[a / b / c / d / e / f / g / gif / h / hr / k / m / o / p / r / s / t / u / v / vg / vm / vmg / vr / vrpg / vst / w / wg] [i / ic] [r9k / s4s / vip / qa] [cm / hm / lgbt / y] [3 / aco / adv / an / bant / biz / cgl / ck / co / diy / fa / fit / gd / hc / his / int / jp / lit / mlp / mu / n / news / out / po / pol / pw / qst / sci / soc / sp / tg / toy / trv / tv / vp / vt / wsg / wsr / x / xs] [Settings] [Search] [Mobile] [Home]
Board
Settings Mobile Home
/his/ - History & Humanities


Thread archived.
You cannot reply anymore.


[Advertise on 4chan]


File: hqdefault.jpg (581 KB, 1600x1118)
581 KB
581 KB JPG
Historically, why does it seem so different from other """Southern""" states? It feels nothing like Texas or Louisiana or Mississippi or Georgia. It kind of just feels like Kentucky or West Virginia but with smaller hills.
>>
>>16808936
it was populated by settlers from the upper south
>>
>>16808936
Arkansas sucks, sucks, sucks. Everyone is very poor and like 80% of people have done meth.

>yeah is some nice nature, no?
>if you do go hiking stick to the trails because there's a lot of meth shacks out in the countryside and they'll just as soon kill you rather than risk some city slickers reporting them
>>
Southern Arkansas feels a lot like the rest of the south—flat fields and piney woods, while the Ozarks create more of an Appalachian vibe with music and culture.



[Advertise on 4chan]

Delete Post: [File Only] Style:
[Disable Mobile View / Use Desktop Site]

[Enable Mobile View / Use Mobile Site]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.