I'll start
>>16552914Chudhairy Ratmat Ali may he be struck down by Krishna and curse place upon his bloodline
Tought it was an Pakistani co prosperity empire until i noticed the outline of India
>According to his writings, "Indianism" meant emphasizing the abode and culture of the "caste Hindus" as the primary and essential constituent of a subcontinent-wide nation. It was in his view Indianism was "the designation of a State created by the British for the first time in history", citing that the All-India National Congress being established in 1885 as evidence that Indianism originated in the hands of the British in the service of British imperialism. He criticizes the notion of the unity of "the country of India"; instead he considers it a continent with a wide variety of nations, ethnicities and religions, and that the Muslims, Sikhs, the Marathas, the Akhoots (untouchables) and the Rajputs were in fact separate nations, on whom the fetters of "Indianism" were fastened by imposing on all of them this "preposterous prefix of All-India".[27Was he right?
>>16552965It's obviously right. India is like if you took Europe and divided it into 3 countries based on religion two-three other small meme states. But that's a good thing, they made a Hindu superpower for the first time in history.
>>16552965Yes, and that's why literally every other successful Asian society has abolished their caste systems at least officially. Codifying it leads to the divine right of bolshevik middlemen to rule, which is beyond stupid. Imagine if every time you wanted to make a change to society you had to consult Clintonites who say they have millennia of knowledge so you aren't shit. The BJP today exists as a response to the mismanagement of that minority, but they'd never figure it out because they're too busy eating cow dung and murdering people for eating meat.
>>16552914Based