Not a good moment for British Canada.
Imagine >three fucking leaves
>>16536412The fact that the Fleur-de-lis was even considered makes me hate the Quebecoise even more which I thought was impossible
>>16536457Without Quebecers you'd be Australia with snow.
>>16536470But Canada is already Australia with snow
>>16536479More so than already. At least this way there's an actual subversive prosocial movement instead of colonial serfs pretending to be freemen.
>>16536502>colonial serfsWe had self-government since the 1790s.
>>16536502the Quebecois were literal colonial serfs who were given freedom by the British though
>>16536412This is simply an accurate representation of Canada. It's no longer an Anglo-French country, Canada today is more and more Indian and Chinese and thus it would be illogical for the flag to represent British and French culture.
>>16536412I think the middle one actually looks the nicest
>>16536457Canada=QuébecSeethe, cope and dilate, cultureless angl*ïd scum
>>16536412Why not the second with one single red leaf? It's better
>>16536412Why the fucking leaf? Just keep the shield that represents all of Canada’s founding ethnicities. They could easily have had the red and white stripes with the shield in the middle and it’d be many times better.
>>16537164Because that's le racist european and Canada is a post national state, an economic zone in wich Indians can freely outnumber locals.
>>16536470You say that like it's a bad thing.
>>16537174Canada really was the first one to adopt a completely boring, corporate flag. A lumber conglomerate could use it and it wouldn’t be out of place.
>>16537123So something like this would work better?
>>16537164umm... according to science that's not friggin' Vexillological. The experts say all flags must be bland, simplistic corporate logos.
