NEW adult women wearing diapersprevious thread>>2572609
anyone here managed to convince a vanilla partner to be ok with this? heck, at this time of my life, I am just happy for them to be accepting and supportive as a non-participant of any of it, I just dont want to think someone I love resents me for something I cannot control
Wish I had the courage to bring this up to a partner, seems simple enough to lead into it from a piss kink or a clothing fetish
>>2581651>>2581652why do the faces look off here
Women belong in diapers
>>2581647Yes, I have! I've gotten three girlfriends (including my current wife). Very lucky!
>>2581647>wear almost 24/7>have been LE EBIN CAUGHT LOLLL >never embarrassingI feel like either it's become a normie fetish and nobody cares, or people can tell and make other assumptions have better things to care about. I dunno about a partner being into it, but the random barfly friends I've made certainly don't seem to care and there's other better reasons we don't bang.
asian in a diaper pls
>>2581651Ha, looks like she crapped herself
>>2582213Maybe she did!
>>2582212she is asian, she just covers her silly baby face
I remember this image being part of a set where she messed herself, heavily. Anyone have it?
>>2581825Its a mistake to ever potty train them tbqh
>>2582645Honestly though
>>2582563Charlotte is sooo fucking cute.
I remember someone posting about the dangers of catheters trying to discourage other people from using them, now my question is, could I wear something like this to help me to wet more easily without fucking me up badly since it significantly shorter/smaller than an actual cath? 5mm width and 55mm long
>>2582755fucking hell she's beautiful
>>2582808yep
>>2582818
>>2582819
>>2582820
>>2582807Relevant post (check the replies): >>2573668It's pretty much the same as with a catheter, albeit a bit more dangerous in my opinion, as it's not releasing pressure on its own if really needed and keeping it sterile will be more difficult and much more important. The "outside" tip of the sound should be bigger than the part that goes inside, just so it doesn't slip in uncontrolled and cause damage. In general I'd say yes to whether it can have an effect on wetting. Short-term it won't do much, but with frequent long-term wear, it will cause (some) incontinence just like catheters can do. I did a quick google search: catheters remove the body's need to use the bladder's sphincter and react to pressure in the bladder).Further, it sets the resting position of the bladder's sphincters to be slightly open, just like you can see how anal play can cause (short-term) gaping and general difficulty staying closed (especially with pressure from the inside). You can train your ass, yes, but the longer and more frequently it stays forced open, the more severe the effects.If taken to the extreme, it will lead to incontinence, especially if something is damaged.
>>2582871Anal causes incontinence
>>2582645And to trick them into ever wanting to give up that adorable padding between their legs? All in the name of being a "big girl"?It is a massive mistake.
>>2582808She needs more topless photos.
>>2582942
>>2582942>>2582944>>2582945>>2582946its weird for me because the fact that they put so much effort not only into doing diaper porn but also do blogs and act silly going on trips, camping, amusement parks kind of tricks my brain into normalizing being ABDL as something a hot chick like Charlotte could be into and then facing that dissonance with reality really fucks me up inside anons, I wish I could just be a fucking normie
>>2582955The purpose of the diaper psyop is to cause confusion
>>2582966but why?
>>2582970cool it with the antisemitism
>>2583012this kind of thing is not cool though, they should blur the people not participating in this shit
aiee
>>2583269That's a guy.
>>2583270Oh no!!
>>2583271Read the board rules retard.
>>2583346Kek
>>2582941We joke, but honestly most women act childish. And I don't mean like they're irrational, I mean I've seen even very professional women go full cutesy baby talk mode with their boyfriends and demand "uppies" and to be cared for like an infant.I think a lot of women obviously enjoy the thrill of being sexually attractive and put a lot of effort into mature shit around that like makeup and dressing slutty, but deep down many would probably prefer to be diapered if they didn't have a societal ick around the concept
>>2583538
>>2583498For all the joking, there's a grain of truth here. Women do like to be childish at times. But some baby talk with a boyfriend or some playful pouting is a far cry from wearing diapers.So how do you close that gap? How do you overcome the ick and convince her to take the diaper pill?>many would probably prefer to be diaperedThis is a big stretch. I think some can be brought around to the idea of wearing occasionally, but not much more than that.
>>2583704Nah man. Women are like the most socially malleable creatures in existence. And in evolutionary terms it makes sense. While males of the species are rewarded for taking risks and exploring new opportunities for resources etc, women ensure their survival by conformity to a group. It's the same reason women's IQ clusters around the average and men's has more extremes of both the highest and lowest IQ.All it would take for millions of women to be into diapers is for it to be more socially valuable.As it is, wearing diapers is embarrassing and would tend to lower a person's social status so a minority of women are into it.On other boards, over the years, we've had hundreds of threads about imagining fiction in which fetishes become globalized, and a common trend among the fiction relating to women in diapers is the idea that wearing diapers becomes a high status thing to do. Poor or ugly women have to drag themselves to the toilet like a man, but valuable women get pampered (pun intended).And I think there's something to that.Throughout history some really bizarre things have become a sign of status just because of the particular conditions. Like for a time, being very pale was a high status thing, and it's why in Europe there is a phrase about being "blue blooded" because the aristocracy would have the luxury of spending so much time inside that you could see their blue veins through their skin. Meanwhile the peasantry had to toil in the fields and become very sun-weatheredBut now the inverse is true. People working a typical 9-5 spend all day inside, and you're most likely to tan if you went on vacation, which is a luxury thing to do, so being tanned is more valuable and women will even use fake tan to achieve that look
>>2583716Someone should just tell them how expensive diapers are. 50bux for a pack of cutesy knockoff hello kitty diapers and they'll all wear them just to flex on poors.
>>2581641This is basically a subset of the big ass fetish if they wear clothes over the adult diapers
>>2583839Based
>>2582181When do you tell them?
>>2583716Surprisingly insightful post for a thread like this
>>2583716Off topic but Apple's gotta be pushing 40 or something, right?
>>2583976I think so yeah, Its crazy to think that, I was part of some sort of a abdl social media which I dont even remember the name, a looooooooooooong time before fake abdl facebooks popped like crazy trying to scam desperate coomer brains. This one definitely had its quota of that, and some even real caregives here and there.I stumbled upon Apple's profile and it was insane the level of detail, quality of pictures, the full on nursery she had set up. She was properly living the dream most of us only thought possible in actual dreams. I don't know if it was always her goal to start making content but god damn it was a good call. I kind of understand why she went with the name ABDreams, it was basically that. I remember I would read through her profile and try to interact with her in the least thirsty way possible but probably she was being bombarded by heaaaaaaaaaaaps of people constantly it was without a doubt a gem among the constant crotch selfies of hairy fatsos everywhere. I think its been 10? maybe 15 years? fucking hell, its crazy how time flies
>>2583976Good. More milfs in diapers.
>>2583976The oldest ones of you here might remember the time when Felicity was the go to, perfect ABDL girl, both smol and cute from AB SourceApple, alongside her crew, sort of became a representative of the newer generation of ABDL online models out there, accessorizing more, using a different style in babyish clothes with pastel color hues but not to the ridiculous and exagerated toys or clothes or overall tone that sometimes AB Source had.I wonder if now LNGU are the one pushing the content forward, not only delving more in sexy but whacky video productions, more stoye driven content, also doing a lot more vlogging and regular day to day content to keep people engaged in social media and give a sense of normality and just plain "normal girl but kinky vibe" in hopes of hooking more people in their fanbase.What might be the next step in the evolution of kink content creation I wonder? inviting people to participate and engage with them when creating content? trading videos for more engagement? one thing is true, the more and more artists and studios pop up, the more fierce the competition will become and we the consoomers will be on the winning side for sure.
>>2584026F
>>2583976>>2584010I wasn't always the biggest fan of her work, but I have come to appreciate her a lot over the years. It's wild following this 'scene' as long as I/we have you see random trends or people pop up and capture the interest for a bit then disappear after a year or so. Always wonder if it was just a quick buck or they were scared away. So many "flash in the pan" types. But then one's like Apple remain and you can only appreciate them for staying and continuing to provide good content! I remember getting started on WetSet way back in the day and it's remarkable to see where we're at now. High quality, very niche, and very attractive women in it. Wasn't always the case! I remember one of the first times I saw "HD" quality diaper pics from some random chick on Tumblr and was blown away. I wish I could remember her name, it's somewhere buried deep in my hard-drive.
>>2584146i'm young enough that i remember deeker but as a groomed yough, who this bitch is
>>2583716This is a surprising well thought out post lol.So I agree. In spirit at least. The easiest way to solve the current energy crisis is to "just" crack nuclear fusion. Just make wearing diapers something that gets you ahead in life. Nuclear fusion is more attainable than convincing millions of men to date based on the potty training status of their date, and for it to matter enough that it convinces a lot of women that wearing diapers is something that will get them ahead in life. Globalized fetish thread or not, I don't think that point is possible to reach.I think the easiest (and more realistic) way to get a diaperwife is to convince a vanilla they aren't icky, instead of convincing the world that diapers aren't icky. Because with every vanilla whose opinion of diapers improves, and who no longer feels shame or embarrassment over wearing them, it ever-so-slightly reduces to social cost associated with wearing. I don't see them ever becoming a "high status" thing, or a net social boon, but at least the stigma against wearing diapers can be reduced.Your observation about women being pretty conformist is pretty spot-on, though. In theory, if diapers = good, women would, by and large, voluntarily fall in line.
just ordered kiddo premium night bag everyone is so hyped about and I am glad I am going to get to try them but also...I feel it does fall under that umbrella of adorable paraphernalia of thing that I cannot fully enjoy by myself without someone else being around and telling me I look like cute toddlerits all so tiresome diaperbros
