Post some interesting infographics here
>>16523986what is that, explain it, what is ENS, what is REALE. Why even write that instead of just the thing inside ()
>>16525692> Moses> "King" David> "Kingdom" is IsraelI thought alt-history wasn't allowed here?
>>16526778all history is altHErstory is now mainstream
>>16526778don't be a bigot anon
>>16523986got your back fagbut next time post 3
>>16527378nah
>>16523986Italy's genetics.
>>16523986Japan's genetics.
>>16527389
>>16523986Spain's genetics.
>>16527399>>16523986Spain, part 2.
>>16527405Let me add that if you exclude the Canary Isles, which are propped up by tourism, the Iron Age + German admixture correlates even more with the average salary in each region (R2=0,7716).
>>16523986Here's Wikipedia censoring Scythian history in Japan.
>>16523986Here's some info about the concept of race.
>>16523986Here's some info about the 1965 immigration reform.
>>16527430Original.
>>165274461. This just shows asians and natives are the same?2. There is no claim here.3. The fact that genes differ between populations, and those genes correlate with traits, doesn't prove genes cause those traits. Trannies use the same argument as racists. It's a spurious correlation and means nothing. In your graph most of the brain genes have moderate correlation and the things with strong correlation are random bullshit that nobody cares about.4. This is a pointless repeat of 1.5. Density. Americans are dumber than Africans for example. Americans are obese retards.6. This is just repeating 1 for a second time.7. Cherrypicking ten base pair polymorphisms out of the millions that exist is just faggotry. 8. This is just plain wrong, mutts are inferior to both groups and your study has to exclude them. It's one thing to argue for race, it's another to argue for the admixture being linear. In reality mutts are inferior to both groups not intermediate.
>>16523986Here's something more humorous, but also scary. A cautionary tale for us.
>>16523986Here's how the Britts actually belong to the Med club.
>>16527389>tuscany is the most important part of Italy>closer to southerners than northernersSo I guess Southern genetics > Northern genetics
>>16527602>tuscany is the most important part of Italy>closer to southerners than northerners>So I guess Southern genetics > Northern geneticsVery low bait.
>>16523986Here's French ethnic groups, showcasting how they are a mix of pretty much every west European peoples.
>>16527713I'm talking throughout history, not just post 1871.
>>16527733Excuse me, 1883 is when the north overtook the south's economy.
>>16527736Tuscany has 64,5% European haplogroups, where the highest is in Friuli-Venezia Giulia with 77%, so by blood they're more northern than center, nevermind southern.
>>16527773Allosomes represent a very small part of the genome. Autosomal similarity, really whole genome similarity, is more important. Focusing on haplogroups is ridiculous.
>>16527598This infographic is just wrong though. The 2022 study on the English genome proved that the Anglo-Saxons had a major impact.
>>16527786Haplogroups correlate very heavily with the autosomal admixture.
>>16527836>>16527786And even more interestingly, European haplogroups correlate even more stronly with the average height. Which obviously makes sense - if you can track your direct ancestry through a European line, you're way more likely to have a European admixture.
>>16527838>>16527836>>16527786And this is the data I used for the admixture data:>>16527405
>discussing Italy -> whips out Spain>uses a nebulous term 'European haplogroup' without definition >ignores whole genome analysis in favor of convenient selection of comparisons Not even gonna (You) you.
>>16527853>discussing Italy -> whips out SpainThe same correlations appear in those 2 countries, i didn't want to spam the thread. And secondly - if it's in both countries, it strenghtens my argument. >uses a nebulous term 'European haplogroup' without definition It says right there which haplogroups I'm counting. In the 1st pic it's sideways, so it might be hard for you to read, I understand. >ignores whole genome analysis in favor of convenient selection of comparisons A country-wide analysis of haplogroups is not a genome analysis? Of course it is. The source for the Iron+German admixture is from >>16527405
>>16523986A quick reminder that Einstein is a fraud and thief.
>>16523986Here's an interesting one. It seems to imply that at their height, the Roman Empire was purer genetically, closer to modern northern Spaniards. But years later, after allowing more and more people rights within the Empire, the genepool got diluted with foreign blood.
>>16523986Examples of anti-birth propaganda.
>>16523986That's a more controversional one. But true.
>>16523986Here's a correlation between women's years spent in school and number of children they have.
>>16523986That's an important one. Shows how single mothers ruin society, no exaggeration.
>>16528296Lorentz, Poincare and Michelson are fully credited for what they did - hence, Lorentz transformations, Michelson-Morley experiment. But Einstein was the one to combine Michelson's experimental data and the math of Lorentz and Poincare with the idea of the constancy of the speed of light, from which he then derived his theory special relativity. Also Einstein was lauded the Nobel prize for the explanation of the photoelectric effect, not for special or general relativity. So you're wrong on several accounts.
>>16523986Ancestry of American whites.
>>16523986World blue eyes map. Althou I'm not sure if it doesn't count up.
>>16527395An eye opener in both senses
>>16529028This clears up the question how the Japanese can be so creative, far above other asians.
>>16523986Here's the power of the almighty British Empire.
>>16523986Here's a good one. Shows the genetic background of South America. Basically how European men had children with native women, which is the population foundation of that continent.
>>16523986Galen Winsor and the nuclear hoax.
>>16523986The HDI (Human Development Index) in Europe by region.
>>16528919>British (Incl. Irish)An Irish person would have a stroke reading this.
>>16523986Economic and political reasons for why Souther Italy is as way poorer than the North.
>>16523986Here's an interesting one. About the hypnagogic state bringing out the creativity within us, and the "brain being only a receiver of the knowledge in the universe".
>>16530770Why fight to be free from the British, when they're importing the third world now? They're no different than the British now, just a little different of an accent. Only 40% of the Irish can speak any amount of their traditional language. They're English in all but name, at this point.
>>16523986European people's phenotypes.
>>16523986Comparrison between inter-human and inter-animal genetic differences.
>>165239864 main racial types and haplogorups.
>>16532044the phenotype in north africa is way way different, anyone can see a more here
>>16532049biologists discover new species because they're numbersfags
>>16523986>>16527399>>16527405Spain - genetic makeup (PCA) and genetic history - timeline.
>>16533341They probably went with the K13 model, where the mediterranean admixture is the highest in NA - around 50%. Red Sea+North-west Africa+Sub S. Africa is 39%.
>>16533456There's also an interesting chart in that study that shows R1b haplogroup basically replacing everyone else around 2400 BC.
>>16523986Correlation between the geographic distribution of the North Atlantid people and the blue banana - the area that's responsible for the vast majority of Europes advances in economy and science.
>>16528930That's a Latvian flag used for Estonia.Just goes to show what backwoods of europe baltics really is and why foreigners haven't found it
