>>28365817
>>28365822
>>28365826
>movie maker trialDid a broke ass mexican make this shit?
>>28365927but movie maker cost like 300 pesos
>>28365817>>28365822Openshot or Shotcut are free anon.
>>28365817bruh just use shotcut
>>28365817name?
>>28365979Absolutely revolting
>>28365817Are there still big titty thirst traps posting in tiktok? I thought they got rid of most of them.
>>28365817Who is this? How can I make my tiktok algorithm more purely coombait?
>>28366306Alice delish
>>28366219>>28366234Thanks Anon.Looks better now
>>28366802now increase your bitrate so its as close to the 4mb limit as possible
>>28366359why does she kind of look like paul mccartney
>>28365979this wouldn't be so bad if she showed her giant tits
>>28365826who is this succubus
>>28366480I think they've made it harder to just be cumbait in america because my us friends were complaining about not being able to, even with a new accountin my country it's extremely easy just follow girls that upload that and like the tiktoks of girls dancing and stuff and soon all the algorithm feeds you is young girls with few small clothes dancing
hotblockchain
>>28365817goonbunny-bait
>>28367968buckets for this random fully clothed white woman. no sauce required
>>28368178she has naked vids her tits fkn nicccccccce
>>28366480Who’s this?
>>28365829why bother with her tiktoks when she has onlyfans lmao
>>28366802>>28366834he could make it minute long with the same quality, if he wasn't retarded
>>28367475what accounts do you follow for this?
>>28367473jane_soul_liffe
Anyone know who this is? Have been searching for a while
>>28368214You can't just say that and not say where to find her
>>28368205love this whore
Some anon posted a mega full of milkhater05/dolllyfied stuff not so long agoDoes anybody have it?
>>28368647I've seen this one and it looks like same girl, but the account that posted it is not her.https://www.redgifs.com/watch/excitablepushytamarinof course maybe I'm fucking face blind
>>28366834Thanks. It worked>>28368311Shut up or tell me how
>>28369888don't listen to the other guy, higher bitrate is more important than longer videos, since you can compensate for shorter videos by stringing a bunch up but you can never compensate for pixely low bitrate videos
>>28369938Thanks for the advice once again anon. I'm really new to this stuff.Does changing formats help? It seemed that I get cheaper file size using webm v9 instead of just webm
>>28369968vp9 is currently the best way to encode
>>28365979Lmao
>>28370385that's a lot more movement than I'd expect
>>28369968yes VP9 will yield a much better quality to filesize ratio, but it does take a little longer
