made public?

>>28171084
Fine, let's space it.

The fact you prefaced the longest paragraph with

>> I believe . . .

Then followed it with

>> beyond your understanding. . .

Tells me there's no reason why we should continue this argument. You're a man of beliefs, I'm a man of facts.

As far as laziness goes, yeah, the 'Creator' argument is the laziest. Neptune was a lazy way to describe tides. Zeus, thunder. Aeolos, wind. Anything we couldn't describe or explain: "It must be a higher power". Keep in mind there are numerous instances where natural phenomena that previously had been attributed to 'gods' have been described and explained (to a 'good enough' extent) by science. There isn't a single scientific discovery that was explained first by the scientific method, that better explained by the 'creator' argument.

Arguments like 'God exists because our existence proves it" it's the closest to a logical fallacy you can get. It's begging the question. "The universe exists because god exists, because god created the universe" is circular logic. The conclusion is within the premise. It also is a non-sequitur: "The fact that we exist, it proof god exists" where the conclusion does not follow the premise. You shouldn't be using that "proof" in debates; but I guess in this board that's ok.

Anyway, you do you, man. Your beliefs allow for a god that allows babies to be killed, and bad stuff happen to good people. It just does. Shrouding in mystery saying "we can't understand him/her" is laziest laziness in the history of laziness.

I'm going to quit our argument here because there's no logical argument I can use to debate a person that has abandoned all logic.

>>28163726
song?

>>28163726
If this is your life, western civilization is cooked.

>>28171184
>>28171259
And then all the unwanted rape babies and casual sex babies put up for adoption were successfully adopted by loving families and lived happily ever after.

The end.

>>28171084
>IF there was a God who is as I say, all powerful, fully in control, and all knowing, what right would you have to question the morality of his actions?

If god is all knowing then he would know everything that we were going to from the moment we were conceived, so it's his own fault for creating us. Free will and omnipotence aren't compatible.

Fetuses are not sentience, thus do not experience any suffering or pain for being terminated. Similar to a vegetable.

>>28172064
the accusations that arose about an alleged incident years prior, presented with zero evidence, and appeared as soon as he became a dissident figured.

>>28172962
Your first rebuttal is not bad. One can still poke holes in the second one. You'll have to define sentience and account for all the time you're not fully awake or conscious, like when undergoing surgery, if someone dismembered you, you wouldn't experience any suffering or pain for being terminated. Similar to a vegetable