Western European countries have tons of wealth, they pour into archaelogical projects and monument preservation, and historicals documents and texts are preserved and studied extensively Third world countries don't have this luxury, however. They're poorer, so their archaeology is hamstrung by political instability, monuments are at risk of being destroyed by iconoclasts, and texts have long decayed or were destroyedIs this view correct?
>>16803765>monuments are at risk of being destroyed by iconoclastsmeanwhile niggers destroy them in the west
you are third world
>>16803765No it doesn't. If you are talking about archeological records, then a lot of places have very old archeological artifacts. There's just seems to be more in Europe cause the archeological is very developed in Europe. In terms of written records and civilization, then China takes the cake on that. Their civilization literally goes back to the Bronze Age. Meanwhile the oldest known civilization in Europe is the Mycenaeans, and the oldest concept of Western Civilization we all know goes back to the Middle Ages. Still quite old, but not THE OLDEST.
>>16803765>>16803846History is what was written down, not what happened. Europe undeniably has more written records than the entirety of the world many times over. Jeets for example never wrote anything down and as such dont have history as most of Asia, all non meso (most did not write anything too) American indians and all of SSA Africa does not
>>16803775Good, Whites are the enemy of humanity.
>>16803765I think China and India have way more, Egypt too
Neanderthal archeaology alone says yes. Two islands of finds in central asia and separating them from the vast majority of finds in Europe a a giant limbo of ex soviet states even most map distributions one finds on google
>>16804043https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veritable_Records_of_the_Joseon_Dynasty
>>16803846>Their civilization literally goes back to the Bronze AgeCommunist meme. Daily reminder that China, (or People's Republic of China, PRC) was created in 1947.
>>16803765This doesn't make sense. There's no way Germany has 400 the area of wales. Did it mean 6000 castles? That also seems too much for Wales
