Previous: >>2581641Adult women wearing diapers. Posting trannies is not just off topic for the thread, it's against the rules of /hc/.You buy any accessories for this fetish lately?
Will test next week
>>2590545You forgot And it’s disgusting
>>2590558Is that Sophie? Got any more of her?
>>2590553Keep us updated anon <3
What is your favorite diapers? My top three are Tena Max, ABU Bunnies, and Tykeables Overnights.
>>2590629More scotty
>>2590618Tykables were the best capacity and best feeling when wet I ever had, but I don’t like their patterns or the feel of their plasticBarnyards are the best fit and balance of feel, capacity and design I’ve hadBut I just buy ABUs now even though I don’t think their capacity or fit is the best. Don’t have to have them imported. Probably the best prints out there now with Alphagatorz and Little Kings at least.
>>2590545
>>2590618For sheer absorbency, Northshore Mega Max. For looks, pretty much anything from Bambino, or ABU. Unfortunately one of my favorite diapers of all time, DC Amours, are no longer made. They were so cute and crinkly.
>>2590692
>>2590601
>>2590733Jesus Christ, she looks so unhappy. Someone must have paid her to do this.
>>2590887Doubt it, very amateur photo. Some bitches just don't know to smile
>>2590890Only fans exists
she was cute
>>2590999>19 years ago
>>2591091Those can barely even be called diapers
>>2591081>>2590999Bruh I was four years old when that was made. She’s probably like pushing 40 now.
>>2591120Don't forget where you come from zoomer. I'm like 12 years older than you and people were making super cute diaper porn before I was born too.
>>2591123We vintage now?
>>2591182Damn, got anymore of her/this set?>>2591184Ahhh, Heidi from Bytemine.
>>2591187>Damn, got anymore of her/this set?NoCrazy how far back this fetish goes though
>>2591195It's been around for a while. There's a little bit of stuff like this from older vintage porn mags and stuff like this.We live in a very anti-sex, and anti-porn time period right now. But if that ever shifts around again I hope that ABDL can hit the mainstream a little bit more, the way that BDSM kinda has.
>>2590887is abdlgwen the hottest women in the fetish currently? I know she only shows half her face so it's a bit like cheating, but she has it all. Great body, nice hair, good (fake tits), enough wealth to be clean, and seems to genuinely like diapers. I bet she/he has a good job too.
>>2590737source?
>>2591273I feel like we would still need to see her face to verify. But yeah, she's the only one who's like... supermodel level.
>>2591258>We live in a very anti-sex, and anti-porn time period right nowI feel like we actually live during an all time high for pornography consumption and sex-toy purchase, but go off king.
>>2591387Quantity is high, quality low.
>>2591274I think I grabbed it off of ABKingdom. I've never seen any other pics of her besides this one. I hate when I find an incredibly hot pic or vid and then never see that person pop up again.
>>2591276There’s a girl who used to hide her face because she had a literal deformity, some genetic condition. Her body was just as hot. I’m willing to assume not showing your face in something like this isn’t purely for anonymity. Plus I don’t like the section I can see desu. Looks heavy jawed
>>2591453Just following up on your pic, anon. Christ, this girl is beautiful.
>>2591182I really miss vintage Attends/Depends. They used to be so much better. Softer, crinklier, thicker......that's one thing you notice when you see vintage pics where models are wearing disposables from the time. They look so much "poofier".
>>2591465
>>2591464She looks miserable Eastern European
>>2591467Nah it's an incredibly angloid phenotype
>>2591467Maybe she's upset because she has a massive load of shit in her diaper.
>>2591468Literally has the polish potato face of fellow low level wagie females in my workplace
>>2591468Model is "Baby Em" and is British, as you suspect.She was on uk diaper girls, and though she is gorgeous, most of the photos were pretty badly taken. It was a different time, I suppose.
>>2591515Early-2000's ABDL stuff is really interesting in the sense that there was an explosion of amateur sites that were all trying to sell their own take on what made the kink appealing. You had the "legacy" sites like Adult Baby Source and Bytemine who took more of a "magazine" approach to their photo shoots, where the pics are mostly staged and professional looking. Then you have sites like Aunt Elli that were largely candid, caught-in-the-moment looking photos. UK Diaper girls was somewhere in between, but I think my favorite from the era was Diapergal. Their models were always pretty and they all seemed to at least be amused by the idea of wearing and using diapers, if not entirely into ABDL.
>>2591276>>2591444NGL they do it for a reason. There were a few on Reddit who showed only body and once you saw their face they dropped from that 9/10 to 7/8 range. She might be the same. Still her pictures and body are top notch and not something we should take for granted. I wonder if anyone has seen her face.
>>2591395Compared to what I grew up with in the early 00s we're in a fucking golden age. People just need to stop being lazy and posting the same 100 pics on these type of threads. >>2591466This is the type of stuff we used to get. Some random bloke convinced his gal to wear one and take some pics then they work their way online. The rest of thsi set is pretty good iirc, pretty sure there's a big load in there!
does anyone have that photo of 4 women staring at you with the caption "are you a bad enough dude to diaper 4 women?" or something to that effect
>>2591387>I feel like we actually live during an all time high for pornography consumption and sex-toy purchase, but go off king.If you're talking about how there's an insane amount of women out there with OnlyFans nowadays you're right, but the way this stuff gets talked about and the spaces it can be shared are shrinking. Also, if you're talking about this fetish specifically? I think it's def gotten way worse. The UK is talking about strict porn bans, and stricter crackdowns on fetish content, specifically including this fetish. Same thing happening in the US. Besides twitter and 4chan where can you talk about fetish porn online anyway? It's impossible on any other social media platforms (maybe tumblr will come back) and forums where people share files have dried up.I could be wrong, but the way people talk about porn and sex nowadays seems so weird compared to twenty years ago. Porn was never 'mainstream' but it used to just be an open secret that everyone looked at it, and fetish porn was seen as 'weird' but not something that people would freak out about. Now people really do unironically want to ban porn, on both sides of the political aisle, and it worries me.It's not seen as cheeky fun anymore. It's seen as dangerous. There was talk about how TV censors don't allow people (adults or otherwise) to be depicted in diapers on TV anymore because they don't want that content to be considered fetish-bait.Porn producers on twitter have mentioned that if they approach models about doing shoots with diapers they get shot down and called pedos. Whereas people have been getting vanilla models to do this stuff for decades.Everything's on JFF now specifically because the people making this content can't get away with it anywhere else. OnlyFans banned it, Fansly banned it. JFF doesn't even allow stuff like messing, and may crack down even more in the future. The clips sites like ManyVids and Clips4Sale are removing more and more ABDL content all the time too.
>>2591395>>2591529>Compared to what I grew up with in the early 00s we're in a fucking golden age. People just need to stop being lazy and posting the same 100 pics on these type of threads.I assume we're close to the same age but I think you're actually hitting on the problem. The reason so much of this stuff looks the same or you see the same stuff over and over is because there's a lot of stuff out there but it's all so goddamn similar.It's the transition from paysites and professional models to individual girls making stuff on their own accounts. Besides just the fact that file sharing is way more dead and more difficult to do than it used to be, so much of the stuff is behind paywalls. And even if it could be downloaded too much of the content is similar to really entice anyone.Man, I miss sets and bad acting. Literally all the content out there now is a girl alone in her apartment pissing herself with no dialogue.I know it makes sense. It's all these girls filming themselves. There's no cameramen. There's no producers.I mean, isn't it weird how it's now so rare to even see content where there's multiple girls in the same pic or vid unless you're talking about ABDreams or FRDiapergirls?The fact that the OnlyFans model took over the porn industry might mean we technically got more diapergirls making content, but many of them are not ones I even want to look at, and the content they're making is so boring for the most part.
>>2591529>>2591545I know this is just a combination of nostalgia and wishful thinking but it felt like the 2000s and early 2010s really did have this brief moment where a huge amount of people were 1. Discovering this stuff through the internet, 2. Sexually open enough to think that dabbling in fetish content like diapers was ok, and 3. Still directed by traditional porn production values that some really cool stuff was getting made and the quantity was ramping up. Tumblr had so much amateur content too.It really feels like if the timeline had just been slightly different we could have gotten both quantity AND quality in the modern day. But alas, we have to just make do with the JFF models pissing themselves alone with no dialogue.
>>2591547>Still directed by traditional porn production values that some really cool stuff was getting made and the quantity was ramping upEven by the late 90's, people already seemed to think that there was a market for high-quality ABDL porn/erotica. "Couche!" magazine for example was a short-lived but adventurous foray into producing high quality ABDL content in print form. I can imagine the cost of starting a magazine back then was prohibitive and I think they only made it a few issues before folding. I admire them for trying, though.
>>2591573
>>2591573Not gonna post the entire issue, but you get the idea......
>>2591541>Besides twitter and 4chan where can you talk about fetish porn online anyway?Something like half of reddit is fetish subreddits
>>2591573>I can imagine the cost of starting a magazine back then was prohibitiveNo it was literally the exact opposite. Magazines were the equivalent of online forums back then in more ways than one.I'd recommend watching Fredrick Knudsen's video on furries. The entire furry community basically originates from "Funny Animal" magazines where people parodied Disney and other cartoons by drawing animal characters doing inappropriate things, and then once they started drawing them sexy the rest is history.It cost fucking nothing back in the day to publish a magazine.
>>2591663Interesting insight. Thank you, anon.
>>2591541>Porn was never 'mainstream' but it used to just be an open secret that everyone looked at it, and fetish porn was seen as 'weird' but not something that people would freak out about. Now people really do unironically want to ban porn, on both sides of the political aisle, and it worries me.>It's not seen as cheeky fun anymore. It's seen as dangerous. There was talk about how TV censors don't allow people (adults or otherwise) to be depicted in diapers on TV anymore because they don't want that content to be considered fetish-bait.Partially because of all the people who got exposed as abusers, with whatever fetishy stuff getting put in getting hit in the crossfire. Chris Savino harrassing coworkers while putting nosebleeds and diaper stuff in the Loud House. Dan "Feet" Schnider. Pornhub apparently not taking down minor abuse and keeping outright sexual battery vids up. Ron Jeremy getting outed as a rapist. Famous legend people getting exposed - Neil Gaiman, Bill Cosby roofieing, Shayy's 262 pages of doom, etc. People feel like they can't trust anyone and need something to blame.Not helping this is the Far Left's SJWs crying rape about everything, the "anti"s in fandom running amok and the stupid culture battles (SHE WAS 30 YEARS OLD YOU SICK FUCK, "Saturn Return", etc), the Right increasingly lockstep behind both Donald J Epstein and outright demanding the end of womens' rights and legalizing rape while crying GROOMER DEGENERACY towards anything they don't understand or can't tolerate. The lockdowns basically destroyed peoples brains too, they were faced with an existential crisis for maybe the first time in their lives coupled with the shit handling of the pandemic by both the Trump Administration and the CDC's nonsense response to the former and what not. So isolated for months, they got radicalized by human traffickers like Tate. This is an era of terror and bad faith, don't see it improving soon.
>>2591545You know that's a good point about the "individuality" of the creator (and even the consumer). I still disagree somewhat and would believe the upsides outweigh the downsides, if there were demand for that stuff it'd be getting made. Right? There's still some multi-girl pics and posters. SophieLittle has her gang of diapered gals. Just the amount of people in the fetish, the quality of the pics/vids, and the fact so many of them are actually incredibly attractive puts it in a better place for me. I can go on reddit and get a couple of gifs or pics in 4k quality in ways I couldn't before. It's awesome. Not to mention the diapers available now! It was basically pullups or bambinos for the longest time. And of course society seems a lot more tolerant towards fetishes/kinks than it was 25 years ago. We're certainly in a better spot culturally. I do miss places like WetSet or such with long-lasting communities. That is something growing up you'd get to know and there was this sense of community for lack of better word. These threads don't quite hit the same way. There's very little sense of we're all in this together stuff. But I think that's more how the internet and society has changed rather than the actual fetish itself. I don't think it's perfect, but we're definitely in a really good place.
>>2591541I think that banning or regression is certainly a concern, but I don't think they're going to send us back to the dark-ages. And you think porn is less socially acceptable now than previously? I find that to be completely opposite. There was reason it had to be an "open-secret", today it's just accepted. If anything people are too normalized and exposed leading to some perhaps pushback. Based off places like Reddit I think kinks are lot more normal and it's something a lot people realize they have and consider when dating and make it a part of them. I really just disagree that it's less socially acceptable than it was 25 years ago. I mean, when I was kid being gay was criminal in some areas. Lawrence v Texas was only in 2003! There are worrying signs, but nothing that I think takes us back further than we came. However, be ever vigilant!
>>2591728>and diaper stuff in the Loud House?
>>2591573where can i get this?
>>2591663>It cost fucking nothing back in the day to publish a magazine.As someone who was into zines, a full magazine was prohibitively expensive.
>>2591661True but have you tried any of the ABDL subreddits? The conversation on r/abdl sucks. There are some girls who exclusively post on reddit though so that's kinda cool.>>2591728Thank you for admitting it's both sides politically that are doing this. The right always blames the feminists and the left always blames the christo-fascists, and nobody wants to admit it's two sides of the same coin and causing the same problems.>>2591757Upsides and downsides, I admit, but I don't think we're in a good place and I don't really think it's getting better. The one thing that I want to address though is that there is absolutely demand for different kinds of stuff in this fetish, but it's not getting made, not out of lack of demand, it's just so hard to make in the current climate. Where would they sell it? It's so hard to monetize this stuff nowadays. Maybe it's the government and the economy that's more to blame for the current state of things than the current community, but despite the number of people who are finding this fetish and posting stuff online, it feels like outside of the bubble of this kink, the overall attitude in society is way more sex-negative than it used to be.>>2591764I agree. I think it's more just like I said in a previous post that I feel like we were so close to a golden age but then missed the mark. And I do think that the way we talk about this stuff needs to shift. IDK. Maybe I just spend too much time on twitter, but the very fact that you do think porn and sexuality is overexposed seems to feed into the wrong narratives.I still believe sexuality used to be much more open. Specifically sexual imagery meant to appeal to heterosexual males. Look at advertising and media from the 80,90s,00s, etc. Putting attractive women in situations was the accepted norm at the time. Much rarer to see that in the current cultural climate.>>2591801You might be able to find some scans online but like actual print issues? Good luck.
>>2591801Probably almost impossible to find hard copies. This was a very limited run magazine. I don't even remember where I found the scans that I did, as I've had them forever. You might try a reverse image search to see if you can find the entire issue. I think they only published two issues before they went out of business.
>>2591806Your pic inspired me to post one of my favorite Bytemine girls, Erin.
>>2591808I love the vintage turn this thread has taken.
>>2591809I'm over it to be honest. It's neat that this fetish was a thing so long ago, but the pics all look pretty samey, limited by the resources of the time.>woman>just an ordinary room>couple toys here and there>wearing cloth diapers>plastic pantsCompare that to modern stuff when there's dozens of different diaper designs, bitches build entire nurseries, take photos outside, have some adult sized props like cribs and highchairs etc
would love to find out who this is
>>2591908I think this is the same girl too, but it's hard to tell
>>2591806Where would they sell? It's never been easier to monetize niche fetishes. The prevalence of OF, JFF, and even Scatbook demonstrate that. It's undeniable that it is far far far easier for a solo creator to make money, even as a side gig. Not to mention the digital platforms and social media taht allow you to engage with fans and market. You (or someone) mentioned your magazine , Couche. Most people never even heard of it because it's impossible to know of pre-social media. I'm sorry, but if you're discounting how much easier it is to monetize your stuff today and thinks its harder idk what to tell you. Back in the 90s you'd have to run a website or create something. That is not an easy process! Now you just sign on one of these sites, pay a small fee or percentage, and post what you want when you want. The sheer number of people doing this shows how much easier it is to monetize. I'm not trying to belittle or even really argue, but honestly it's far easier. As for sex-negative, compared to when? When I grew up in the 90s/00s it's certainly more accepting. I do think in the wake of "Me Too" society has become more sex-negative (especially Gen-Z), but I still don't think we're nearing the levels where when I grew up. I just don't, that's my experience and I'm sure you could find stats to support it.
>>2591806>I still believe sexuality used to be much more open.You can literally find diaper girls on youtube talking about pissing themselves. Don't know how it gets more open than that.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_q4RIZU9bwhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vtR_R-q0zbY
>>2591573bro has never heard of a zine. up until the 00s people were printing these shits like fiat money, quality paper and color printers got REAL cheap for a while
>>2591975>The prevalence of OF, JFF, and even Scatbook demonstrate that.When it comes to this kink, JFF is the only option and they don't allow messing and are possibly going to get more restrictive in the future. OF banned it. Fansly banned it. ManyVids banned it. Clips4Sale still has ABDL content but it's on the way out. Scatbook allows messy diapers, but if you actually look at their terms, they technically don't. They're basically just turning a blind eye to ABDL, but technically according to their TOS they don't allow ageplay content. If it ever becomes an issue for them they'll ban it as well.The reason all the models are on JFF right now is because there's literally no other choice. And they hate the platform. I've never seen the creator side of these things, but I know of at least one model who quit ABDL just because she didn't want to deal with JFF.And as far as promoting this stuff on social media goes? Instagram has cracked down on kicking out ABDL models. There's barely any ABDL people on there now. Just try searching for ABDL stuff on TikTok. The only options for ABDL content on social media are twitter and reddit. And even that may be getting scarcer in the future. There's talks in the US government of stricter controls on adult content on social media.>You (or someone) mentioned your magazine , CoucheI'm not the Couche guy. But I think it reinforces my point that it used to be easier to use traditional distribution channels to sell this sort of stuff.I think one of the things I get hung up on is just that the only option nowadays is JFF models trying to do this stuff on their own and that produces low quality content, even if there's a lot of it.Traditional porn companies avoid this kink, not because there's no demand, but because the stigma for it seems to be so much stronger. More and more websites refuse to let people host this content. More models will refuse to do it. So old-school porn producers won't dabble in it like they used to.
>>2591975>>2591977>>2592043>As for sex-negative, compared to when?I swear I'm not trying to be a dick and I'm probably not getting my point across exactly. People's sexual identity is something they can be much more open about now, but I mean specifically sexual imagery. Talking about sex as a fun, naughty thing. The attitude around it and the culture around it has changed, and I think that's legit. Or even more specifically maybe just imagery meant to appeal to hetero males.Sexual imagery in advertising used to be commonplace and accepted. Sexy women in media and putting them in titillating situations just meant to appeal to horny men. It was possible to depict women being sexy and stupid and cute and even if people complained about it being offensive, it was still understood that that was what appealed to men and it was just meant as cheeky fun.Society has absolutely become much more sex-negative. Maybe not in terms of the acceptance of an individual's sexuality. But the way we talk about it has absolutely changed. Sex isn't allowed to just be fun anymore.As for the Youtube videos. The only reasons those two channels are allowed to post what they do on Youtube is because the content they post is incredibly chaste. Not a whiff of sexuality in there. They'd get banned. Those Youtube channels basically just exist as advertisements to direct people to their JFF. Both channels have even basically said that they have to be incredibly careful about actually showing the women in diapers, and other channels that have attempted to do 'diaper reviews' and stuff like that had to stop because they couldn't include shots of themselves actually wearing the diapers.I'm not trying to be a shit-stirrer but I can't believe anyone on here thinks that this kink is in a good place or has a good future. If for no other reason than the fucking government.>>2591883Kek.
anybody have any idea who this model is? I think she's super hot.
>>2591908>>2591912It is. I have the same pictures saved somewhere. I think I saw her pictures reposted on the abdl_japan X account, and possibly the japanese-abdl tumblr last year or the year before. I scrolled back to march 2025 on the X account and still didn't see her, but she could be buried further back than that assuming her account is still active or around. Hope this helps unless someone comes along with better information.
>>2592050I don't know these people. I repost the same pictures from my folder that is only sourced from 4chan.
yallwhich diaper is this? ignore her stupid face i just want to know the name of the diaper
>>2592141Her face actually looks good for her there.
>>2592141Looks like a japanese one, going from the pink box above "front"
i found itOmutopia Pastel Puffies
>>2592141She has a weird face, I agree. Sometimes in pics she looks like a Splicer from Bioshock. That being said, her content is consistently good. Also seems to be one of the few mainstream models that actually enjoys messing.
>>2591444Pookie? A blonde lass with I think it was Treacher Collins or some shit.
>>2592196I didn't realize she did messing. Anyone have a pic?
>>2592347Yeah her. I don’t want it to seem like I’m saying anything against the girl. Not something I really have an issue with but it’s clear why she hid herself.
>>2590615>>2590615Here's the update,They hold huge amount and puff out so much it's difficult to take the trousers after a full very hydrated day.Definitely a great choice.They're my personal portable toilet when I'm diapered 24/7Huge back padding so even messing them isn't a problem when sitting in my home office.Amazing product.
>>2592052Thanks. I went through the entire history on abdl_japan and japanese-abdl, and couldn't find her on either. I considered possibly she had a different pictures posted by abdl_japan, so I started going through most of the accounts but I've been rate limited. I did find some other girls I was looking for, so it's not all in vain. Do you have any other photos of her, or just those two?On a side note, it looks like a lot of the abdl girls and lolita fashion have largely moved to Hong Kong from Japan. A lot of the clothes my wife gets are from HK, so I suppose this checks out.
>>2592503Sorry to hear it, I thought for sure it would be one of those two places, but glad you made some other finds. Maybe she deleted all her stuff? I checked my folders and I have the same two you saved and nothing else unfortunately.
Welp, that was an interesting evening on /b/...
>>2592654Just tell the story if you want to tell the story. Don't vaguepost in fucking /abdl/ of all places
>>2592655You haven't seen all the diaper threads happening at once? There's 3 threads active right now. The normies are getting pissed off over it.
>>2592656It's intentional
>>2592656>>2592661The bot has finally been banned, he hasn’t posted in 4 hours despite the surviving thread not being at image limit
>>2592639god i fucking love her
>>2592878These have to be the worst type of tits
>>2592881Not even close
>>2592885Considering that’s a poorly edited photo. Rather a big plump hanger than a sad sack of nothing
>>2592881Not even a handful. Might as well be flat chested at that point. It would be a lot more aesthetic
>>2592885You're wrong, those are the grossest tits on earth, very disgusting!
>>2592878Is this a tranny on hormones
>>2592896
>>2592908They look nice. Smaller but these pictures are years apart, I’m fed up seeing that edited one
>>2592911Think this is the original
>>2592913No gay or trans content on /hc/
>>2593023i aint gay or trans, just don’t got my tits out, mb
>>2592913If real girl post more
>>2593029better?
>>2593034Yup.
Don't care about 4chan politics etc. Scotty my favourite.
>>2592913>>2593034cute!
>>2592913>>2593034Are you taking the photos upside down on purpose for laughs or what's going on here? oc is always appreciated, but what the hell dude.
>>2593034someone needs a change
>>2593034Why are you posting from Australia?
>>2593034I flipped your image and you have mand hands. Post vagina or gtfo
>>2593101this is a diaper thread? and idk why it’s posting upsidown *sob* chuckling at the australia comment tho. is this flat enough that it doesn’t look like im a tranny? do you need me to fucking ride ur cock before you believe me? i don’t rlly have pics of my coochie saved bc i am more diapersexual.
>>2593120>this is a diaper thread?Post your vagina in a diaper then. Take a shot while changing. Again, gay content is not allowed on this board.Also your filenames changed.
>>2593129They posted partial tits. Theres constantly pictures in these threads that could be trannies. Lots of faceless shots without a hint of boob even. I don’t like them either but chill out
>>2592906Nope, that's Allie-n-Daddy. She's pretty open there about this. Actually, I like her down to earth opinions on this kink. She's pretty even keeled.
>>2593120Man fuck that guy I'll daddy you, no parts verification required.
>>2593135Lost weight. That explains it. Weird looking pic though
>>2593120>diapersexualbased
>>2593137 WOOOOO!!!>>2593147 hell yeahh B]kiss my ass :3
>>2593151FUCK RELEASE ME FROM AUSTRALIA
>>2593038Same I still have her Wishlist from years ago. I would get her something only it might not have the right address.
>>2593151those kinda look like garbage bagsfitting i guess
>>2593151Super cute. God I really would love to daddy you. Also why TF is dude so mad about you specifically? These threads used to be full of cute girls sharing oc until losers like him made them leave.
>>2593170I would actively tell any girl to avoid posting here. Thats how bad I consider a lot of these guys
>>2593158Fuck off incel.
>>2593151>kiss my assok
>>2593173chill out tranny, it wasn't an insultdiapers are garbage bags that hold human waste
>>2593183Also trannies are trash
>>2593171It really sucks cause this lifestyle/fetish is full of them on any site and really makes it hard to connect with similarly interested girls because they are wary AF from experience.
>>2593183Lmao if I was a tranny I'd still be twice the man as you since you lack the conviction to stand by your thinly veiled insult.
>>2593201Without being a simp about it I have often been shocked at the sheer vitriol Scotty gets simply for posting herself and chatting in threads. We wont get that sort of thing again and maybe that’s a good thing
>>2593210you're an autistic trannydon't bother replying
>>2593218it's like one dude that spergs out hard over her
>>2593120By the way it's posting upside down because your images are taken upside down and your phone is applying rotation metadata to them. 4chan strips metadata from uploaded images for security, so upside down/sideways images happen.
>>2593275THANK YOU! also finally home and gonna shower, is this better? haha diapers or something lol. i don’t have any rn bc broke as fuck, so you’re going to have to make eye contact with my massive dong.
>>2593276diaper missing
>>2593390More like this
>>2593376>>2593379Love the girl in diapers + masculine hobby combo, vanilla stuff does it well and wish more abdl stuff did it.
>>2593394Reminds me of some of Belle Delphine's shoots.Her famous bathwater shoot was in a LittleForBig onesie too. None 0 chance of her being into diapers but knowing it's way too divisive to let her audience know
>>2593402
>>2591523>>2591547yeah, and i'd say that's the whole reason ABDL is an umbrella despite the fact that there's actually a really distinct divide. these days, ABDL is really just AB. it's quite rare to find someone, especially if they're making content, who is just into the diapers and not the regression. a lot of those old sites would occupy different spots on the spectrum.classic diapergal couldn't be beat. that period with faye, natalia, sasha, etc. was absolute top tier content. wide range of models, styles, scenarios, and video types. if you want to see how far the content has fallen, just check out faye's effort to go solo. samey, bland videos which feel like a random keyword mashup. aunt-elli was also quite good with tiffany, jenn, and so on, and had a much more amateur feel. and the amateurs who were around at this time, such as pandpants, were also far more genuine that it was a fetish or a kink.these days, it's just money. if you compare pandapants content these days to her stuff years ago, it felt much less like she was Being An ABDL Model, which is the problem all the contemporary stuff has, and was therefore much more enticing. you can also look at resonantyes whose first partner, who was an incontinent DL, put out much better photos and ABDL content than his new partner, who is an onlyfans thot.all the content is so similar. like a ten second clip of a girl shaking her butt in a diaper. pay $20 a month for the privilege. sugarylittle is maybe the most recent personality to do longform content... which she tends to let down by an overuse of baby diapers for some bizarre reason.it's all locked behind a paywall and there are virtually no places to have discussions about or around ABDL subjects these days. back then, you had places like ABDLStoryForum, FoxTalesTimes, etc. sure, they were weird, but they catered to different niches. nowadays, you can go to like r/abdl but that's only if you want to be around the It's A Lifestyle crowd. no thanks!
>>2593484dude with a face app/ai. much more obvious in the older photos. lots of the japanese abdl people on twitter are males using ai to look like women.
>>2593034You’re very attractive, I do have to ask though what makes you wanna post here? would give lots of pats and all that so glad you are. >>2593201It’s like very mixed, I’ve honestly met a lot of chill people on 4chan, not in this thread, but in like the /D/ and /trash/ threads. I doubt I’ll ever find any girl here or ever kek but not everyone sucks. Somehow still better than Reddit or ‘cord although that’s not saying much>>2593120Being diapersexual is based, it’s nice to see original content here of all places. >>2593447>>2593376It’s definitely a huge thing for me as well, but it’s also just partly because it gives me false. Hope that I could find someone cute who I can share both with. I could re-create this myself I have a mk4 but i’m male so wouldn’t be hot or cute
>>2592050I tried using multiple reverse image searches, and I actually couldn’t find that. This is like an aesthetic. I find really hot and I’m also curious if anyone else can.
>>2593276>i don’t have any rn bc broke as fuckngmi
what are ya'alls thoughts on girls who are into the little side and into actual little gear and wanted to be babied?
>>2593561In my experience that is most of them. It’s just a natural extension of being female. Women want to be looked after, not necessarily to the extent of wearing diapers, but a lot of it is fairly normal relationship stuff anyway. Women are far more likely to be into it for those reasons than sexual so you generally need to accept that.
>>2593570bruh, using pacifiers, playing with baby toys, eating baby food, wanting a crib is not a normal extension of being female. The vast majority of girls who are into the AB side use it to cope with childhood trauma.
>>2593575I know one girl who started wearing due to incontinence. Fuck you bitch.
>>2593575I quite obviously didn’t mean the extremes I meant coddling and being cared for, vulnerable with a dominant male. I shouldn’t need to point that out. Ive had a few vanilla girlfriends who were into dressing cute, girly toys and plushies. It is often not that difficult to take that further
>>2593580you calling me a bitch? wearing a diaper due to incontinence has nothing to do with the subject at hand. try and keep up
>>2593078i am also wearing this diaper right now
>>2593613Nah. Just ranting at the incontinent diaper bitch that ruined my life.
>>2593615How so? Was she into ABDL or just incontinent. #1 or #2?
>>2593575I've seen very competent professional women practically turn into toddlers around their boyfriends and husbands. Pouting, whining, demanding stuffed toys, wanting to be carried etc.It's less of a leap than you'd think
>>2593619It is surprising how many adults are children pretending to be adults.
>>259361650% abdl, 50% incontinent. 100% cunt.
>>2593622Yeah but women especially
>>2593624No lol
>>2593625Yah lol. You ask 1000 men and 1000 women if they'd rather have their partner make all the decisions in their relationship in exchange for not having to work, I fucking guarantee you women take the deal at a rate several times higher than men
>>2593626What does that have to do with arrested development?
>>2593633Who the fuck mentioned arrested development?
>>2593623what happened? she was already into this but actually needed to wear? she cheat on you?
>>2593575playing with baby toys maybe not but plenty of normal women are extremely into soft toys, dolls, watching kids shows, nobody is eating baby food it’s absolutely disgusting. But again lots of women enjoy platters of small snacky foods presented in a cute way. wanting a crib is not a practical thing for the majority of people despite the most dedicated lifestyle people and professional adult nurseries. But in the same vein plenty of women will want a bed with fluffy cushions, blankets soft toys. If you had any amount of experience with women you will find the leap isnt as big as you would think with a lot of normie women. It just doesn’t often stretch to your examples which are in the extreme end.Also this >>2593619Women are babies and usually want to plead their man anyway, I’ve never really found it difficult to get mine to be diapered.
>>2593662>I’ve never really found it difficult to get mine to be diapered.Please dump your sage advice
>>2593664I ask them
>>2593665And they just acquiesce and wear? Is there any preparation or getting them used to other things. Its such a niche fetish and its associated with babies and poop.
>>2593482sauce?
>>2593662yeah so you're wrong. my ex ate snacks meant for babies. she saw herself as an actual little even though she was over 18. She absolutely wanted a crib and i easily could have made that happen. She wanted the full 24/7 lifestyle. You're talking about fucking blankets over here. Do some research before you talk shit.
>>2593670Yeah nut jobs like that aren’t the norm I’m talking about the average woman. Not psychos
>>2593658I'd love to get it off my chest but we met through 4chan. She'll see and probably start kicking off.
>>2593702You’ve already been moaning like fuck why not keep going
>>2593575With great DDLG comes great BPD.
>>2593704They went back to pink goodnites recently. It's weird cos they also recently made potty training pullups gender neutral
>>2593775I wonder how big the adult diaper (abdl) market is actually worth.
>>2593778Literally hundreds of dollars
>>2593778Enough that there are literally dozens of different companies all printing their own designs. That's pretty significant. I would guess maybe in the low to mid hundreds of millions. $200-500M maybe.
>>2593781Thats unironically enough to lobby local politicians kek. I work for a franchise bank (only operating two states rn) thats worth like 50 million and we have a guy advocating for us in the local senate.When do we get ABU to lobby congress for tax write offs and diaper gfs?
>>2593782>Thats unironically enough to lobby local politicians kek.I mean it's not. The Tolkien Estate that owns the rights to Lord of the Rings and all the merch and games and all the other IP rights is worth $500M. They're not buying any politicians.
>>2593781They're printing their own designs but they all order from 1 of 2/3 Chinese manufacturers. Only good quality diaper companies I can immediately think of with their own in-house manufacturing are BetterDry and NorthShore. The lack of it really reduces their total assets. Lots of shipping costs + tariff risk, and no contract with the supplier = no diapers.Just from rough measurements, excluding pallets, a 40' container can fit 816 cases of medium Crinklz, and at $135 per case (LL Medico retail price), that's $110,000 USD of stuff. And those are cheap diapers, so ABUs premium diapers probably double that number. A warehouse could have half a million dollars of diapers in it.So the whole industry is maybe, upper end estimate, $100M? Customer base, brand name, product lines, accumulated stock, contracts with manufacturers? Probably closer to your estimates if we include those shitty drug store diapers due to higher sales volumes, customer reach, and brand name recognition.
>>2593816I am hoping that one day ABDL diapers (probably not) and higher end med diapers (likely) manage to break it into mainstream enough that they're sold at pharmacies and walmart etc. They brands they have in stock right now are......... bad. Like I dont even know how legit incontinent people handle them, not even the diapers at hospitals are that bad.
>>2593625This gal's husband makes too much money for her to be showing herself like this on socials.
>>2593702Doubt it. Tell us mate. Besides, we're on your side, not some cunt who cannot control her bowels.
>>2593666Yeah. I've been with 5 women seriously in my life. All 5 have participated. It's called not being an autist and actually being normal about it. Most people will engage in fetishes to please their partner. God knows I have as well. It's a matter of how you broach it and how you are about it. If you wanna be diapered 24/7 and not work, probably not happening. If you wanna get drunk on a weekend and swap pissed diapers before fucking and cuddling... easy.
>>2593819There’s two sides to everything. I wouldn’t take a side of someone this obviously seething. I know my ex probably tells people I’m a psycho. Not sure why he’s pretending he’s not dying to unload though. Can’t be bothered checking but thinking remember it being alluded to in the last thread. Like tell us or fuck off
>>2593821How many sides do triangles have?
>>2593821I don't even care if it's the truth, I just wanna hear his side of the story. Being with a chick who wore a diaper isn't a huge deal, just tell the board or fuck off. I hate teases it makes me think they're just cucks. Like, here's my story.... or don't even mention it. Making one up is better than teasing. We're all just a bunch of randos anyways.
>>2593818explain pls
>>2593820I feel like this is new (introducing GF to diapers), when I first started getting into this kink like 10 years ago, people constantly posted about how they were never gonna find diaper GFs. But now so many of my bros are getting their GFs into diapers.I guess maybe this kink has absorbed enough not always online autists that we now have a sizeable population that can actually function in reality.O maybe kink is more acceptable now.
>>2593825The ones posting and complaining were the ones who couldn’t get women in general
>>2593817>I dont even know how legit incontinent people handle themBecause most people with continence issues aren't incontinent, so stores don't serve them. Most just have light leakage, so a proper taped diaper with multiple hours capacity is wasted because they can make it 97% of the time. Combine that with the stigma that still surrounds diapers and the push for them to be "invisible under all clothes" and you get the modern pharmacy diaper aisle. Most people grabbing them there just don't need a Megamax, they need a pullup to catch a few drops after they laugh.Fully incontinent people are SOL unless they buy online. I don't think anything in any of my local (big city) pharmacies would really work. Just not enough demand to warrant keeping proper diapers in stock. Hopefully NorthShore or some other proper medical diapers can get into pharmacies at some point.
IDK why but reddit is like THE place for candid diapergirl pics now. It kinda pisses me off.
>>2593528eh idk just like engaging with the community, and its nice to find new ppl! i post a bit elesewhere but the added anonymity is nice and make me a lil more comfy to show off a bit! also yesterday i got to have a diapered hangout with my boyfriend and another friend. i take pride in having gotten my boyfriend into diapers. B]
Over my life so far, there have been 5 girls who I've diapered. I met all on Fetlife, so I knew before we started that we had somewhat compatible kinks - but not all explicitly listed diapers.It's of course a bit of a crapshoot how well you get along on vanilla issues - and of course, as a guy, you are competing among many for a relatively small pool of women. It's almost cliche advice, but you get a reasonably high response rate to approaches (even without pictures of yourself on the profile), if you can write a thoughtful and engaging message - which requires actually reading their profiles, and not just sending "hey babe u looking for a daddy?"That being said, the resulting relationships were varied. Among the five, 2 had BPD, 1 was autistic (not a problem, but also said she only wanted a short fling), 1 was nice but boring (though a real DL, so the kink was very compatible), and 1 (my current girlfriend) has serious childhood trauma, but not to the extent of causing her to treat people in her life like shit.I think that ABDL has become a little bit more normalized over the last decade. Diapers as a fetish will always be somewhat niche- but the idea of adult women acting like children, especially in dom/sub relationships, is now far more widespread, and much less taboo, at least within BDSM and kink scenes.
>>2593837cute!
>>2593837More detailed shot of the blankie please. Looks cute!
>>2593831You said it yourself, if you're really that incontinent then you're ordering online.
>>2593836Because everytime a chick posts here you have people accusing them of being a dude. See above. Whereas on Reddit those comments get downvoted. Blame the incel losers who are so insecure that every woman that isn't a 10/10 and showing their vag and birth certificate because they might accidentally jerk off to a dude once.
>>2593955It usually is a guy. They only need to prove otherwise it’s not a big ask. It’s because Reddit doesn’t have the reputation of 4chan. If people have even heard of this site these days it’s for negative reasons. I mean fucking hell go to /b/ right now it’s probably loli, blacked and log threads. Why would anyone stay really
>>2593931Being incontinent like 30+ years ago must have been the worst.
>>2593958Yeah this place is well known for doxing girls. It happened to the only one we’ve really had.
>>2593959I imagine pre-diapers was pretty bad. Would be horrible being incontinent in like the middle ages or even Victorian era. Imagine some incontinent princess trying to get out of those dresses and corsets all the time.
>>2593964I researched historical underwear and diapers for a bit because I was interested in maybe writing a Regency England diaper fiction.Basically women wearing underwear at all didn’t really happen until the Victorian era. Before then women actually wore what were essentially crotchless bloomers.Babies wore cloth diapers that were tied in place rather than being pinned, and then a fabric diaper cover over that. But it seems relatively common to have just been attentive to when a baby was about to go and putting them over a chamber pot, which is essentially what the adults were doing anyway
>>2593964>>2593965Oh sorry I should say when I’m talking about diapers there I mean Regency Era. So they had cloth diapers for hundreds of years, I don’t know about before that era
>>2593959Given how bad diapers were 20 years ago compared to today, anything further back must've been horrible. Constant leaks, no capacity, extremely loud crinkling, lots of laundry, plastic covers on everything...Really glad that diapers have come a long way since then. Not just for us, but for the incontinent as well.
>>2593998If I had a nickel for every dragon/gaming-themed diaper that exists, I would have two nickels. Which isn't a lot, but it's weird that it's happened twice.
Im surprised no one's posted my ex yet
>>2594001post her
