[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


Historically speaking, have any nations literally run out of funds? No, I don't mean going broke, having no food/oil, or going into debt, but rather countries literally not having any money, not even money they can borrow from other countries/banks. If so, what the fuk happened to people in those countries?
>>
>>16806683
soviet union comes to mind
>>
>>16806683
Soviet union.
>If so, what the fuk happened to people in those countries?
They're forced to change economic approach, usually causing a series of disasters wrecking the entire country.
>>
>>16806683
I'm pretty sure this is what happened in France before the revolution. French government completely runs out of money, calls the estates general to talk about new taxes, and before you know it the entire government collapses.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.